yinyangguaiqi2008-07-03 16:30:15回复悄悄话
The United States is the most successful country in terms of brain-wash through political propaganda. This is one of my expriences that involved the so called freedeom of speech.
I watched a program called “Frontline” on PBS channel. It basically exaggerated the situation in Darfur as a “genocide” (but it never showed the concrete evidence in terms of the number of people who were killed). It described how some of the so called “activists” conspired a “Genocide Olympics” with Dalai to force Chinese by humiliating Chinese to join an UN resolution to pressure Sudan government. They were very proud of what they had done and considered the conspiracy a “success”. I wrote a letter and posted to the PBS web site specifically to respond this program right after the show. But what I could see was the letters from other people except for mine. While I was trying to figure out why, I saw a quote saying that they can not publish all of the letters because of the large quantity. Then it says that “we will post the letters after reviewing them and will publish it according to the content the letters cover”. I then read the published ones and found out that almost all of the published letters were one side opinion, which is, UN is useless and China is veil.
美国的学校教室里,没有“热爱。。。”的标语口号,学生也不上政治课。民众爱国的确是自发的。也许,他们会天天指责政府无能,官员无德。但是,他们不会像网上的轮子们一样咒骂自己的国家。 至于说 Freedom of speech, 您发表这篇评论不就是最好的注解吗?
2] "...美国人讲爱国主义就是普世价值,中国人讲爱国主义就是狭隘民族主义...我也想到美国去做一个热爱普世价值的国际主义者..."(from 大陆百姓)
Correction: 美国人讲爱国主义是一个狭隘民族主义;中国人爱讲热爱普世价值的国际主义!!!
回复加州花坊:说的精辟“比如一个人看到大堤上漏水了,是站在那儿大骂什么人建的堤,都有谁与此事有关?还是赶快想办法把洞补上哪?我想如果大家都做补洞的人,无论哪个国家都会被建设好。”
回复北奥兄:你老板还喜欢听什么,我写给他听,让他高兴,然后天天放您老兄大假,照开薪水,呵呵。节日快乐!
一并谢后来各位的理性评论,恕不一一回复,谢谢!
“天赋人权,不可侵犯,人类生来自由平等,每个人都具有一些与生俱来的,不可剥夺的基本人权,那就是生命的权力,思想的权力,自由的权力,与追求幸福的权力。政府的组成是为了维护和发扬人的基本人权。 政府由人民选举产生,人民有权监督政府, 政府如果破坏人民的基本人权,人民有权推翻政府,必要时可以使用武力。为了在自己出生的土地上推翻暴政的统治,我们---人民,光荣的具有永远不可剥夺的反抗和革命的权力。”
憨哥的文章图文并茂, 蓝天, 蓝底, 蓝边, 蓝旗,让人的心情特别地舒畅.
其实我们在美国已经把自由和民主习惯成空气一样的东西, 不知不觉了.
中午吃饭的时候, 我把憨哥的文章让我的老板看, 我说我们都喜爱美国,
结果他一高兴, 当即宣布: 下班回家!! 哈哈~~~~
Do you work for US goverment to post comments?
我总是不明白一些人老是以自己的某种心态猜测别人。或许你只是疑惑时间问题,您问搂主怎么有时间写帖子不就得了,非要联想那么多干吗?我说的很清楚,这是昨天晚上的读书笔记。早前我也解释过N次了,我从小到现在有写日记的毛病,如今有博客,有时就贴上来了,仅此而已。如果说时间,我上网不打游戏不聊天,闲暇发个帖子,怎么都要和什么政府联系在一起?莫名其妙。您在这里看贴和回帖,哪里来的时间?在这里每个人都有其观点,难道一定都是美国政府和中国政府所雇用?谢谢。顺便说一句,英文我比较差,还需要好好学习。
一并谢谢后来的理性评论,谢谢大家,祝各位晚安!
180度大转弯,不给开钱了?
I watched a program called “Frontline” on PBS channel. It basically exaggerated the situation in Darfur as a “genocide” (but it never showed the concrete evidence in terms of the number of people who were killed). It described how some of the so called “activists” conspired a “Genocide Olympics” with Dalai to force Chinese by humiliating Chinese to join an UN resolution to pressure Sudan government. They were very proud of what they had done and considered the conspiracy a “success”. I wrote a letter and posted to the PBS web site specifically to respond this program right after the show. But what I could see was the letters from other people except for mine. While I was trying to figure out why, I saw a quote saying that they can not publish all of the letters because of the large quantity. Then it says that “we will post the letters after reviewing them and will publish it according to the content the letters cover”. I then read the published ones and found out that almost all of the published letters were one side opinion, which is, UN is useless and China is veil.
但这篇文章要大顶!
主要是说明了一点:(楼下骂美国的大弱们注意看了)
政府可能会经常地去蒙蔽和欺骗,但政府有时还是代表人民。
人民可能会被一时的蒙蔽和欺骗,但人民永远不会代表政府。
何谓流氓?从早期辞典的释义来看,对流氓所下的定义大致如下:一是指居所不定之流浪者,二是指所谓的莠民,如《中文大辞典》解释为:今谓扰乱社会秩序安宁、专事不良行为者,亦曰流氓,痞子。当今的《现代汉语词典》解释为:(1)原指无业游民,后来指不务正业、为非作歹的人。(2)指放刁、撒赖、施展下流手段等恶劣行为的人。
由此延伸,网络上的流氓网痞,一般是指在网络上居无定所,马甲无数,不务正业(比如从不静心看贴、理性回复等),到处造谣生事,散布流言蜚语;到别人家里滋事生非,用下流手段到处侮辱谩骂他人等,皆可以归属于网络流氓和网络痞子的范畴。
一并回复所有理性评论,谢谢大家,祝节日快乐!
别人爱什么原因都由你决定的。
”
--------------------------------------
既然推崇美国人的言论自由,为什么到了范跑跑这就上纲上线了?还动不动拿他的老婆被强奸做假设。看看写的这些东西就知道是个流氓网痞。
和平等,不是什么党派和领袖。他们知道任何国家都有爱国主义,那只不过是一个
非常自然的情感,而不是什么真正的“主义”。
和平等,不是什么党派和领袖。他们知道任何国家都有爱国主义,那只不过是一个
非常自然的情感,而不是什么真正的“主义”。