个人资料
正文

中国进入一个新时代

(2022-10-28 03:56:22) 下一个

中国的一个时代结束了

洪源远  

44年前,邓小平开启了“改革开放”时代,将中国从一个闭关自守的贫困国家变成了一个新兴的全球大国。
国家主席习近平已在上周正式结束了那个时代。他在北京召开的中国共产党全国代表大会上成为拥有绝对权威的人,制定了围绕自己所痴迷的控制和安全运作的国家计划,尽管这意味着损害经济。
中国的前景发生了巨大变化。
邓小平让中国取得惊人经济成就的战略有两个主要组成部分。第一个是中共内部的集体领导安排。邓小平拒绝了西方式的民主,但中国在毛泽东时期经历的几十年动荡让邓小平明白了一人统治的危险。他和中共把一定程度的制约与平衡引入了政治的最高层,包括领导人的任期限制。第二个组成部分是一心一意地抓经济增长,邓小平提出了“发展才是硬道理”的著名说法。中国各地的官员们一头扎进不惜一切代价促经济增长的工作中去,这给中国带来了繁荣,不过也带来了腐败、不平等和大规模工业污染等问题。
习近平上周在北京拆除了这些基础。他确保了自己继续担任至高无上领导人的第三个任期(如果不是终身的话),并将中共领导层全部换成了自己的亲信,同时将国家安全置于追求经济增长之上。
10月16日,在中共二十大开幕式上作报告时,习近平提到“安全”的次数显著高于“经济”,打破了以前的做法。他甚至明确地宣布:“国家安全是民族复兴的根基,社会稳定是国家强盛的前提。”
在共产党中国的政治中,措辞的微小变化可能预示着意识形态和政策的重大转变。如果说人们对习近平的意图还有任何疑虑的话,他发誓中国将坚持新冠清零政策“不动摇”则彻底打消了这些疑虑。习近平政府应对新冠大流行的做法名义上是公共卫生政策,实际上是中共设计出来的最强大的安全工具,对谁能进入中国、谁能去哪里进行限制,并通过公民和来访者必须在他们智能手机上安装的跟踪软件进行加强。
对长期以来习惯了邓小平的经济发展至上观的观察家们来说,习近平的政策选择似乎令人难以置信。控制新冠疫情的政策激怒了民众破坏了中国经济、削弱了国内消费、扰乱了制造业和物流,令外国和本土投资者望而却步
为什么这位几十年来最有权势的中国领导人如此痴迷于国家安全和国内控制,以至于要牺牲经济呢?答案是中国面临的一系列国内外挑战,其中一些因习近平本人的政策选择而变得更糟。
政治上,他可能担心“背后挨刀”,因为在长达十年的反腐败运动中,他树敌太多,包括潜在政治对手在内的数千名官员在这场运动中受到惩罚,而且,出于自我保护的本能,他正在加大打击力度。
经济上,他面临着积压已久的危机,中国经济正在急剧放缓房地产行业进入了崩溃状态,年轻人失业率创下新高。这些问题都因新冠清零和习近平的“共同富裕”运动进一步加剧,“共同富裕”政策旨在缩小不平等,解决大型科技企业和其他民营部门垄断问题,在去年突然引发了对这些企业的全面监管打击,让投资者感到震惊。股市反应强烈:中国许多最具创新力公司的市值在几个月里累计暴跌了逾1万亿美元
在外交政策方面,习近平展示出要挑战美国主导地位的野心。特朗普政府应对新冠疫情的杂乱无章,让习近平炫耀“东升西降”。但他的大奏凯歌有点为时过早。中国在经济、军事或科技实力上远不能与美国匹敌。虽然美国的民主正处于危机之中,但仍是一个真正强大的超级大国,也是一个有自我批评和自我更新能力的自由国家。习近平指责西方试图遏制中国,但他傲慢和咄咄逼人的做法助长了中国威胁论。
可以肯定的是,习近平并不打算完全放弃资本主义在中国取得的成功,正是这种成功使它的经济更有活力,带来了国际上的尊重和影响力。习近平也有值得赞扬的地方,他在着手解决前任们掩盖起来的严重问题,尤其是腐败和经济不平等。考虑到中国的人口和经济规模,习近平对一个在全球舞台上受尊重的强大中国的愿景是合理的。
但解决中国存在的大量问题需要采取谨慎的措施,而习近平似乎并不愿意这么做。解决中国经济放缓的问题,需要从放宽新冠疫情限制做起,也需要从海外进口更有效的疫苗,而他的政府一直不批准进口。虽然这些做法不是灵丹妙药,但它们是必要的第一步,将大大减轻中国人民的心理负担,也将让投资者放心,他的领导班子还没有完全失去理智。
习近平已让中国陷入了一种恶性循环:一个傲慢和专制的领导人不对社会负责,他的顾问们也对他听之任之,使他做出了糟糕的政策选择,增加了他面临的问题,加剧了他对出乱子的恐惧,导致他采取更多的压制做法。
他强调安全而不是经济活力的决定将产生全球性的后果。中国是世界第二大经济体,也是几十个国家的最大贸易伙伴。中国经济的长时间放缓将增加全球经济衰退的风险,使许多国家遭受痛苦。从长远来看,随着中国竞争力下降,全球供应链向其他新兴经济体转移的速度加快,可能会出现新赢家。但如果中国向内转,它将失去很多。为了弥补国内的限制性环境,中国的科技企业已在向海外扩张
邓小平及其继任者领导下的中国资本主义大革命已成为历史。习近平执政的前十年也已成为历史,在那段时间里,至少还有来自温和派的非亲信官员对他权力的最低限度制衡。毛泽东时代的中国以及苏联都已证明,专制独裁并不能使国家变得繁荣富强。专制独裁只会带来贫困和虚假的安全感。习近平可能会在未来几年里重新汲取这些教训。

洪源远(@yuenyuenang)是政治经济学家,著有《中国的镀金时代》(China’s Gilded Age)和《中国如何跳出贫困陷阱》。

翻译:纽约时报中文网

点击查看本文英文版。

An Era Just Ended in China

By Yuen Yuen Ang; Oct. 26, 2022
 
Ms. Ang is the author of “China’s Gilded Age.”
Forty-four years ago, Deng Xiaoping kicked off the period of “reform and opening up” that transformed China from a poor, autarkic nation into an emerging global power.

President Xi Jinping officially ended that era last week. He emerged from the Chinese Communist Party’s congress in Beijing with unchallenged authority and plans for China that revolve around his obsession with control and security — even if that means harming the economy.

It’s a momentous change in outlook.

Deng Xiaoping’s strategy for China’s spectacular economic achievements had two main components. The first was a collective leadership arrangement within the Communist Party. Deng rejected Western-style democracy, but China’s tumultuous decades under Mao Zedong had taught him that one-man rule is dangerous. He and the party introduced partial checks and balances into politics at the highest level, including term limits. The second component was a single-minded pursuit of economic growth that, Deng famously declared, would be China’s “hard principle.” Officials throughout China dove headlong into promoting growth at all costs — bringing prosperity but also corruption, inequality and heavy industrial pollution.

Last week in Beijing, Mr. Xi dismantled those foundations. He ensured that he would remain paramount leader of China for a third term — if not for life — and packed the party’s leadership with loyalists while heavily prioritizing national security over the pursuit of economic growth.

 

In his speech to the party congress at the Great Hall of the People on Oct. 16, he mentioned “security” significantly more often than “economy,” a major break with precedent. He went further, declaring unambiguously, “National security is the bedrock of national rejuvenation, and social stability is a prerequisite for building a strong and prosperous China.”

In Chinese politics, small changes in wording can herald big shifts in ideology and policy. If there were any remaining doubts about Mr. Xi’s intentions, he dispelled them by vowing that China would stick to its zero-Covid policy, “without wavering.” His government’s approach to the pandemic, a public health policy in name, is in reality the most powerful security tool devised by the Communist Party, restricting access to the country and controlling who can go where, underpinned by tracking apps that citizens and visitors must have on their smartphones.

For observers long accustomed to Deng’s growth-first ethos, Mr. Xi’s policy choice is mind-boggling. The Covid controls are angering citizenscrippling China’s economy, decimating domestic consumption, disrupting manufacturing and logistics, and repelling foreign and local investors alike.

Why is the most powerful Chinese leader in decades so obsessed with security and domestic control that he would sacrifice the economy? The answer lies in an array of domestic and foreign challenges, some worsened by Mr. Xi’s own policy choices.

Politically, he probably fears the proverbial knife in the back after making enemies through a decade-long anti-corruption campaign in which thousands of officials — possibly including potential political rivals — were punished and is doubling down on repression out of his instinct for self-preservation.

 

On the economic front, he faces smoldering crises, including an economy that is slowing sharply, a property sector meltdown and record-breaking youth unemployment. These problems have been exacerbated by the Covid controls and by Mr. Xi’s “common prosperity” campaign — a strategy for narrowing inequality and addressing monopolistic behavior by big tech firms and other private companies, which was punctuated by an abrupt and sweeping regulatory crackdown last year that has alarmed investors. The market backlash was intense: Within months, more than a trillion dollars in value at many of China’s most innovative companies evaporated.

On foreign policy, Mr. Xi has projected an ambition to challenge American primacy. The Trump administration’s chaotic handling of the pandemic prompted Mr. Xi to boast that “the East is rising and the West is declining.” But his triumphalism was premature. China is far from an even match with the United States in economic, military or technological power. And while American democracy is in crisis, the United States remains strong, a true superpower and a free country able to criticize and renew itself. Mr. Xi criticizes the West for seeking to contain China, but his hubris and aggressive approach helped bring about this threat.

To be sure, Mr. Xi does not intend to completely abandon the capitalist success that rejuvenated China and brought global respect and influence. And to his credit, he has confronted serious problems that his predecessors swept under the rug, particularly corruption and economic inequality. His vision of a powerful China, respected on the global stage, is warranted given his country’s size and economic clout.

But addressing China’s myriad problems will require measured steps that Mr. Xi seems disinclined to take. Putting out fires in China’s economy must begin with relaxing Covid restrictions and importing more effective vaccines, something that his government has prevented. These won’t be miracle cures, but they are necessary first steps that will go a long way toward alleviating stress on China’s people and reassuring investors that his leadership team has not lost all sense.

Mr. Xi has plunged China into a vicious cycle: A hubristic and authoritarian leader, unaccountable to society and unchallenged even by his own advisers, makes poor policy choices, which add to his problems, exacerbating his fears of a revolt and leading to more repression.

The consequences of his decision to emphasize security over economic vibrancy will be global. China is the world’s second-largest economy and the biggest trading partner of dozens of countries. A prolonged economic slowdown in China will increase the risk of a global recession, with many countries sharing the pain. In the long run, there may be winners as China’s waning competitiveness hastens a shift in global supply chains to other emerging economies. But if China turns inward, it will lose. Chinese tech companies are already expanding overseas to compensate for a restrictive home environment.

China’s great capitalist revolution under Deng and his successors is now history. So is Mr. Xi’s first 10 years in office, when there was at least a minimal layer of checks on his power from moderate, non-loyalist officials. China under Mao and the former Soviet Union proved that absolute dictatorships fail miserably at making nations prosperous and strong. They bring only impoverishment and false security. Mr. Xi is likely to relearn those lessons in the coming years.

 

Yuen Yuen Ang (@yuenyuenang) is a political economist and the author of “China’s Gilded Age” and “How China Escaped the Poverty Trap.”

[ 打印 ]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
评论
目前还没有任何评论
登录后才可评论.