闭目养神

如果你不幸进来了,你会失望。如果在这里,你学到点什么,或有什么感受,那更是浪费你的时间了,咳,咳!
个人资料
金笔 (热门博主)
  • 博客访问:
归档
正文

耸人听闻吗?一项普林斯顿回顾性研究发现:美国已不再是个民主国家了!

(2015-10-27 09:39:27) 下一个

究竟谁在统治美国?普林斯顿学者 Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page 认为,在过去几十年中,美国的政治制度已经缓慢地从民主体制转换成寡头政治,富人拥有极大的权利。

Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page 是在整理总结1981年至2002年间,一千八百余项政策法案后,得出的结论,即富人,有社会关系者,在左右着美国政治,他们甚至可以背离广大选民的意志和愿望。

Asking "[w]ho really rules?" researchers Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page argue that over the past few decades America's political system has slowly transformed from a democracy into an oligarchy, where wealthy elites wield most power.

Using data drawn from over 1,800 different policy initiatives from 1981 to 2002, the two conclude that rich, well-connected individuals on the political scene now steer the direction of the country, regardless of or even against the will of the majority of voters.

TPM Interview: Scholar Behind Viral 'Oligarchy' Study Tells You What It Means

"The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy," they write, "while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence."

As one illustration, Gilens and Page compare the political preferences of Americans at the 50th income percentile to preferences of Americans at the 90th percentile as well as major lobbying or business groups. They find that the government—whether Republican or Democratic—more often follows the preferences of the latter group rather than the first.

The researches note that this is not a new development caused by, say, recent Supreme Court decisions allowing more money in politics, such as Citizens United or this month's ruling on McCutcheon v. FEC. As the data stretching back to the 1980s suggests, this has been a long term trend, and is therefore harder for most people to perceive, let alone reverse.

"Ordinary citizens," they write, "might often be observed to 'win' (that is, to get their preferred policy outcomes) even if they had no independent effect whatsoever on policy making, if elites (with whom they often agree) actually prevail."

[ 打印 ]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
评论
目前还没有任何评论
登录后才可评论.