今天的物理学界怎么这么白痴加不要脸？

不久前我将我的一篇题为“The Fall of Special Relativity and The Absoluteness of Space and Time”【[1]】的文章投稿给The European Physical Journal Plus。今天收到他们的编辑的报告说我在文章引用了Gibbs在1995年的文章，而Gibbs文章是支持光速不变的，所以我的文章一定错了。

这个编辑是根本没有阅读能力还是吃错药了还是要么就是白痴？？？

我在那篇文章中引用的文献何止那一篇说光速是常量？这与我否定光速是常量有什么关系？我在中文文章中也照样引用过Gibbs的那篇文章，我用那篇文章是为了说明不仅我从未找到过爱因斯坦说在引力场中光速不是常量，而且其他人如Gibbs也没找到。至于Gibbs他自己是否认为光速是常量关我的文章个屁事？？？

那个编辑不去读我的文章的相关论述，而专门在Gibbs的文章中找出GIbbs认为光速是常量的部分来。他怎么就跳过了Gibbs文章中提到没有人证明爱因斯坦说引力场中的光速是常量那部分呢？这到底是无赖还是白痴呢？？？

他怎么把Gibbs个人的观点看得比爱因斯坦还重？？难道Gibbs是他爷爷？？？

今天欧美的物理学杂志的编辑怎么就那么无赖加白痴呢？？？？

下面是那个白痴的comment:

【The author spends a long time arguing against the constancy of the speed of light (denoted by "c"). But the author's references include:

Gibbs, P. (1996). “Is The Speed of Light Constant?”. Updated by Carlip S. (1997). Retrieved

from:

https://www.desy.de/user/projects/Physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html

To quote from that reference.

"In special relativity, the speed of light is constant when measured in any inertial frame.  In general relativity, the appropriate generalisation is that the speed of light is constant in any freely falling reference frame (in a region small enough that tidal effects can be neglected)."

"If general relativity is correct, then the constancy of the speed of light in inertial frames is a tautology from the geometry of spacetime.  The causal structure of the universe is determined by the geometry of "null vectors".  Travelling at the speed c means following world-lines tangent to these null vectors.  The use of c as a conversion between units of metres and seconds, as in the SI definition of the metre, is fully justified on theoretical grounds as well as practical terms, because c is not merely the speed of light, it is a fundamental feature of the geometry of spacetime."

The author should heed his references.】

上面这段评论是该编辑是无赖加白痴的证据。下面是他低水平的直接表现：

【

This paper presents a number of "contradictions" in the now standard understanding of Special Relativity (SR), and in smaller space some "carry-over" misunderstandings of General Relativity (GR). These are issues that were argued in the decades after the introduction of Special Relativity, and were well settled, even though still disputed by "hold outs" 45 years after the publication of SR. But there is no coherent argument against the standard SR/GR interpretations at this time.

In particular this paper presents none. For instance the author argues against Einstein's definition of simultaneity in SR. He argues against the use of observation of muons at the surface of the Earth as demonstration of SR -- arguing that analysing from a frame moving with the muon leads to a contradiction to an analysis done in a frame on the surface of the Earth. That statement is INCORRECT.

】

他居然用我的文章对抗了现有的理论为理由来否定我的文章！什么东西呀！你有本事说出我错在哪里，你个X八X，居然说只要违背了现有的理论就是错！这就是今天的欧美物理学界的水平？？？！！！-----这个欧洲物理学杂志的编辑部在美国，所以他们的水平就是欧美的综合水平的代表！！！

 

---

[[1]] Dai, R. (2022). “The Fall of Special Relativity and The Absoluteness of Space and Time”. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363582341_The_Fall_of_Special_Relativity_and_The_Absoluteness_of_Space_and_Time

[慕容青草]

其实，从我在“找到他们修改爱因斯坦广相假设的原因了”和“广义相对论看来也问题重重”的讨论可以看出，今天的物理学界之所以必须假设在重力场中的光速为常量是因为爱因斯坦他自己一面假设重力场中的光速可以是变量一面要求ds为不随坐标变换而改变的invariant造成的，根本不是Gibbs那个可笑的逻辑决定的。Gibbs的论述不过是中学生或最多是大本的照本宣科的水平而已，而这样的水平正好适合今天欧美的物理学界，所以那位白痴编辑就转门引用了Gibbs的狗屁不通的论述，而跳过Gibbs在同一篇文章中提到的爱因斯坦本人认为重力场中的光速不是常量这一点。真是XX的不要脸！！！！

[慕容青草]

下面这句话就是我在那篇文章中提到Gibbs的文章的片段：

【

However, it is interesting to notice that we even cannot find any proof that Einstein ever claimed that the speed of light in the gravitational field is constant (Gibbs 1996 [[i]]); instead, we can see from multiple writings (Einstein1916, 1912b [4, [ii]]) that Einstein reasoned why we could not assume the constancy of the speed of light in the gravitational field.

[[i]] Gibbs, P. (1996). “Is The Speed of Light Constant?”. Updated by Carlip S. (1997). Retrieved from: https://www.desy.de/user/projects/Physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html

[[ii]] Einstein, A. (1912b) “The speed of light and the statics of the gravitational field”. Translated by D. H. Delphenich.“Lichtgeschwindigkeit und Statik des Gravitionsfeldes,” Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 38 (1912), 355-369. Available at: http://neo-classical-physics.info/uploads/3/4/3/6/34363841/einstein_-_speed_of_light_and_grav.pdf

】

下面这段是Gibbs那篇文章中唯一与我一致的地方，也是我提到他的文章的原因：

【

Einstein went on to discover a more general theory of relativity which explained gravity in terms of curved spacetime, and he talked about the speed of light changing in this new theory. In the 1920 book "Relativity: the special and general theory" he wrote: . . . according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity [. . .] cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position. Since Einstein talks of velocity (a vector quantity: speed with direction) rather than speed alone, it is not clear that he meant the speed will change, but the reference to special relativity suggests that he did mean so. This interpretation is perfectly valid and makes good physical sense, but a more modern interpretation is that the speed of light is constant in general relativity.

】

X的，那个X八X编辑跳过这个关键的地方，专挑Gibbs他自己认为光速必须是常量的地方。。。。人人都知道爱因斯坦，谁知道他Gibbs是谁呀。。。。那个X八X编辑那Gibbs的话来不但否定我的话也否定了爱因斯坦。。。。这个编辑真是个白痴加无赖------这就是今天欧美物理学界的水平！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！