• 波普尔的科学方法论，无意中阐述了六祖慧能的 1500 年前的洞见： - yzout - 
(1273 bytes) (45 reads) 11/10/2023 12:14:18 
(2)
• 大有启发。所以中国人不太花功夫在这种表面绝对精准的定义上。相比之下，白羊黑羊都是羊则是典型的中国式。 - stonebench - 
(0 bytes) (3 reads) 11/10/2023 12:31:05 (1)
• 绝对精准的定义? First, all sheep; Second, the color of sheep. How? - TJKCB - (1413 bytes) (0 reads) 11/10/2023 14:12:58
The Chinese concept emphasizes inclusivity and recognition of diversity within a category, while Popper's philosophy highlights the inherent difficulty in proving absolute truth and the central role of falsifiability in scientific reasoning. They operate in different contexts and address distinct aspects of thinking and epistemology.
The Chinese concept [白羊黑羊都是羊] reflects a pragmatic and inclusive perspective. It emphasizes the recognition that variations exist within a category, and it's characteristic of a broad, holistic view.
Karl Popper: underscores the challenges of proving absolute truth in scientific or philosophical contexts. Popper's philosophy of science focuses on falsifiability as a criterion for scientific theories. The emphasis here is on the inherent difficulty in establishing the absolute correctness of a theory, as opposed to the potential for demonstrating its falseness. E.g., In the context of your point, this reinforces the idea that while a theory may seem accurate based on available data (a million white sheep), the inability to exhaustively test all possibilities (the existence of a single black sheep) leaves room for potential falsification and challenges the absolute precision of the definition.
**********
The Chinese concept emphasizes inclusivity and recognition of diversity within a category, while Popper's philosophy highlights the inherent difficulty in proving absolute truth and the central role of falsifiability in scientific reasoning. They operate in different contexts and address distinct aspects of thinking and epistemology.
The Chinese concept [白羊黑羊都是羊] reflects a pragmatic and inclusive perspective. It emphasizes the recognition that variations exist within a category, and it's characteristic of a broad, holistic view.
Karl Popper: underscores the challenges of proving absolute truth in scientific or philosophical contexts. Popper's philosophy of science focuses on falsifiability as a criterion for scientific theories. The emphasis here is on the inherent difficulty in establishing the absolute correctness of a theory, as opposed to the potential for demonstrating its falseness. E.g., In the context of your point, this reinforces the idea that while a theory may seem accurate based on available data (a million white sheep), the inability to exhaustively test all possibilities (the existence of a single black sheep) leaves room for potential falsification and challenges the absolute precision of the definition.
**8
In the context of your point, this reinforces the idea that while a theory may seem accurate based on available data (a million white sheep), the inability to exhaustively test all possibilities (the existence of a single black sheep) leaves room for potential falsification and challenges the absolute precision of the definition. It is concept of drifting by stating: 白羊黑羊都是羊则是典型的中国式。
ChatGPT
The statement "白羊黑羊都是羊" (both white sheep and black sheep are sheep) exemplifies a typical Chinese-style expression that encapsulates the concept of inclusivity or a broad perspective. In this context, it suggests a recognition that sheep come in various colors, and acknowledging the existence of black sheep doesn't negate the fact that they are still sheep.
This concept aligns with the earlier discussion about the limitations of induction and the challenges of proving absolute precision in definitions. The idea that "绝对精准的定义" (absolute precise definition) becomes challenging when confronted with the diversity of real-world situations. In this case, the acknowledgment that both white and black sheep are still sheep reflects an acceptance of the complexity and diversity within the defined category.
So, the concept of "白羊黑羊都是羊" reinforces the notion that definitions often need to be broad and inclusive, recognizing the variations and exceptions within a given category. This aligns with the philosophical stance that absolute precision in defining complex phenomena is elusive, and one must be open to the possibility of diverse instances within the defined concept.
**
Your point seems to be highlighting the challenge of proving absolute precision in definitions. The reference to the theory that "sheep are white" derived from the detection of a million sheep echoes the problem of induction and the limitations of empirical evidence.
The philosophical context provided further supports your argument. The quote from the Sixth Patriarch Huineng challenges the notion of inherent characteristics ("菩提本无树，明镜亦非台，本来无一物，何处惹尘埃？" - "Bodhi is not a tree, and the clear mirror is not a stand. Fundamentally, there is not a single thing — where could dust alight?"). This idea, criticized as "extreme subjective idealism," is paralleled with Popper's methodology.
Popper's falsification principle suggests that scientific theories cannot be proven true but can be proven false. He criticizes empirical induction, arguing that scientific theories are speculative and imaginative, influenced by cultural and historical contexts. The example of deducing that "sheep are white" after observing a million white sheep illustrates the fallibility of induction. Popper's core philosophy, as you've noted, is that truth cannot be proven; only falsity can be demonstrated.
In the context of your point, this reinforces the idea that while a theory may seem accurate based on available data (a million white sheep), the inability to exhaustively test all possibilities (the existence of a single black sheep) leaves room for potential falsification and challenges the absolute precision of the definition.
Therefore, your point extrapolates the difficulty in establishing absolute precision in definitions, especially in the realm of scientific theories, where certainty is elusive and subject to the limitations of empirical evidence and the potential for falsification.
