Of course it's relevant. It reminds people like you that when you go to New York, DC or California, and talk about "build the wall" or "lock her up" in public, you'll most likely get into a fight. The chance of you winning that fight is much slimmer than what Trump's winning votes in the electoral college suggested.
Is it even relevant that Hillary won popular vote by 3 million? There are infinitely many voting methods. Popular vote happens NOT to be the constitutionally designated voting method of the US presidential election. The relevant information is Hillary lost in a land slide in the election college vote which IS the constitutionally designated voting method. There are millions of hypothetical vote counting methods Hillary would have lost.
Even if the popular voting method is the presidential election method, there is no evidence to suggest Hillary would have won. When the rule of the game changes, it does not take a genius to know the players need to change their strategies. The campaign methods of both candidates would have been completely different. So nobody could have predicted the alternative outcome.
lanlandehu2017-01-09 13:08:09回复悄悄话
好来坞的左棍们怎么不去谴责4个黑人对一个白人残疾人的种族仇恨?他们怎么不为自己的同胞被残害,被虐待被侮辱发声?怎么去上街游行呼吁 Al lives matter! Stop Hate crime? 他们真实地暴露了他们自己是典型的伪君子!他们只把自己用漂亮的外衣包装起来,他们内心的黑暗是看不见的!
ahhhh2017-01-09 12:57:15回复悄悄话
@ cyou, she also won 123% in Detroit. Big Win!
------------------------------------------------
1,http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
2,《The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life》(钟形曲线) in 1994 by Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray
3,http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
4,Lynn, Richard; Vanhanen, Tatu (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations(《智商与国民财富》). Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. ISBN 9780275975104.
5,J. Philippe Rushton(1995, 1997, 2000). Race, Evolution, and Behavior(《人种、进化、与行为》): A Life History Perspective.
Totally agree!
Of course it's relevant. It reminds people like you that when you go to New York, DC or California, and talk about "build the wall" or "lock her up" in public, you'll most likely get into a fight. The chance of you winning that fight is much slimmer than what Trump's winning votes in the electoral college suggested.
好莱坞歧视亚裔,她不放p, 残疾白人被四个黑人打,她不放p, 却选择川普模仿残疾人的手势来攻击川普,这种偏激偏见,利用残疾人达到攻击不同政见的人的行为极端丑陋,极端歧视,垃圾戏子
Is it even relevant that Hillary won popular vote by 3 million? There are infinitely many voting methods. Popular vote happens NOT to be the constitutionally designated voting method of the US presidential election. The relevant information is Hillary lost in a land slide in the election college vote which IS the constitutionally designated voting method. There are millions of hypothetical vote counting methods Hillary would have lost.
Even if the popular voting method is the presidential election method, there is no evidence to suggest Hillary would have won. When the rule of the game changes, it does not take a genius to know the players need to change their strategies. The campaign methods of both candidates would have been completely different. So nobody could have predicted the alternative outcome.
Geez, I thought this was common sense.
@justness: 不想和你争论什么,but here also is the fact: Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million. She also won 79% votes in New York City and 90% votes in DC.
人群----人口(亿)--福利(1)--智商(2)--2016年选举(3)
白人----1.980---1140.5---103-----58/37
黑人----0.463---2688.4----85------8/88
拉美----0.566---1439.2----89-----29/65
亚裔----0.170---1222.0---106-----29/65
说明:人口(亿)是2015年统计。福利统计单位是万人。
智商(Intelligence quotient)是人类的遗传属性,低智商与犯罪贫穷呈正相关。由于政治不正确,受O8政权强烈打压。该领域著名学者有Richard Lynn(理查德·林恩,1930-)(4),John Philippe Rushton(菲利普.拉什顿,1943-2012)(5)等。
2016选举,指该人群投共和党或民主党人数的百分比,如白人:58%投共和党,37%民主党,
2016选举最后统计还未公布。
------------------------------------------------
1,http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
2,《The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life》(钟形曲线) in 1994 by Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray
3,http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
4,Lynn, Richard; Vanhanen, Tatu (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations(《智商与国民财富》). Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. ISBN 9780275975104.
5,J. Philippe Rushton(1995, 1997, 2000). Race, Evolution, and Behavior(《人种、进化、与行为》): A Life History Perspective.
BTW, 伊斯特伍德还是老船的铁杆呢,那也是好莱坞传奇人物啊。:)当然,他没上过耶鲁,可是成为一个好演员和上名校毫无必然联系。
但是,艺术家不是政治家,更不代表大众的利益。听听就可以,不必非要上升到某种高度加以膜拜。:)哪个学校毕业的,也不能保证一辈子说的话都是对滴。
是非如何,让时间来检验。4年后,大家自然会做出自己更加准确的判断。
因为知名有影响力和话语权,为社会不公不义发声是国外演艺界传统,和国内戏子们从政当人大代表完全不同,他们只是多了一道保护伞或炫耀的舞台。例如成龙大哥除了天朝还能在哪里参政议政,好一句“人民是要管的”,立即成了帮凶恶犬,好恶心,还好他儿子先被管了。李小琳更是人大之妖了,也难怪,又不是人民选的,为什么要为人民服务呢,要求太高了。