最新文章
文章分类
归档
2007 (223)
2008 (139)
2009 (90)
2017 (1)
2018 (3)
正文
1。在布什父子俩的领导下，共和党早几经脱离了里根奠定的保守主义。 党内温和派把持席位，一个以保卫美国和美国人民自由为宗旨的大党，变成了一个同民主党没什么区别的政党。以麦肯和格兰为代表共和党温和派，在人民需要他们强硬的时候，没有任何勇气揭穿以奥巴马为代表的激进左派的真面目，迎头痛击，却让他们步步紧逼，任意践踏宪法，强奸民意，造成美国走向社会主义道路的今天，共和党内必须反省，清理队伍，维护和捍卫美国的宪法，保护人民的自由和国家的强大。
2。这次奥巴马医改投票，全体共和党团结一致，没有漏一票，说明共和党议员们认识到了他们的责任和义务，这是个进步。其实民主党根本就没打算同共和党合作，奥巴马同共和党的会谈全是作秀。众议院里共和党80个修正案全部被否决，参议院里共和党29个修正案全部被枪毙，说明了左派民主党立场之坚定，旗帜之鲜明，就是要大张旗鼓在美国搞社会主义，爱咋咋地。共和党如果还有谁想认真地要同民主党商量商量共同治国安民的方针政策，那就太天真，太幼稚了。
3。这次投票，有30个民主党同共和党站在一起，本身就说明奥巴马医疗改革不是一个好的提案。共和党最后把宝押到10多位反坠胎的民主党身上，这也是不得已的。但最后，民主党还是民主党，在奥巴马背后交易下，出卖美国人民的利益。最后以7票通过。说明什么？ 说明老毛说的对：民主党根本就没原则！
4。50%以上的美国人反对奥巴马的医改，但所有媒体都为奥巴马造势，包括FOX NEWS在最后阶段也是不断说提案会通过。这并不说明美国人民向往社会主义，媒体怎么给奥巴马摇旗呐喊，说也不能说明民主党违背美国宪法的提案是得民心的。因此，共和党要同茶党运动配合起来，在11月份中选中重振河山，高举里根保守主义大旗，为保护美国人民的自由，维护美国宪法，全线出击。
| |||
|
大美帝国要讲钱，
其次正义与人权。
没钱难谈全保险，
全民保险不花钱。
再多再全也心愿。
全民保险花大钱，
心中有苦真难言。
辛勤苦苦打工钱，
还为他人负保险。
非法移民加懒汉，
不劳而获享清闲。
全民保险瞎胡干，
良民终将成懒汉。
你不干活我等饭，
最后你我丢饭碗。
思前想后心不甘，
誓保美帝万万年。
美国人民不一般，
要与共产对照干。
杀富济贫是野蛮，
更是远离美利坚。
如今全保过众院，
我们应该怎么办。
下届奥把不能选，
还有他的同伙伴。
全民保险要法办，
更送奥伙阎王店。
this is the most ridiculous comments I've heard. By the way, I want to live whereever i feel comfortable... and fortunately I don't live in USA...
Health care in the U.S. is about 16% of its GDP. In 2007, about $2.26 trillion was spent on health care, and health care costs are rising faster than wages or inflation... In fact, government health care spending in USA is consistently greater than in Canada, Italy, the United Kingdom and Japan, the universal health care provide to public. But still 32million people cannot afford health insurence in USA.
知道什么叫保守派/右派，什么叫自由派/左派吗？自己先搞清楚再给别人扣帽子。
In unites states, we have the best health care of the world. If they system is so terrible, why don't you go back to china or other third world country? I only know people from all over the world come here for the health care, not vice versa.
Don't tell me you are can't afford your health insurance. That just mean you are damn too lazy to work, too stupid to improve yourself or too cheap to purchase the insurance. Beside,in united states, you can get access to the health care, even if you are illegal and never pay tax. All you have to do is to go to ER room. Why isn't Obama address this issue?
美国60%的破产是因为无力支付医疗费用，无论你是大学教授还是普通工人；美国的医疗费用支出占GDP16%，$2.26 trillion，但还是有3000多万人没有保险 - 从这个角度上说，还真不是你努力工作养家糊口就可以了。。。别怪我问你，LZ你能生得起一场大病吗？在美国和在第三世界国家差不多。
at the end of the day, we all need to take care of ourselves.
红卫兵能文能武，誓死捍卫领袖，谁反对他谁就得被打倒。可惜，到头来，不过是被利用的棋子罢了。 在美国，还是多自己挣些钱养家糊口吧。
haha, 你可真是太有才了！笃信宗教的人可以不用担心生老病死，反正死后正好上天堂。
“说明老毛说的对：民主党根本就没原则！” - LZ,你这话很不靠谱呀！
再者，奥巴马用了13个月希望能够和共和党沟通 - 不然看看参众两院，他早就通过医改方案了 - 是共和党人在用共产主义、社会主义词汇吓唬百姓 - 他们还真是没有见识过什么是真正的社会主义。
坚决要求撤销一切公共福利，同时撤销所有税收！ 病了？ 强者可以挺得过，弱者正好淘汰。 老不死的早点死，也是为人类作贡献。
大家都信神了，有病祷告便好，要那些庸医们作甚！
的确，奥巴马给共和党上了一课，只用随意的共产主义和社会主义来攻击别人是没有用的，看不见医疗制度的问题，一个政党还不如普通老百姓 - 也是共和党的失利 - 共和党没有什么资格代表人民 - 人民在2008年已经用选票说明不用他们来做决定了，不是吗？
沉默的大多数最后取得了胜利。前路依然漫长，但毕竟走出了第一步，美国快破产的医疗体系终于有了改革的希望。
7 Sickening Questions About Obamacare
What government program has ever reduced the deficit? Why are some in the White House and Congress exempt from this plan? And those questions are just for starters...
A new CBS News poll finds that “nearly two in three Americans want Republicans in Congress to continue to challenge parts of the health care reform bill.” At this point, there will only be minor technical changes in the bill even with the new House vote required for final passage. But the battle over public opinion goes on. Here are seven sickening questions about Obamacare that all Americans must consider:
1. What big government entitlement program has ever:
• Reduced the deficit?
• Only cost what it says it will and lowered the costs of goods and services?
• Improved quality?
• Enhanced efficiency?
• Decreased delays?
• Fostered more choice and competition?
• Featured competent bureaucracy?
• Operated with honest accounting?
• Avoided fraud, abuse, waste, maddening red tape, and higher taxes?
Why should we trust that Obamacare will do all that? Obamacare’s deceptive budget cooking was described in one instance by Senate Budget Committee chairman Kent Conrad (D-ND) as "a Ponzi scheme of the first order, the kind of thing that Bernie Madoff would have been proud of."
2. Why does Obamacare exempt some in Congress and the White House from having to buy the same health care plans that the law forces other Americans to purchase: President Obama, Vice President Biden, Cabinet members, top White House staff, congressional committee staff and leadership staff, such as those who work for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)?
Republican Senators Chuck Grassley (Iowa) and Tom Coburn (Oklahoma) tried to close this loophole, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) wouldn’t even let it come up for a vote. As Grassley says, “It’s only fair and logical that top administration officials, who fought so hard for passage of this overhaul of America’s health care system, experience it themselves. If it’s as good as promised, they’ll know it first-hand. If there are problems, they’ll be able to really understand them, as they should.”
3. How will we deal with a doctor shortage caused by Obamacare, particularly when doctors are being asked to treat 32 million more Americans now insured by the new law?
The Medicus Firm a medical recruitment company, found in a survey that 46 percent of physicians said they’d quit or retire if Obamacare became law. According to the survey, "even if a much smaller percentage such as ten, 15, or 20 percent are pushed out of practice over several years at a time when the field needs to expand by over 20 percent, this would be severely detrimental to the quality of the health care system."
4. How will patients—particularly senior citizens—feel when their doctors and even hospitals tell them, “Sorry, but we’re only taking on non-Medicare patients who pay privately, in full”?
The New York Times (which championed Obamacare) wrote last year that “Some doctors—often internists but also gastroenterologists, gynecologists, psychiatrists and other specialists—are no longer accepting Medicare, either because they have opted out of the insurance system or they are not accepting new patients with Medicare coverage. The doctors’ reasons: reimbursement rates are too low and paperwork too much of a hassle.” Under ObamaCare, physicians’ Medicare fees are supposed to be cut 21 percent and hospital reimbursements for Medicare patients chopped by $1.3-billion. How long can doctors and hospitals sustain those losses before they’re forced to pull the plug on treating Medicare patients (although some exceptions may be made in dire emergencies)? Count on Congress to use budget tricks like temporary “fixes” to defer those cuts until at least after the November elections.
5. How can President Obama claim that insurance premiums will go down when the very same nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office he quotes, selectively, has said that Obamacare will cause the average family’s premiums to go up by as much as 13 percent by 2016?
6. Remember the “jobs saved or created” canard regarding Obama’s economic stimulus?
The president is repeating that fantasy by applying it to Obamacare. However, the nonpartisan Lewin Group estimates that as many as 600,000 people will lose their jobs due to the onerous new employer health care mandates in Obamacare.
7. Do you realize that Obamacare turns Medicare into what should really be called "Medi-pare"?
Obamacare slices $528-billion from Medicare, including $136-billion carved out of Medicare Advantage. As The Washington Examiner’s Susan Ferrechio has reported, “The Medicare Advantage cuts will force 4.8 million seniors off the popular plan by 2019. An additional $23 billion in cuts to Medicare will come from a panel charged with slashing Medicare spending.”
Those are just some of the gut-wrenching questions about Obamacare that cry out for answers. But as the expression goes, “It’s what you don’t know that really hurts you.” Obamacare is so full of dubious assumptions that in future years we may rename it Obama’s box, as in Pandora’s box.
还真有你这么天真的人，居然还振振有词。 看副总统拜登是怎么看奥巴马医改的：
"Although President Obama repeatedly said he had no idea how health care politics would play out, Vice President Joe Biden told a fundraising audience Wednesday the White House would have been doomed without it.
"If we were unable to move the ball on this issue, not only in the political sense might we be dead," Biden said, according to the pool report filed on the event. "But in terms of being able to deal with other major issues on our plate, we would've been done. Absolutely done."
生病和不生病，只是一种状态，不是什么权利，生了病要求医治，那叫需求，不叫权利。医生愿不愿给你看，那个反而是医生的自由和医生的权利，上天赋予的，人一出生就拥有的自由，那个才叫天赋权利。
生了病，你没有权利要求别人为你的病负责，你的死期到了，别人也不需要为你的死亡负责，除非，别人是加害者。
打着权利的口号，打着某某人生病痛苦的口号，就要强迫别人负责，强迫加税，那么，这个就叫犯罪，因为税是不是凭空产生，而是劳动者纳税人用他们的生命时间精力血汗换来，这是对这些劳动者纳税人的公然的谋杀和抢劫。
这些民主党都应该进劳改营和监狱，这不正是它们梦寐以求的社会主义共产主义天堂么。
而更应该警惕的是，这些社会主义信徒民主党人其实真正要干的，乃是要通过这个全民健保这个无底洞来拖垮美国，分裂人群，制造阶级矛盾，最终的目的，就是要把自由的美国委内瑞拉化。
尽可能的“改变”！！！美国，不就是奥巴马和他的同志们正在努力的么：）
===========
左派喜欢夸口的一句话，就是所谓的“爱一切的人”。
其实，爱恶人就是对善人的仇恨，对毒蛇宽容，就是对阿当的子孙残忍。
左派在它们的“爱一切人”的虚假谎言里，结果做出的罪恶，比那些不爱人的人，还要多的多。
以爱的口号行恶，就是这些左派民主党社会主义信徒的一个最为典型的特征。
============
2010年的三月21号，左派的民主党不管大部分美国人的反对，在共和党人一致投反对票的情况下，强行通过了医改法案，这是对美国人的强暴，也是强迫美国人走上社会主义化委内瑞拉化的道路。
是时候，美国人起来，把这些多年渗透控制了美国国会和政府的左派社会主义民主党驱逐出去，因为邪恶和美好，原本就不能共存。
救自己也救这个美好的乐土，把邪恶的社会主义信徒清除吧。不要等到美国已经委内瑞拉化，纳粹化，那时，就已经太晚。
神保佑美国的前提，乃是美国人不离弃神，当美国人自愿非自愿的相信政府，迷信这个人造的恶，那么，神离弃美国也就是必然的了。
不要被恶人挟持往死路上走，当知道，这是转折关头，生死时刻。
一种伟大的民主政治不应该是放弃这样的群体的制度。