《资治通鉴》评说

版权说明:欢迎非商业赢利目的转载转贴我的文章。转载转贴时请注明唵啊吽笔名和博客链接。
个人资料
唵啊吽 (热门博主)
  • 博客访问:
正文

地缘政治扭曲的悲情

(2010-04-19 14:01:46) 下一个
太祖说:利用小说反党是一大发明。如今,悲情竟然已经成为一种地缘政治资源,而且是被西方舆论垄断的资源。这个资源的运用,成为西方战争动员能力的重要组成部分。伊拉克人民在萨达姆统治下的悲情为美国伊拉克战争动员了国内外政治资源,而美国占领伊拉克以后的伊拉克人的更大的悲情则被西方媒体刻意抹杀。科索沃悲情是西方打击塞尔维亚的资源。车臣悲情原来被北约用来遏制俄国,结果黑寡妇恐怖事件让俄国把悲情拿来反对车臣了。2008拉萨乌鲁木齐中国人民被恐怖事件伤害的悲情被西方歪曲成西藏“国”和新疆“国”受中国“压迫”的悲情。悲情,是西方战争动员力的资源之一。

人都有恻隐之心,对于困难的弱者都或多或少地注以同情。于是,西方就按照地缘政治需要有选择地渲染自身阵营里的悲情而掩盖对手的历史悲情。西方媒体的政治正确跟风行为是很明显的,如阿富汗总统卡赛是美国的盟友,备受媒体鼓励打气,批评也是建设性的正面批评。不料卡赛诟病西方干预阿富汗选举后,霎时间西方媒体来了个180度大转弯,大肆爆料卡赛政府腐败黑暗。这充分暴露出西方所谓“媒体自由”的“民主社会基础”只不过是地缘政治的舆论机器,在“政治正确”主导下歪曲现实报道,这种为地缘政治服务的西方舆论机器中国人在2008年领教很深了,只是西方舆论机器依然故我,如今天在报道青海玉树地震的时候,依然用春秋笔法渲染藏民受中国压迫的“历史”和“现实”,把天灾的悲情偷梁换柱成“汉人压迫藏民”的悲情,而海地地震西方压榨海地的悲情则被扭为天灾悲情。以下只举西方主导的主流媒体如何渲染和隐瞒悲情来配合其地缘政治需要。

1、犹太人的悲情。犹太人在二战被希特勒屠杀是历史悲剧。人类不应该忘记这个历史悲剧。但是,如今犹太人悲情已经成为犹太人重新制造类似的历史悲剧的通行证了。虽然美以主张巴以和平要分出以色列和巴勒斯坦两个国家的解决方案,但是,如今并不存在巴勒斯坦国家,巴勒斯坦作为主权国家并不存在,联合国成员国里没有巴勒斯坦国,各国没有驻巴勒斯坦国的外交领事馆大使馆。换言之,以色列国内的西岸和加沙地带是以色列国内的种族隔离区,和二战期间德国占领波兰后建立的犹太人隔离村是一样的。巴勒斯坦难民的当今世界最大的难民营。联合国统计全球难民巴勒斯坦是第一位。然而,西方媒体可以渲染达富尔难民的悲情,绝不渲染巴勒斯坦难民悲情。他们赞美美国黑人反对种族隔离和南非反对种族隔离的非暴力运动时渲染种族隔离悲情和普世价值的“人权”,但是,对以色列违反人权地种族隔离政策却视而不见,并且大力渲染二战犹太人的悲情。每年纪念二战,犹太人悲情就被渲染一次,而二战中国的灾难,如典型的南京大屠杀,则年年在二战纪念中被忽略,偶有提到就带上日本教科书之类的质疑。当年南京上海外国列强租界里西方是见证了日本屠杀中国,见证了日本入侵是中国难民的悲惨状况,可是每年二战纪念只听到犹太人悲情,听不到中国悲情。当年被日寇屠杀的大多数是平民百姓,并非共产党,之因为他们死是中国人,在国际地缘政治中不配有悲情。

2、萨达姆种族灭绝最,罪状是屠杀了百来号人的村庄。当年西方殖民屠杀了多数村庄,有历史资料记录但没有媒体悲情纪念。当年日本在中国屠杀了多数村庄?留下多数万人坑?每年国际上纪念二战都没有媒体为中国二战苦难悲情,以至如今西方民众不知中国二战是反法西斯国家,现在西方民众反倒认为中国是法西斯国家,日本是民主良民。颠倒黑白。举一个小例子,当年日本入侵广州从三灶岛机场起飞轰炸广州,日本建三灶岛机场时把三灶岛的中国人都屠杀了。全国各地都有这些日本暴行的记录,可惜,西方民众可以数出一个一个的犹太人集中营,却不知道日本占领中国的暴行比希特勒有过之无不及,每个三灶岛惨案都和萨达姆罪行一样严重,日本在中国制造了成千的萨达姆罪行。

3、塞尔维亚种族灭绝科索沃阿尔巴尼亚族。被国际法庭审判。而98年印尼针对华裔的暴行其规模和残忍手段是塞尔维亚的百倍。印尼针对华裔种族灭绝的暴行不下于非洲索马里和达富尔等惨案,是在印尼历史上反复发生的惨案。可是,一向关怀“人权”的西方媒体对印尼惨案只是例行公事地报道一下就没有声音了。为什么?印尼又不是中国,为什么?只因为受难的是华裔。报道华裔悲情不符合地缘政治需要。美国黑人奴隶的悲情有了,美国修建跨大陆铁路的华工的悲情被掩盖了。美国不是民主人权了吗?何以历史教育对黑人和华裔要区别对待?跨大陆铁路是美国工业革命的基础设施,是华裔血汗尸骨建设出来的,是美国现代化的关键历史事件。没有悲情,只有历史书上干巴巴的学生不想记的一些文字。华裔的悲情是要被西方主流媒体掩盖的,是为了地缘政治要从人们的记忆中被模掉的。历史上违反人权的事情很多,都可以渲染强化,唯有华裔的悲情要从历史书中抹掉,因为华裔的悲情有碍美国地缘政治的舆论导向。

4、马丁路德金、曼德拉、甘地是被西方热捧的非暴力运动的典型,因为他们是弱势群体,是被压迫群体。而达赖也进入了这个典型的行列中,成西方今天鲜活鲜活的非暴力典型。可是,达赖在当年西藏是贵族僧侣的领袖,是社会的强势贵族,是暴力压迫了百万农奴,完全是甘地之类的对立面。而且他是以武装暴力叛乱来抗拒和平的非暴力的民主改革,西媒颠倒黑白莫过于此。在西方的海外学子们,你们不妨随便问一问身边的西方人,他们都会说达赖是受中国压迫的,是被暴力压迫的和平主义者和非暴力运动领袖。奇怪吧。贵族武装叛乱失败成了悲情,百万农奴长期的困难不是悲情。百万农奴比美国黑人还悲惨,他们受到活剥皮的酷刑,但是,他们在西方地缘政治舆论下不配有悲情。

5、卡廷惨案。两国交兵,波兰屠杀十万红军不分官兵,苏联屠杀两万军官而释放了士兵。结果西方记住了卡廷悲情。而且这几天卡廷悲情发挥到顶峰。屠杀俘虏是不对的。中国人们志愿军在朝鲜战场上优待俘虏,结果呢,俘虏回去讲了中国优待俘虏的情况以后呢,西方说这些人被“洗脑”了,吧中国描画成会洗脑的恶魔。比卡廷选择性悲情更为严重的,当然是日寇占领中国的三光政策,人不分男女老幼一律屠杀,比起苏联只杀军官严重多了。南京惨案,在每年国际纪念二战时都把地缘政治掩盖掉,而日本政界竟然可以煌而堂之地参拜神社祭奠战犯。西方虽然没有像卡廷惨案那样渲染战犯的悲情,毕竟日本还轰炸了珍珠港,在广岛长崎挨了两颗原子弹。但西方媒体毕竟也没有谴责这种为战犯招魂的日本悲情,他们太热衷于渲染中国军事“强大”的“侵略性”而不在乎日本渲染战犯悲情。如果不是珍珠港和广岛长崎,我想西方各国政要也会和日本天皇一起为战犯悲情一番的,有如今天西方各国政要要参加波兰总统遇难丧礼一样。日本的武士道就是他们的辉煌历史,正如今天我们依然可以在西方图书馆里读到英国辉煌的鸦片战争历史一样。昨天想看看东印度公司的资料,图书馆一本很权威的书题目是《荣耀的东印度公司》。东印度公司在印度拥有自己的军队,实际统治了印度,种植鸦片走私到中国,为大英帝国立下汗马功劳,所以有荣耀。殖民地人民的苦难是不配有悲情的,悲情属于地缘政治中西方垄断的舆论资源。

西方媒体刻意清洗华裔历史和现实的悲情是为随时发动对华战争埋下的伏笔。当年海南岛间谍机事件,美国媒体为13个间谍发悲情,把13个间谍塑造成美国在伊朗受难的人质一样,只要美国政府振臂一呼,全美国人民可以一夜之间就全力支持对华战争。美国60%的海军集中在没有战事的太平洋西部,依然有能力在认何时候以任何借口对华发动战争而得到美国人民和其盟国人民一致支持,因为西方媒体的悲情运作已经为西方对华战争做好了长期的仇恨情绪灌输。

制造了南京大屠杀惨案真正元凶为何逍遥法外?(图)
[ 打印 ]
阅读 ()评论 (12)
评论
唵啊吽 回复 悄悄话 回复HCC的评论:

I do not agree your arguments. It was true many people died during Cultural Revolution and I agree Communist government was responsible for that. Chinese people and Communist China have all admitted that. Just like every year many people died of gun crime in US. US people and government admit the fact and everybody know that it’s the reasonability of US government to reduce the gun crimes. When you said Communist China kills more people than Nanking massacre, however, is just the same as to said that democratic America kills more American than 911 attract, as every year about 10 thousands of American was killed in gun crimes.

The difference between Culture Revelation as well as three years of disaster and Nanking massacre is just the same as between US gun crimes and 911. One is due to social instability and government policies, and other is due to foreign invasion. During Culture Revolution, the death rate is much higher for government officials and CCP officials than the rate in other group. When you said communist China kills more people than Nanking massacre is just like to say Democratic America is killing more America than 911. During three years of disaster, many poor Chinese died of hunger, Chinese people know that, and Chinese government know that, and they all know something is not correct, just like US people know that so many gun crimes in US is not correct. There are more poor people died in three years of disaster than government officials is just like there are more poor people fall as gun crimes victims in US. There must be some communists died during three years of disasters, and many who died have relatives as communists. As you know, during civil war in China, it was the most poor who joint the Communist Party. And 1959 was only 10 year after civil war and majority of Chinese population was still in countryside. At that time, most of government and party officials were come from the countryside and come from poor families. If you really want to say someone intentionally killed Chinese people during 1959-1961 and Cultural Revolution, then it should be United States and Soviet Union. They succeed in putting economic sanction on China, which led to humanitarian disasters indirectly.

Communist China is bad. Chinese know it. But Chinese are not foolish enough to overthrow it, as they know that the present China is still the best among all other forms of governments they tried since Opium War. Since Opium War, Chinese tried democracy under Sun Yet-sent but all the Western countries just support local war lords in China to extent their state interest at the expense of Chinese democracy and at the expense of Chinese people. That’s why Dr. Sun turned to Soviet and welcomed Communist in China.

In the last a few decades, poverty population reduced all over the world, and China made the number one contribution. Many poor peasants of yesterday are now rich entrepreneurs in China, thanks to market economy adapted by Communist China. Regardless your label of China as communist or capitalist, the present China works for the better of Chinese and the world.

Also, I am not satisfied by your answer. I am asking the name who was responsible for Nanking massacre as people name Hitler for the responsibility of massacre of Jews. You should name Shōwa for the responsibility of Naking massacre. Every year, when people condemn the massacre of Jews during WWII they condemn Hitler. Hitler is notorious all over the world, while the emperor family of Japan who is responsible for Nanking massacre is still enjoying inherited high social privilege. It is against all the human morality. I believe man should be born equal and inherited social privileges should be discarded. Especially the one who is responsible for the Nanking massacre.
HCC 回复 悄悄话 Excuse, me, did you even read what I wrote? From your response I could only presume you have no idea what I said in my last response. But if you insist on a response, then here:


(1): Exact opposite to your presumption, here's what I am really asking:

GCD caused far more deaths of the Chinese people than the Japanese. So, please answer me: why don't you think the GCD should be responsible for its actions?


(2): Are you asking me who was responsible for the Nanking massacre? Of course it's the Japanese government! (Do you not know that? Are you really Chinese?)


(3): Sorry but I do admit that I don't know very many Chinese "surfer" or the "surfering" that they do. Surfing looks fun although I've never tried it. If you know so much about surfing since the opium war, you are welcome to write an article about it too.


(If there's something you want to say, why don't you say it in Chinese. I can read and understand it.)
唵啊吽 回复 悄悄话 回复HCC的评论:
I can see where you are heading to. What you imply is that Chinese was beeter off by living under Japanese occupation than living in Communist China.What I can say is that you are out of touch with reality.

By the way, you still cannot name the one who was responsible for Naking Massacre, despite that you cited so many Western Media reports.

Come on, say it. I would also like to hear from you who is reaponsible for the surfering of Chinese since Opium War and before Communist ever come into China, from the West!
HCC 回复 悄悄话 (1): The GCD government is responsible for the death of ten of millions of the Chinese people. Is it okay because some of them happen to be communist as well?


(2): On the other hand, many of the ones who starved during the Great Leap Forward were not party members. Mind you, more Chinese people died during 1958-1961 than during the Nanking massacre.


(3): If you don't even care about the death of your own people, why should the western media care?


(4): On the other hand, the western media is aware of the sacrifices of the Chinese people. Take Nanking massacre, for example. There is an abundance of western media reporting on it. I would suggest you to first look at the following before claiming "western media did not report":

From Times:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/system/topicRoot/The_Rape_of_Nanking/

From BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7140357.stm

From Newsweek:
http://www.newsweek.com/id/97533

A film on Nanking massacre, made and directed by Americans:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0893356/

Here's another one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoW2WYdOsvg



(5): "the sacrifice Chinese people made during II World War and the surfers Chinese endured since opium war." ?

I will admit that I do not know much about the "surfers" that the Chinese had to endure since opium war. I will agree with you and presume that they surfed really poorly.
mae 回复 悄悄话 说得好!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
唵啊吽 回复 悄悄话 回复HCC的评论:
Your statement of "The communist China itself killed millions and millions of its own people, first in 1958-1961, and then 1966-1976." omits something too. You should say that the communist China itself killed millions of communists during 1966-1976.

But thanks for ask me to add another example: When the western media loves to talk about the humanity disasters during 1958-1961 and 1967-1976 in China, they are unwilling to mention the sacrifice Chinese people made during II World War and the surfers Chinese endured since opium war.

Your second point is just confused yourself and readers. My article is talking media, and you change it to government. Just because U.S. congress passed a resolution to condemn Japan for the Nanking massacre doesn’t mean the media will talk about it. In fact, the media may distort the reality to the opposite. For example, U.S. government state several times that Taiwan and Tibet are part of China, while media create a impression that Taiwan and Tibet are separate countries from China. Yes, U.S. congress passed a resolution to condemn Japan for the Nanking massacre, but how many time it mention Nanking massacre when condemning Fascists brutal acts during II world war? Mostly they just condemn Hitler. We all know Hitler is bad for killing Jewish people, but how many people know the name who is responsible for Nanking massacre just like people know Hitler when taking about Jewish’s misery? Can you tell me the name who is responsible for Nanking massacre?

HCC 回复 悄悄话 >>>当年日本在中国屠杀了多数村庄?留下多数万人坑?每年国际上纪念二战都没有媒体为中国二战苦难悲情,以至如今西方民众不知中国二战是反法西斯国家,现在西方民众反倒认为中国是法西斯国家

You seem to have forgotten the fact that the "China" back then was overtaken by the communist "China" later. The communist China itself killed millions and millions of its own people, first in 1958-1961, and then 1966-1976. I don't see that being remembered in your articles either.

Not to mention, you also seem to have forgotten that the U.S. congress passed a resolution to condemn Japan for the Nanking massacre. Your allegation against the West for neglecting the suffering of the Chinese is not supported by clear evidence to the contrary.
julienmum 回复 悄悄话 Good!
河里的石头1 回复 悄悄话 说得好,顶一下!
登录后才可评论.