正文

鉛中毒的回帖

(2010-04-12 16:30:35) 下一个
在討論這個問題之前,您應該先讀一下下面這兩篇文章
http://www.activehomes.net/information_center/article_archive/lead_based_paint.dwt
and
http://www.harveykruse.com/lead.htm

最後回答您的問題之前,您需要讀一下這篇文章

http://www.peircelaw.com/cases.htm


所以老貓的結論是,單憑您所提供的資料,老貓實在很難提供任何實際的建議,但是基本上如果您或您的律師能夠證明房主有失職的地方,如果您能夠做到下面四點的要求您應該可以有一個case,

The Hall court held that plaintiffs could maintain a cause of action against the industry if:

1) the defendants breached a duty of care owed to the plaintiffs,

2) the plaintiffs proved a causal link between the group- created harm and the injuries,

3) the plaintiffs proved beyond a preponderance of the evidence that it was the caps of at least one of the defendants that caused the injuries, and,

4) that the breaches of duty were similar in nature and similar in time.



所以老貓希望您應該真正找一個律師仔細研究一下這個問題。
[ 打印 ]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
评论
目前还没有任何评论
登录后才可评论.