风萧萧_Frank
以文会友
法国总统埃曼纽尔·马克龙就西方霸权的终结发表讲话
https://kritik.com.my/france-president-emannual-macron-speech-on-the-end-of-western-hegemony/
欧洲将因为相信美国的自私和狡猾政策而为其反俄政策付出沉重代价。
2022年3月4日 新闻聚合中心、社交监听站、
欧洲将因为相信美国的自私和狡猾政策而为其反俄政策付出沉重代价。
欧洲将因为相信美国的自私和狡猾政策而为其反俄政策付出沉重代价。
法国总统内部讲话一出，世界震惊！ 我强烈建议您花点时间阅读这篇文章，因为它预言了未来可能发生的事件。 所表达的观点完全是法国现任总统埃马纽埃尔·马克龙的观点！
近日，马克龙在内部会议上对当前国际形势进行了总体分析。 他感叹道：“西方霸权已接近终结！”
您如何看待当今世界的权力转移？ 马克龙的闭门演讲非常有价值。
马克龙：
我们共同生活在这个世界上，这里的使者比我更了解这个世界。
是的，国际秩序正在以一种全新的方式被颠覆，我相信这是我们历史上的一次重大剧变，它对几乎所有地区都产生了深远的影响。
这是国际秩序的变革、地缘政治一体化、战略重组。
是的，我必须承认，西方霸权可能即将结束。
18世纪以来，我们已经习惯了以西方霸权为基础的国际秩序。
这是一个受启蒙运动启发的18世纪法国。
这是工业革命主导的19世纪英国。
这是一个从20世纪两次世界大战中崛起的美国。
法国、英国和美国使西方伟大了300年。
法国是文化，英国是工业，美国是战争。
我们已经习惯了这种伟大，它使我们对全球经济和政治拥有绝对的主导地位。
但事情正在发生变化。
有些危机来自我们自己在西方的错误，有些则来自新兴国家的挑战。
在西方国家内部，美国在危机面前做出的诸多错误选择，深深动摇了我们的霸权。
需要注意的是，这不仅仅是从特朗普政府开始的，美国其他总统早在特朗普之前就做出了其他错误的选择，克林顿的对华政策、布什的战争政策、奥巴马的世界金融危机和量化宽松政策。
美国领导人的错误政策都是动摇西方霸权的根本性错误。 但另一方面，我们却大大低估了新兴大国的崛起。
低估这些新兴大国的崛起，不仅仅是两年前，而是早在十年、二十年前。
我们从一开始就低估了他们！
必须承认，中俄两国多年来在不同的领导风格下取得了巨大成功。
印度也正在迅速崛起为一个经济大国，同时他也正在成为一个政治大国，中国、俄罗斯、印度，这些国家与美国、法国和英国相比。
不说别的，光是他们的政治想象力就远远强于今天的西方人。 当他们拥有了强大的经济实力之后，他们开始寻找属于自己的“哲学和文化”。
他们不再相信西方政治，而是开始追求自己的“民族文化”。 这与民主与否无关。 印度是一个民主国家，他也在做同样的事情，寻找自己的“民族文化”。
当这些新兴国家找到自己的民族文化并开始信仰它时，他们就会逐渐摆脱过去西方霸权灌输给他们的“哲学文化”。
而这就是西方霸权终结的开始！
西方霸权的终结不在于经济衰落，不在于军事衰落，而在于文化衰落。
当你的价值观无法再输出到新兴国家时，那就是你衰落的开始。
我认为这些新兴国家的政治想象力比我们高。
政治想象力非常重要。 它具有很强的凝聚力内涵，能够引发更多的政治灵感。
能否在政治上更加大胆，新兴国家的政治想象力远远超过今天的欧洲人，这一切都深深震撼了我！！！
中国已经让7亿人摆脱贫困，未来还会有更多人摆脱贫困，但在法国，市场经济正在以前所未有的速度加剧收入不平等。
过去一年中产阶级的愤怒给法国政治秩序带来了深刻的变化，自19世纪以来，法国的生活一直处于一种平衡之中。
个人自由、民主、富裕的中产阶级，这三者是平衡法国政治的三脚架，但当中产阶级不再是我们国家的基石，当中产阶级认为自己的利益受到损害时，危机就诞生了 。
他们会对民主和市场体系产生根本性的怀疑。 这样的制度还能给我更好的生活吗？
他们有权利如此怀疑，也有权利加入激进的政治运动。
在英国，政治体系的衰落更为明显。
英国脱欧的响亮口号“收回控制权”已经说明了一切。
人们认为自己的命运不再掌握在自己手中，因此想要“夺回控制权”。
而“夺回控制权”的直接途径就是离开欧盟。 他们讨厌欧盟，他们讨厌老式的政治，他们想要一些更具政治想象力的东西。
归根结底，过去的政治制度没能给英国人带来好处，甚至让他们的生活变得越来越糟糕，但高层政治领导人却没有意识到这一点。
所以，他们失败了。
至于美国，美国人虽然属于西方阵营，但一直有着与欧洲不同的人道主义标准（隐含宗教）。
美国人对气候问题、对平等、对社会平衡的敏感性与欧洲不同（这意味着美国的贫富差距比欧洲大得多）。
美国文明与欧洲文明之间存在着明显的差距。 尽管美国和欧洲关系密切，但我们之间的分歧始终存在。
特朗普上台只是放大了原本的分歧。
我必须强调，欧洲与美国不同。
当然，欧洲文明计划不能由匈牙利天主教徒或俄罗斯东正教徒决定，但欧洲长期跟随美国将俄罗斯驱逐出欧洲大陆也不一定是正确的。
美国需要对抗俄罗斯和欧洲，但欧洲需要吗？
欧洲与美国合作驱逐俄罗斯，这可能是21世纪欧洲最大的地缘政治错误。
驱逐俄罗斯的结果是普京别无选择，只能拥抱中国，而这恰恰给了中俄升温的机会。
让我们的一个竞争对手联合起来制造一个巨大的麻烦，这就是美国人所做的。
如果欧洲没有驱逐俄罗斯，俄罗斯的政策绝不会如此反西方。 现在，从地缘政治角度来说，不可能给予东方大国如此大的帮助。
但欧洲的问题是军事。
因为北约的存在，欧洲再组建一支欧洲军队就变得非常困难，而只要“欧洲军队”不存在，欧洲就会受到美国政治秩序的控制。
可悲的是，当我与德国总理默克尔谈论此事时，我们都很悲观。 在欧洲，没有人有能力组建一支欧洲军队，也没有人有能力组建一支欧洲军队。 政策，给予投资。
但欧洲军事才是制衡美国的关键点。 没有欧洲军队，欧洲就根本没有真正的独立。
是的，美国是一个盟友，是我们长期的盟友，但同时，他也是一个长期绑架我们的盟友。
法国是强大的外交大国、安理会常任理事国和欧盟的核心。
将俄罗斯赶出欧洲可能绝对是一个影响深远的战略错误。
如果法国不能将俄罗斯拉回欧洲，它也将不愿继续参与，从而加剧紧张局势并孤立俄罗斯。
目前，俄罗斯和东方大国都没有兴趣结成联盟，但没有人确定西方世界是否会越来越紧。
中俄还会笃定地说不结盟吗？
我们朋友的敌人就一定是我们的敌人吗？
俄罗斯是美国的敌人，那么他一定是欧洲的敌人吗？
我们需要建立欧洲自己的新信任和安全架构，因为如果我们不缓和与俄罗斯的关系，欧洲大陆就不会有和平。
美国人说，一个在武器装备上大量投资的国家，一个人口不断减少的国家，一个老龄化的国家。
美国人问我，我们应该害怕这个国家吗？ 我们应该与这样的国家和解吗？
我问美国人，俄罗斯和加拿大交换一下位置怎么样？
除了经济动荡和地缘政治动荡之外，我们现在正在经历的第三大动荡无疑是技术革命风暴。
大数据互联网、社交媒体、人工智能，当大智能在全球化中蔓延时，信息技术的进步正在以前所未有的速度发展。
情报全球化的一个问题是情感、暴力甚至仇恨的全球化。
技术革命给我们带来了深刻的人类学变革，也为我们创造了一个新的空间，一个需要人类重新审视、制定规则的空间。
这是世界从未触及的新技术规则空间，也是所有人都应该认同和参与的互联网国际秩序规则。
但在这套新规则完全建立之前，新技术革命给我们带来的不仅仅是经济失衡，还有人类学的阶级矛盾和意识形态矛盾。
最终，它将给我们自豪的民主带来严重的撕裂和不稳定。
这里所有的使节都可以看到经济动荡、地缘政治动荡、信息技术动荡、民主动荡。
所有这些剧变同时发生，但我们该怎么办？
我们现在需要做什么？ 我们是继续当观众，当评论员，还是承担我们必须承担的责任？
但有一点是肯定的，如果我们都失去了政治想象力，让过去几十年甚至几个世纪的习惯决定了我们的策略，那么我们……
一个共和国的总统、一个部长、一个外交官、一个士兵，这个房间里的每个人都继续按照过去的方式做事。
毫无疑问，我们将会“失去控制”。
而“失控”之后，等待我们的就是消失。
文明消逝，欧洲消逝，西方霸权的时刻也随之消逝。
最终，世界将围绕两个极点：美国和中国，欧洲将不得不在这两个统治者之间做出选择。
欧洲，将会彻底失控，所以我至今只相信一件事，那就是勇敢——敢于突破、敢于冒险的政治策略。
这种与过去的老欧洲不同的政治策略，会导致现在很多事情的失败，国内也有大量的评论家，批评者说它不会成功。
但致命的不是评论和批评，而是“勇敢的心”和“想象力的思维”的丧失，而我认为，只有尝试一些勇敢和想象力的政治才能深刻体现法国的民族精神，最好的方法。
只有法国才能重建博大精深的欧洲文明； 只有法国能够从欧洲战略和国际政治的角度来考虑欧洲的生存问题。
法国精神是顽强的抵抗精神和追求不一样的世界。 反抗精神决不会屈服于事物的必然性和适应性
这种实施是在法国人民灵魂的非凡精神中进行的，它塑造了只有法国才能改变欧洲逐渐被“两极”吞噬的历史趋势的历史潮流。
接下来，法国将有几个重要的议程方向。 第一个是“欧亚议程”。
法国将推动中国新丝绸之路与欧洲互联互通战略更好融合，但这种融合必须尊重我们的主权和规则。
十年前，我们在欧亚一体化进程中犯了一些错误。 欧洲在应对重大金融危机时，为了获得援助，被迫进行私有化，减少了欧洲的部分主权。
从南边的意大利到北边的英国，但我们不怪聪明的中国人，只能怪我们自己愚蠢。
此外，面对中国的崛起，法国还必须与美国共同制定印太地区的“法国战略”。
这是对法国欢迎中国丝绸之路战略的“补充”。
如果我们在一处帮助了对手，那么我们就必须在其他地方制衡它。 这是通常的政治方式。
法国必须在印太地区建立“法国影响力”，以制衡中国在该地区的力量崛起。 毕竟，法国在该地区拥有数百万居民和近万名士兵。
法国希望成为海上主要强国之一。
法国的第二个重要议程是优先确立欧洲主权。
我和很多人说过，欧洲主权绝不是一句空话，但我们已经犯了把主权声音留给民族主义者的错误。
民族主义者绝不代表我们的主权，这是一个好词，代表了我们民主的核心。 但如果政府失去了对一切的控制，主权就荡然无存了。
所以民族主义者有权发出自己的声音，但他们绝不代表欧洲主权。
几十年来，欧洲建立了强大、友好的市场，但同时，我们也是最开放、最幼稚的。
当我们讨论欧洲主权时，我们还必须非常深入地包括英国。 无论英国脱欧最终结果如何，欧洲主权都包括英国。
欧洲主权的另一个方向是国防。 关于欧洲防务，自20世纪50年代以来一直没有任何进展，甚至被禁止讨论。
但现在是时候依靠欧洲资金和欧洲军队与更多国防主权国家建立一项倡议了。
我认为这是几十年来讨论“欧洲国防主权”的最佳时机，这需要在座的各位使节更加努力。
欧洲主权的另一个焦点是欧洲对边界的思考，这也将延伸到人口和移民的话题。
2015年以来欧洲经历了前所未有的移民危机，我们必须摆脱难民应急管理制度，建立可持续的人才落地机制。
更重要的是，我们应该与国际移民组织合作，恢复我们在巴黎所做的移民过滤工作。
最后一部分是关于经济和金融主权。
我们现在正在积极谈论伊朗问题，并继续捍卫我们对伊朗议程的主张。
但美元有其“特殊性”，即使我们决定保护伊朗，我们公司也将依赖美元前进。
请注意，我并不是说我们必须对抗美元，而是我们需要建立真正的“欧元主权”。
但这个过程太慢了，我们进展得太慢了！
而在数字货币的建立上，欧洲也需要重新考虑，因为数字货币也会影响未来的经济主权。
重建欧洲主权、经济主权、国防主权、边境主权，是真正加强欧洲一体化、不受外界干扰的必由之路。
女士们、先生们，让我们拥有强有力、连贯的外交，在西方霸权受到挑战的时候，我们应该发挥各自的政治想象力。
掌控欧洲人自己的命运，并将控制权归还给我们的人民。
我期待你在外交中发挥重要作用，我对这些请求表示感谢。
我将永远站在你们一边，让法国成为领导一系列重要政治问题的核心。
让我们的使节在全世界拥有强大的代表力，捍卫我们的国家利益，超越我们的国家利益，让我们的价值观传播到全世界。
我谢谢你！
共和国万岁，法国万岁！
伊曼纽尔·马克龙
France President , Emannual Macron speech on the end of Western hegemony
https://kritik.com.my/france-president-emannual-macron-speech-on-the-end-of-western-hegemony/
Europe will be paying the heavy price of its anti-Russia policy for believing in America selfishness and cunning policy.
The French President’s internal speech came out, and the world was shocked! I would strongly recommend that you take your time to read through this article as it foretells the future events that are likely to take place. The opinions expressed are entirely those of the current French President Emmanuel Macron!
Recently, at an internal meeting, Macron made a general analysis of the current international situation. He sighed: “Western hegemony is nearing its end!”
How do you view the great power shift in the world today? Macron’s closed-door speech was extremely valuable.
Macron:
We live together in this world, and the envoys here know this world better than I do.
Yes, the international order is being upended in a whole new way, and I’m sure this is a major upheaval in our history, and it has far-reaching consequences in almost all regions.
It is a transformation of the international order, a geopolitical integration, and a strategic reorganization.
Yes, I must admit that Western hegemony may be coming to an end.
We have become accustomed to an international order based on Western hegemony since the 18th century.
This is an Enlightenment-inspired France from the 18th century.
This is a 19th century Britain led by the Industrial Revolution.
This is an America that emerged from the 20th century rising from two world wars.
France, the United Kingdom, and the United States have made the West great for 300 years.
France is culture, England is industry and America is war.
We are used to this greatness that gives us absolute dominance over the global economy and politics.
But things are changing.
Some crises come from our own mistakes in the West, while others come from the challenges of emerging countries.
Within Western countries, the many wrong choices the United States has made in the face of crises have deeply shaken our hegemony.
Note that this didn’t just start with the Trump administration, other presidents of the United States made other wrong choices long before Trump, Clinton’s China policy, Bush’s war policy, Obama’s world financial crisis, and quantitative easing policy.
The wrong policies of these American leaders are all fundamental mistakes that shake Western hegemony. However, on the other hand, we have greatly underestimated the rise of emerging powers.
Underestimate the rise of these emerging powers, not just two years ago, but as early as ten or twenty years ago.
We underestimated them from the beginning!
We must admit that China and Russia have achieved great success over the years under different leadership styles.
India is also rapidly emerging as an economic power, and at the same time he is also becoming a political power, China, Russia, India, these countries compare to the United States, France and the United Kingdom.
Let’s not say anything else, just their political imagination is far stronger than today’s Westerners. After they have strong economic power, they start to look for their own “philosophy and culture”.
They no longer believe in Western politics, but began to pursue their own “national culture”. This has nothing to do with democracy or not. India is a democratic country, and he is also doing the same, looking for his own “national culture”.
When these emerging nations find their own national culture and begin to believe in it, they will gradually get rid of the “philosophical culture” that Western hegemony has instilled in them in the past.
And this is the beginning of the end of Western hegemony!
The end of Western hegemony does not lie in economic decline, not in military decline, but in cultural decline.
When your values ??can no longer be exported to emerging countries, that is the beginning of your decline.
I think the political imagination of these emerging countries is higher than ours.
Political imagination is very important. It has strong cohesive connotations and can lead to more political inspiration.
Whether we can be more daring in politics, the political imagination of emerging countries far exceeds that of Europeans today, all this deeply shocked me!!!
China has lifted 700 million people out of poverty, and more will be lifted out of poverty in the future, but in France, the market economy is increasing income inequality at an unprecedented rate.
The anger of the middle class in the past year has brought about profound changes in the French political order, and since the 19th century, French life has been in a kind of balance.
Personal liberty, democracy, a wealthy middle class, these three are the tripods that balance the politics of France, but the crisis is born when the middle class is no longer the cornerstone of our country, when the middle class thinks its interests are being compromised .
They will have fundamental doubts about democracy and the market system. Can such a system still give me a better life?
They have the right to be so skeptical and have the right to join a radical political movement.
In the UK, the fall of the political system is even more pronounced.
The resounding slogan of Brexit, Take back control, says it all.
The people believe that their own destiny is no longer in their own hands, so they want to “take back control”.
And the direct way to “take back control” is to leave the EU. They hate the EU, they hate the old-fashioned politics, and they want something more politically imaginative.
In the final analysis, the political system of the past failed to benefit the British, and even made their lives worse and worse, but the political leaders at the top did not realize this.
So, they failed.
As for the United States, although Americans belong to the Western camp, they have always had different humanitarian standards (implying religion) from Europe.
Americans’ sensitivity to climate issues, to equality, to social balance, does not exist in the same way as Europe does (implying that the gap between rich and poor in the US is much larger than in Europe).
There is a clear gap between American civilization and European civilization. Even though the United States and Europe are deeply aligned, our differences have always existed.
Trump’s coming to power just magnified the original differences.
I must stress that Europe is different from the United States.
Of course, the European civilization plan cannot be decided by Hungarian Catholics or Russian Orthodox Christians, but Europe’s long-term follow-up with the United States to expel Russia from the European continent is not necessarily correct.
The United States needs to confront Russia and Europe, but does Europe need it?
Europe cooperates with the United States to expel Russia, which may be the biggest geopolitical mistake of Europe in the 21st century.
The result of expelling Russia is that Putin has no choice but to embrace China, and this just gives China and Russia a chance to warm up.
Let one of our competitors combine with another to create a huge trouble, which is what the Americans do.
If Europe hadn’t expelled Russia, Russia’s policies would never have been so anti-Western. Now, in terms of geopolitics, it is impossible to give so much help to the great powers of the East.
But Europe’s problem is the military.
Because of the existence of NATO, it becomes very difficult for Europe to form another European army, and as long as the “European army” does not exist, Europe will be controlled by the political orders of the United States.
Sadly, when I talked about this with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, we were all pessimistic. In Europe, no one has the ability to form a European army, and no one has the ability to form a European army. Policy, give investment.
But the European military is the key point to check and balance the United States. Without the European military, Europe would have no real independence at all.
Yes, the United States is an ally, our long-term ally, but at the same time, he is also an ally who has been kidnapping us for a long time.
France is a powerful diplomatic power, a permanent member of the Security Council and the heart of the European Union.
Taking Russia out of Europe may be an absolutely far-reaching strategic mistake.
If France cannot pull Russia back into Europe, it will also be reluctant to continue its engagement, fueling tensions and isolating Russia.
At present, neither Russia nor that eastern power has any interest in forming an alliance, but no one is sure if the Western world is pressing harder and harder.
Will China and Russia still say with certainty that we will not form an alliance?
Is the enemy of our friend necessarily our enemy?
Russia is the enemy of the United States, so must he be the enemy of Europe?
We need to build Europe’s own new trust and security architecture, because if we don’t ease relations with Russia, there will be no peace on the continent.
Americans say a country that invests heavily in weapons and equipment, a declining demographic, an aging country.
Americans ask me, should we be afraid of this country? Should we reconcile with such a country?
I asked the Americans, how about swapping the positions of Russia and Canada?
In addition to economic turmoil and geopolitical turmoil, the third major turmoil we are now experiencing is undoubtedly the technological revolution turmoil.
Big data Internet, social media, artificial intelligence, when big intelligence spreads out in globalization, the progress of information technology is developing at an unprecedented speed.
One problem with the globalization of intelligence is the globalization of emotion, violence, and even hatred.
The technological revolution has brought us profound anthropological changes, and it has also created a new space for us, a space that requires human beings to re-examine and formulate rules.
This is a new technology rule space that the world has never touched, and it is also a rule of the Internet international order that everyone should agree with and participate in.
But before this new set of rules is fully established, the new technological revolution has brought us not only economic imbalances, but also anthropological class contradictions and ideological contradictions.
Ultimately, it will bring heavy tearing and instability to our proud democracy.
All the envoys here can see that economic turmoil, geopolitical turmoil, information technology turmoil, and democratic turmoil.
All these upheavals are happening at the same time, but what do we do?
What do we need to do now? Are we going to continue to be viewers, to be commentators, or to take on the responsibilities we have to take?
But one thing is for sure, if we all lose our political imagination and let the habits of the past decades or even centuries dictate our strategies, then we…
A president of a republic, a minister, a diplomat, a soldier, everyone in this room continues to do it the way it was in the past.
That is for sure, we’re going to “lose control.”
And after “out of control”, what awaits us is to disappear.
Civilization fades away, Europe fades away, and the moment of Western hegemony fades away with it.
Ultimately, the world will revolve around two poles: America and China, and Europe will have to choose between these two rulers.
Europe, will lose control completely, so I believe in only one thing so far, and that is bravery – the political strategy of daring to break through and take risks.
This kind of political strategy, which is different from the old Europe in the past, will lead to the failure of many things now, and there are also a large number of commentators in the country, and critics say that it will not succeed.
But what is fatal is not the comments and criticisms, but the loss of “brave heart” and “imaginative thinking”, and I think that only by trying some brave and imaginative politics can profoundly reflect the French national spirit, the best method.
Only France can re-establish a profound European civilization; only France can consider the issue of European survival from the perspective of European strategy and international politics.
The French spirit is a tenacious spirit of resistance and the pursuit of a different world. The spirit of resistance will never succumb to the inevitability and adaptability of affairs
This kind of implementation is carried out in the extraordinary spirit of the French people’s soul, and it has shaped the historical trend that only France can change the historical trend that Europe is gradually being swallowed by “two poles”.
Next, France will have several important agenda directions. The first is the “Eurasian Agenda”.
France will promote a better integration of China’s new Silk Road with the European Connectivity Strategy, but this integration must be done with respect for our sovereignty and rules.
Ten years ago, we made some mistakes in the integration of Europe and Asia. When Europe was dealing with the major financial crisis, in order to obtain assistance, it was forced to carry out privatization to reduce some of Europe’s sovereignty.
From Italy in the south to England in the north, but we don’t blame smart Chinese, we can only blame ourselves for being stupid.
In addition, in the face of the rise of China, France must also establish a “French strategy” with the United States in the Indo-Pacific region.
This is a “supplement” to France’s strategy of welcoming China’s Silk Road.
If we help our opponent in one place, then we have to check and balance it in other places. This is the usual way of politics.
France must establish “French influence” in the Indo-Pacific region to balance the rise of China’s power in the region. After all, France has millions of residents and nearly 10,000 soldiers in the region.
France wants to become one of the main maritime powers in the sea.
The second important agenda of France is to give priority to the establishment of European sovereignty.
I have talked to many people that European sovereignty is by no means an empty word, but we have already made the mistake of leaving the voice of sovereignty to the nationalists.
Nationalists by no means represent our sovereignty, which is a good word, and represents the core of our democracy. But if the government loses control over everything, there will be nothing left for sovereignty.
So nationalists have the right to have their voices heard, but they in no way represent European sovereignty.
For decades, Europe has built a strong and friendly market, but at the same time, we are also the most open and naive.
And when we discuss European sovereignty, we must also include the United Kingdom very deeply. Regardless of the final outcome of Brexit, European sovereignty includes the United Kingdom.
The other direction of European sovereignty is national defense. Regarding European defense, there has been no progress since the 1950s, and it is even forbidden to discuss.
But it’s time to build an initiative with more national defense sovereigns, relying on European funds and European armies.
I think this is the best time in decades to discuss “European defense sovereignty”, which requires all the envoys here to work harder.
Another focus of European sovereignty is Europe’s thinking about borders, which will also extend to the topic of population and immigration.
As Europe has experienced an unprecedented migration crisis since 2015, we must move away from the emergency management regime for refugees in order to create a sustainable talent landing mechanism.
More importantly, we should work with the International Organization for Migration to revive the immigration filtering work we did in Paris.
The last part is about economic and financial sovereignty.
We are now actively talking about Iran and continue to defend our claim to the Iranian agenda.
But the U.S. dollar has its “speciality”, even if we decide to protect Iran, our company will depend on the U.S. dollar to move forward.
Note, I’m not saying we have to fight the dollar, but we need to build a real “sovereignty of the euro”.
But this process is too slow, we are progressing too slowly!
And in the establishment of digital c, Europe also needs to reconsider, because digital currency will also affect future economic sovereignty.
Reconstructing European sovereignty, economic sovereignty, national defense sovereignty, and border sovereignty is the only way to truly strengthen European integration without interference from other countries outside.
Ladies and gentlemen, let us have a strong and coherent diplomacy, and at a time when Western hegemony is being challenged, we should use our respective political imaginations.
Take control of Europeans’ own destiny and return control to our people.
I count on you to play an important role in diplomacy, and I am grateful for these requests.
I will always be by your side to keep France at the heart of leading a range of important political issues.
Make our envoys have a strong representative power all over the world to defend our national interests, surpass our national interests, and let our values ??spread all over the world.
I thank you!
Long live the Republic, Long live France!
- Emmanuel Macron
