个人资料
正文

安省省长福特再次推动“城堡法”并扩大自卫权

(2025-09-04 17:19:51) 下一个

安大略省省长道格·福特再次推动“城堡法”并扩大自卫权

CSSA 2025年8月21日 2条评论

https://cssa-cila.org/ontario-premier-doug-ford-renews-push-for-castle-law-and-expanded-self-protection-rights/

安大略省省长道格·福特再次成为头条新闻,他再次推动所谓的“城堡法”,该法将承认安大略省居民保卫自己和家园的权利。此举引发了关于加拿大人在面对入侵者时应该采取何种程度的激烈争论。
周三在女王公园,福特指出引人注目的入室盗窃和暴力事件激增,并表示许多人现在“在自己的家中感到恐惧”。他认为,加拿大现行的法律不足以保护那些反击入室盗窃的人。

“你应该有权保护你的家人和家,而不必担心最终会被戴上手铐,”福特告诉记者。“如??果有人闯入你的家,你不应该犹豫是否要保护自己或你所爱的人。”

“城堡法”究竟是什么?

这个概念源于一句老话:“家就是城堡。”在美国,“城堡法”或“城堡原则”赋予房主广泛的法律保护,如果他们使用武力——甚至是致命武力——来保护自己的财产免受入侵者侵害。大多数拥有此类法律的州都给予免于起诉的权利。

近年来,加拿大在这方面划定了更为严格的界限。

加拿大的自卫机制

《刑法》第34条允许加拿大人使用“合理”的武力来保护自己、他人或他们的财产。但有一个问题:武力必须与威胁程度相匹配。只有当致命武力确实是防止死亡或重伤的唯一方法时,它才是正当的。如果有人伤害或杀死了入室盗窃者,警方将调查房主的行为是否“合理且适度”。法律并没有自动保护——而且,有人后来因法院认定其行为过激而被起诉。

这一标准引发了几起颇具争议的案件,一些加拿大人在法官裁定他们使用过度武力保卫家园后被定罪。

《幸运驼鹿法案》:加拿大的变奏

这场辩论中一个值得注意的时刻发生在2009年的“幸运驼鹿”案之后,当时多伦多店主David Chen对一名惯犯实施了公民逮捕。Chen被控袭击和强制监禁。公众的强烈反对促成了C-26法案(即“幸运驼鹿法案”)的出台,该法案修改了法律,赋予企业主和房主在实施公民逮捕和保卫财产方面更清晰的规则和更大的自由度。尽管如此,它还没有像美国式的城堡法那样走得那么远。使用的武力仍然需要合理,致命武力仍然受到严格限制。

政治热点

福特的最新举措正值其他省份面临同样的争论之际,尤其是在一些引人注目的案件之后,例如2016年萨斯喀彻温省科尔顿·布希枪击案,以及2018年新斯科舍省一名枪杀入侵者的男子被无罪释放。

掌握《刑法》的联邦政府迄今为止一直拒绝接受向美国式城堡法靠拢的呼声。

福特表示他不会退缩。“我们需要把守法的房主放在罪犯之上,”他说。“安大略省的家庭应该感到安全。”

随着公共安全成为人们关注的焦点,福特的言论很可能会将这个问题置于公众的关注中心。

Ontario Premier Doug Ford Renews Push for 'Castle Law' and Expanded Self-Protection Rights

 August 21, 2025 2Comments

https://cssa-cila.org/ontario-premier-doug-ford-renews-push-for-castle-law-and-expanded-self-protection-rights/

Ontario Premier Doug Ford is making headlines again, reviving his push for a so-called “castle law” that would recognize the rights of Ontarians to defend themselves and their homes. It’s a move sparking heated debate about just how far Canadians should be able to go when faced with an intruder.

At Queen’s Park on Wednesday, Ford pointed to a spike in high-profile break-ins and violent incidents, saying many people are now “afraid in their own homes.” He argues Canada’s current laws don’t go far enough to protect those who fight back against home invasions.

“You should have the right to protect your family and your home without worrying you’ll end up in handcuffs,” Ford told reporters. “If someone breaks into your house, you shouldn’t have to second-guess defending yourself or your loved ones.”

What Exactly Is a ‘Castle Law’?

The idea comes from the old saying: “A man’s home is his castle.” In the U.S., “castle laws” or “castle doctrine” give homeowners broad legal protection if they use force — even deadly force — to defend their property against intruders. Most states with these laws grant immunity from prosecution.

Canada has drawn a tighter line in recent times.

How Self-Defence Works in Canada

Section 34 of the Criminal Code lets Canadians use “reasonable” force to defend themselves, others, or their property. But here’s the catch: the force has to match the threat. Lethal force is only justified if it’s truly the only way to prevent death or grave injury. If someone injures or kills a home intruder, police will investigate to see if the homeowner’s actions were “reasonable and proportionate.” There’s no automatic legal shield — and people have been charged when courts later decided they went too far.

This standard has led to several controversial cases, with some Canadians convicted after judges ruled they used excessive force to defend their homes.

The Lucky Moose Bill: A Canadian Twist

One notable moment in this debate came after the 2009 “Lucky Moose” case, when Toronto shopkeeper David Chen made a citizen’s arrest on a repeat shoplifter. Chen was charged with assault and forcible confinement. The public backlash led to Bill C-26, known as the “Lucky Moose Bill,” which changed the law to give business owners and homeowners more clarity and leeway on making citizen’s arrests and defending property. Still, it didn’t go as far as the U.S.-style castle doctrine. The force used still needs to be reasonable, and deadly force remains tightly restricted.

A Political Flashpoint

Ford’s latest push arrives as other provinces wrestle with the same debate, especially after headline-grabbing cases like the 2016 shooting of Colten Boushie in Saskatchewan and the 2018 acquittal of a Nova Scotia man who shot an intruder.

The federal government — which controls the Criminal Code — has so far resisted calls to move toward American-style castle laws.

Ford says he’s not backing down. “We need to put law-abiding homeowners ahead of criminals,” he said. “Ontario families deserve to feel safe.”

With public safety on people’s minds, Ford’s message is likely to keep the issue front and center.

[ 打印 ]
评论
目前还没有任何评论
登录后才可评论.