偶灯斯陋

random thoughts by 偶灯斯陋
个人资料
偶灯斯陋 (热门博主)
  • 博客访问:
正文

为什么有这么些人如此缺乏是非观念,拼命为凶手找借口开脱,拼命为已经倒下来的被害人找“罪行”?这种现象值得深究。

(2009-01-27 22:37:20) 下一个

为'不明则问'网友叫好!回复:提上来问飞翔的鱼:

真个是不平则鸣


那谁谁,全凭道听途说来抹黑受害者,朝倒在血泊中的受害人再踹上两脚,真是卑鄙小人。估摸着对方没有还手能力是吧??
真是coward!


奇怪,为什么把不明则问(bu ming ze wen) 的帖子给删掉了?正读着“不明则问” 在反驳“飞翔的鱼”,怎么一下子全不见了?



这个N. A. 坛子如此删除异见帖子,显然带有倾向性,不是公平公正的做法。

为什么有这么些人如此缺乏是非观念,拼命为凶手找借口开脱,拼命为已经倒下来的被害人找“罪行”?这是什么心态? 这种现象值得深究。

[而“罪行”总可以找到, 所谓“欲加之罪,何患无辞”!只要你大嘴一掀,啪啦啪啦啪啦就出来了。至于证据吗?证据是莫须有的。“只要我怀疑你有罪,你就有罪”。]

[----回复:朱海洋和杨忻事件的最新资料ZT ---又是一篇无耻的以讹传讹捕风捉影的文字。软刀子杀人不见血---反正血已经流完了。看来这诽谤事业还在方兴未艾。

“除非你拿得出经得起推敲的人证物证,你的话语经得起测谎器的检验,否则你说的这些都是无中生有,诽谤他人。而遭受你的无耻诽谤的是失去生命失去语言的被害者。你明明知道死者无法自卫,才用这种语言暴力来攻击她,你这真是恃强凌弱!”
 ]

I need brainstorm why we have such a phenomenon of quite a sizable number of people who are so eager to and shamelessly defend the murderer (i.e., Zhu Haiyang) but defame and blame the victim (i.e., Yang Xin).

Reason1: They have NO moral standard. "Thou shall not kill" does not apply to them. Killing others is OK with them, as long as the victim is not themselves.

Reason2: They follow Misogynic Tradition. As the victim is a woman, so it must be her fault. Therefore, they dig and spread groundless fabrications and rumors and convince themselves to believe that the victim herself caused all this crime.

Reason3: They somehow identify with the murderer.

Reason4: They just know NO respect for human life.

Reason5: They just plain lack the capacity for either empathy or sympathy and know nothing about human decency.

Reason6: Since the victim is fallen and could not defend herself, they could just do whatever to hurt her and still get away!

Reason7: Try to dig out the truth behind the insanity (网友贡献),as the Zhu supporters find themselves 同病相怜 with the murderer.

Reason8: Cyber-bullying. Behind the cyber mask, defamation of the victim is free of charge, free of consequences.

Reason9: In order to achieve high clicking rate on their blogs, they defame and destroy the victim with any imaginable rumors. They claim shamelessly to be the "character assassins", saying defense lawyers are doing this kind of character assassination all the time, why can't they do it? (Again, know no moral standards, know no decency.)

Reason10: (---anything else?)

[ 打印 ]
阅读 ()评论 (4)
评论
偶灯斯陋 回复 悄悄话 回复不明则问的评论: OK.I'll be there. Thanks!
不明则问 回复 悄悄话 回复偶灯斯陋的评论:

爱是有缘
偶灯斯陋 回复 悄悄话 “。。。很。。。悲哀。但真是不知能做些什么。”--我想,把自己的想法表达出来,即令是再小再微弱的声音,聚沙成塔集腋成裘,总会有些作用吧。

爱坛在哪?找到方向后一定登门拜访。
不明则问 回复 悄悄话 很高兴能得到你的支持。对于那些对受害者进行无耻诽谤和攻击的人,除了反驳之外,我也很替他们悲哀,很替中国的教育悲哀。但真是不知能做些什么。

有空到爱坛来玩玩,那边的版主最近相当nice,我的好些比较。。。的发言都没被删掉。
登录后才可评论.