【我与AI】报告班长，AI被我逼得抛弃逻辑了。兼论语言类AI的平庸化

我：A bill has been filed in the Texas legislature that would ban citizens, governments and entities of China, Iran, North Korea and Russia from purchasing land in Texas Republican state Sen. Lois Kolkhorst filed SB 147 to ban certain foreign governments and entities associated with them from purchasing real property in Texas.

chatgpt：

Based on the information provided, it would seem that this bill aims to restrict the purchase of real property in Texas by citizens, governments, and entities of China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia. This type of restriction is not necessarily discriminatory, as it is not based on characteristics such as race, religion, nationality, gender, or age.
However, it is important to consider whether such a restriction is constitutional and in line with established legal precedent in the United States. The U.S. Constitution protects the right of citizens and corporations to freely buy and sell property, unless such restrictions are reasonable and in accordance with the Constitution.
If the bill is determined to be unconstitutional, it may be struck down by the courts. However, it would require a legal challenge and a court ruling to determine whether this bill is in line with the Constitution and does not infringe upon established constitutional rights.

“根据所提供的信息，该法案似乎旨在限制中国、伊朗、朝鲜和俄罗斯的公民、政府和实体在德克萨斯州购买不动产。 这种类型的限制不一定是歧视性的，因为它不是基于种族、宗教、国籍、性别或年龄等特征。 然而，重要的是要考虑这种限制是否符合宪法并符合美国既定的法律先例。 美国宪法保护公民和公司自由买卖财产的权利，除非此类限制合理且符合宪法。 如果该法案被确定为违宪，它可能会被法院否决。 但是，需要通过法律挑战和法院裁决来确定该法案是否符合宪法并且没有侵犯既定的宪法权利。”

可以清楚地看到，AI的评论佛州土地限购法令时，明确而恬不知耻地暴露了AI背后的人的 doctrine。

看答案的第一段，前后两句在人类语言逻辑上时赤果果的矛盾的阐述。