insight

工程技术,地产投资,信仰家园,时尚生活
个人资料
正文

寻找幸福的真义

(2012-05-01 23:30:26) 下一个

数千年来,围绕赚取利润与信仰之间是否存在矛盾的辩论从未停止。收取利息符合道义吗?贷款是对穷人的剥削吗?说得更简单一点,你能在拥有财富的同时拥有一颗高尚的心灵吗,抑或是,为了保持高尚的心,你必须要过着苦行僧一般的生活吗?

今年的复活节为我们提供了一个再次思考这些令人纠结的问题的机会。利用这个机会,我们还可以想想,哪些东西对我们有着重要的意义,而哪些又是真正重要的。去年,在华尔街和伦敦圣保罗大教堂(St Paul's Cathedral)外,示威者发起了针对一些资本主义行为的抗议活动。在示威者看来,他们无法接受这些行为,尤其是银行的行为。如今,这场运动或许已渐渐平息,但核心问题依然未得到解决。

尽管有人更向往简朴的生活,但信仰与获利之间并不矛盾。赚钱谋生没有错:我们本就是要享受富足的生活的。之所以会产生矛盾,是因为我们将道德与经济进步割裂开来,并将后者与幸福划上了等号。

其实,资本主义本身并没有错。资本主义理论最打动人心的地方在于它提倡个体自由。但正如米尔顿•弗里德曼(Milton Friedman)曾经指出的,虽然我们有选择的自由,但我们不应随意剥夺他人的自由。

存在争议的,不是利率的高低,或是我们所住房子的大小。真正重要的是,我们要懂得应该如何对待彼此:也就是要遵循“黄金法则”。这一法则告诉我们,我们自己希望受到怎样的待遇,就应该用同样的方式去对待别人。因此,我们必需采取更有力的行动来减少资本主义带来的伤害,无论是企业不当行为造成的环境破坏,还是商品供应链上的工人们受到的不良待遇,尽管这种商品是我们全都渴望拥有的。股东的责任不仅在于赚取利润。获得利润的方式同样重要。

通过大量研究我们得知,最近几十年中,尽管西方的国内生产总值(GDP)一直在增长,但幸福感并没有增加。对于金钱,我们不应崇拜,也不能只考虑我们自己的利益——这会让我们有一种饥饿感,而它是无法通过占有更多的商品来填补的。

这是否意味着我们不应该享受所有尘世间的财富和商品?不。尽情享受吧。通过自己的努力去获得它们。要想拥有崇高的精神就只能过清苦的生活,或是认为辛勤劳作不应得到回报,这些都是错误的观念。重要的是,在贪婪和知足之间找到平衡,并且弄清楚,对我们而言,什么才是快乐的生活。

我们每个人都可能会有“钱是永远不够的”感觉,尤其是当我们见识了丰厚的银行业奖金时。可我们真正需要多少呢?使我们真正感到快乐的又是什么呢?于是,与人攀比以及经济学家索尔斯坦•维布伦(Thorstein Veblen)所称的炫耀性消费就成了势在必行之事。我们不应在意别人的看法,尽管真的做到并不容易。

那么,我们应该如何克服资本主义的缺陷呢?有人建议开征“罗宾汉税”(Robin Hood tax),也就是“托宾税”(Tobin tax)。但风险在于,这种税对投资者造成的打击也许要超过对银行的打击。而它将通过何种方式来抑制银行的高风险行为,也尚不明确。

我们无法通过征税来限制银行的危险行为,也不能指望它能解决问题,因为我们没能解决导致这类行为的根本原因。我们只是在治疗“病症”,而不是在治疗病人,我们在自欺欺人。

投资者应该采取的一项重要举措是,要求更多的投资产品对社会负起责任,同时向基金经理要求更高的回报。他们可以要求提高透明度,并对那些实际上对大众福利无益的高杠杆率产品提出反对。

对银行家来说,他们要抛弃戈登•盖科(Gordon Gekko)的思维模式,并放弃拿人钱财而不对之负责的想法,要做到这点很难,但却十分重要。当然,在理想的世界中,银行家会提出符合客户最佳利益和长期财务安全的建议,而不是为银行家和交易员赚取最高短期佣金的建议。银行及其股东可以通过推动激励机制改革来解决这一问题,而不仅仅是坐等政府监管机构引入新规。

对企业而言,它们能做的是增强自身的社会责任感,让承担社会责任不再只是一桩“善举”,而成为日常行为中不可或缺的一部分。我们每个人都可以开始行动,通过慈善,消除生活中的不平等。

因此,我们能够利用资本主义来谋生,不是去投机取巧谋取暴利,而是真诚地服务于他人,同时,在赚取利润的过程中,我们可以无损于他人。每一个人都能让这个世界更加美好,更加公平。的确,造物主所造的每个人都是善良的——是的,即便银行家也是如此。

本文作者德斯蒙德•图图(Desmond Tutu)为前南非开普敦大主教,贝蒂娜•格伦布鲁姆(Bettina Gronblom)为“不止为了营利”(Not Just for Profit)的首席执行官

Camels can pass through a needle's eye

For millennia there has been a debate about whether there is a conflict between making a profit and faith. Is it, for instance, moral to charge interest rates or is lending exploitation of the poor? To put it more simply, can you be wealthy and spiritual at the same time or do you have to lead a life of austerity to be spiritual?

The Easter weekend provides an opportunity to reflect again on these wrenching topics, on what is important to us and what really matters. Last year, demonstrators on Wall Street and outside St Paul’s Cathedral in London protested against what was seen as unacceptable capitalist behaviour, especially by the banks. This may have quietened down, but the core issues have not been solved.

While there is something to be said in favour of living simpler lives, there is no conflict between faith and turning a profit. It is fine to make a living; we are meant to enjoy abundant lives. The conflict comes when we separate ethics and economic progress and when we equate the latter with happiness.

To be clear, capitalism per se is not at fault. The most appealing thing about capitalist theory is the freedom for the individual. But as Milton Friedman wrote, while we are free to choose, we should not be free to deprive others of their freedom.

At issue is not the rate of interest or the size of the mansion we inhabit. What matters is that we understand how we should behave to one another: namely, following the Golden Rule, that we should treat others as we would have others treat us. So we have to do better at stemming the abuses of capitalism, whether environmental decline from corporate malpractice or the abuse of workers in supply chains for goods that we all love to own. Shareholder responsibility is not only to make profits. How they are made also matters.

We now know, through various studies, that while gross domestic product has increased in the west in recent decades, happiness has not. We cannot worship money and our self-interest alone – it leaves us with a hunger that can never be satisfied by acquiring more goods.

Does this mean we should not enjoy all the earthly riches and goods? No. Enjoy them. Earn them. It is a misconception that one has to be poor to be spiritual, and that hard work should not be rewarded. What is important is finding the balance between greed and having enough, and defining what a joyful life means to us.

We all have the potential to feel that “more money is never enough”, particularly when we see vast banking bonuses. But how much do we really need, and what really makes us happy? Then there are the imperatives of “keeping up with the Joneses” and what the economist Thorstein Veblen called conspicuous consumption. Hard as it can be, we should not worry about what others think.

So how are we to correct the negative traits of capitalism? A Robin Hood tax, or Tobin tax, has been suggested. Yet there is a risk that such a tax is more likely to hit investors than banks. And it is not yet clear how it would discourage risky behaviour by banks.

We cannot tax ourselves out of this and hope that this will solve the problem because we are not addressing the root cause of the behaviour. We are in self-denial because we are treating the symptoms, not healing the patient.

One important step would be for investors to start to demand a wider range of socially responsible investment products and challenge fund managers to seek better returns. They can demand transparency and be opposed to highly leveraged products that do not actually produce anything useful for the common good.

Harder to effect, but important, is for bankers to move away from the mindset of Gordon Gekko, and the idea of taking someone else’s money and not being responsible for it. In an ideal world, of course, they would offer advice that serves clients’ best interests and long-term financial security, rather than that which earns bankers and traders the highest short-term commissions. Banks and their shareholders can help address this by pushing to reform the incentive structure rather than wait for state regulators to bring in new rules.

Companies can improve corporate social responsibility, so it is no longer just a “nice thing to do” but rather an integral part of daily practice. We can all start to even out inequality through philanthropy.

So we can earn a living through capitalism, not by profiteering but by genuinely servicing others and in the process of producing a profit we can do no harm. Everyone can help to make the world a better and fairer place. Indeed, every human is made for goodness – yes, even bankers.

The writers are the former archbishop of Cape Town and the chief executive of Not Just for Profit

[ 打印 ]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
评论
目前还没有任何评论
登录后才可评论.