冯德莱恩辞职 引起轩然大波

布鲁塞尔主席令人震惊的辞职：欧盟权力中心陷入危机

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1_ES_tpM_E

2025年9月13日 乌尔苏拉·冯德莱恩的惊人辞职在欧洲引起轩然大波。随着欧盟委员会主席的卸任，欧盟面临着前所未有的政治动荡、街头抗议以及成员国之间日益加深的分歧。

冯德莱恩卸任背后的政治压力和阴谋, 能源、移民和欧盟主权基金的冲突, 德、法、意、匈四国之间日益加剧的紧张关系。这一历史性时刻的经济和全球后果？欧洲正处于改革还是解体的边缘？观看视频，了解这场撼动欧盟核心的危机。

乌尔苏拉·冯德莱恩的时代正处于十字路口。欧盟委员会主席，欧洲最具权势的女性之一， 正在准备辞职，但没有人能够确切地说出究竟是哪些力量将她推向了这一步。是政治压力，还是她内部的阴谋，又或者仅仅是欧洲大陆分裂的负担？有一件事是肯定的：欧洲正处于动荡之中。谣言、权力游戏和不确定性笼罩着布鲁塞尔权力机构的每个角落。

据《政治报》报道，欧盟总部内部已进入紧急状态。邦德利昂的意外离职使欧盟陷入了严重的体制危机。在外交政策、能源供应、预算问题和战略联盟等方面的不同观点正在浮出水面。欧洲理事会内部出现分歧，成员国正在努力重新界定政治路线。

据《Lefiguro》报道，各国元首和政府首脑们既恼怒又困惑。辞职原因至今仍不明朗。在权力的走廊里，一些泄露出来的消息比任何官方声明都更有说服力。据说，在乔治亚·马洛尼和维克托·奥尔班率领的意大利和匈牙利代表团示威性退场后，乌尔苏拉·范德莱昂在一次激烈的会议上失声痛哭。官方永远不会证实这一消息，但在政治上，感知就是现实。

这一谣言像野火一样蔓延，象征着欧盟不仅分裂，而且濒临政治崩溃。布鲁塞尔的局势早已震动。

2025年8月22日，欧盟委员会不得不否认范德莱昂被排除在与唐纳德·特朗普和其他国家元首的会晤之外的谣言。她的发言人否认了这一说法，但不信任感早已埋下。在这种紧张的气氛下，围绕新的预算规则和计划中的欧盟主权基金展开了戏剧性的一幕。乍一看，这是一个雄心勃勃的计划，共同举债资助绿色项目和国防工业。但对意大利和匈牙利来说，这项基金却是一种挑衅。罗马必须处理15万份额外的庇护申请，而布达佩斯则被要求要么接收5万名移民，要么支付数十亿美元的罚款。

一项能源团结机制迫使匈牙利以限定价格向欧洲电网供应天然气。这是对奥尔班能源政策的直接攻击。对马洛尼和奥尔班来说，这不仅仅是谈判策略，而是对中央集权议程的根本性拒绝。他们的示威性罢工是与布鲁塞尔冲突的高潮。班东德里翁的情绪反应，无论是沮丧的泪水还是崩溃的迹象，都象征着联邦主义梦想与严酷的国家利益现实碰撞的危机。

这标志着欧盟委员会主席不得不意识到，她不再是领导者，而是亲眼目睹其权威的崩溃。
与此同时，街头抗议活动爆发。就在布鲁塞尔辩论仍在继续之际，德国、法国和波兰的农民封锁了高速公路。他们抗议欧盟委员会推动的绿色协议要求、氮排放限制、耕地义务以及乌克兰免税粮食措施。因此，罗马和布达佩斯政府的反抗，是一场更广泛的民众运动的一部分，这场运动已经在巴伐利亚的田野和西欧的港口显现出来。法德轴心也出现了裂痕。

8月28日，在巴黎举行的一次会议揭示了柏林与巴黎之间日益加深的隔阂。
德国因经济衰退和工业生产停滞而变得虚弱，无力承担领导角色。

总理弗里德里希·梅里茨谈到了妥协的必要性，但柏林软弱无力，无法稳定分裂的欧洲。
在法国，危机进一步加深。总理弗朗索瓦·贝鲁宣布对法国进行不信任投票，原因是布鲁塞尔强制推行了一项440亿欧元的紧缩计划，旨在将法国的预算赤字控制在欧盟3%的门槛以下。

马赛街头爆发的抗议活动，反对主要打击底层民众的紧缩措施，使紧张局势更加凸显。马卡龙总统为削减开支辩护，但同时又将军事预算提高了65亿欧元。这传递了一个矛盾的信息。

八月最后一周发生的事件, 描绘了一幅欧洲大陆政治的图景不稳定。不信任投票、街头抗议以及来自各国首都的相互矛盾的声明，都表明联盟比以往任何时候都更加分裂。范德里翁的权威，因为从一开始就站不住脚，而最终土崩瓦解。2019年，她并非由民选直接上任，而是默克尔和马克龙之间妥协的结果。由于没有直接授权，她的权力依赖于国家元首和政府首脑的善意，而这些人，恰恰是现在正在抛弃她的人。

此外，还有她过去的丑闻和风波。她担任德国国防部长期间，曾爆出顾问丑闻，数百万美元被花在外部顾问身上，而联邦的坦克、舰船和飞机却状况糟糕。这种管理不善的名声一直伴随着她，一直延续到布鲁塞尔。

然后是“费兹门”丑闻。 350亿欧元疫苗协议谈判中被禁止发送短信，加剧了人们对范德利昂凌驾于规则之上的怀疑。欧洲检察官正在进行的调查强化了这种印象。与此同时，成员国的政策加剧了紧张局势。乔治奥·马洛尼表示要停止与布鲁塞尔的对抗，而佩德罗·桑切斯则呼吁团结，这是对意大利单打独斗路线的微妙批评。在中欧和东欧，许多国家暗中认为，曾经对他们进行法治教育的欧盟委员会现在正面临反叛。

8月26日的民意调查显示，人们对欧盟机构的信任度显著下降，尤其是在南欧和中欧。但为什么范德利昂偏偏在此时辞职呢？

据《明镜周刊》报道，机密文件显示，网络安全和能源资源方面的战略合同是在没有成员国监督的情况下闭门谈判的。分析人士将此解读为前所未有的透明度危机的信号。更具爆炸性的是，《金融时报》报道称，范德莱昂在未与成员国协商的情况下，批准了与科技公司达成的数十亿美元的数据管理和人工智能交易。

欧洲议员指责她进行秘密外交，加剧了内部紧张局势，并最终导致她辞职。

路透社于2025年7月10日报道，在她离任前不久，她曾与国际金融机构就网络安全和国防技术私人基金举行秘密会谈。一些人怀疑她正计划在全球强势回归。

《你的活跃》杂志于2025年7月12日报道了她与一个美国财团的秘密会谈，可能是为了在一个国际人工智能和数字安全组织中谋得一个职位。范德莱昂究竟是要离开欧洲舞台，还是正在计划在全球崛起？从经济角度来看，她的辞职可能带来毁灭性的后果。

据彭博社报道，欧元暴跌，政府债券承压。如果没有明确的继任计划，一段动荡时期即将到来。在布鲁塞尔，一场围绕其继任者的权力斗争爆发。一些国家支持技术官僚，另一些国家则支持欧盟的政治转型。如果没有达成共识，2027年至2030年每年约150亿欧元的关键投资项目可能会受到威胁。

“欧洲观察”等活动人士声称，范德·利昂已经收到了国际组织高层职位的邀请。在许多国家，主权主义政党正在获得支持，因为他们呼吁国家独立，在危机中找到了肥沃的土壤。

对许多人来说，她的辞职象征着欧盟中央集权模式的失败。欧洲正处于历史性的十字路口：改革还是解体。

乌尔苏拉·范德雷利昂的突然辞职，为欧洲大陆的未来开启了一个决定性的转折点。

人们对此有何看法？这一步是否不可避免？她的人生轨迹又将走向何方？答案尚无定论，但有一点是明确的。欧洲的历史正处于自欧盟成立以来最具戏剧性的篇章之一。未来几个月将见证改革是否可行，或者政治联盟是否面临深刻的裂痕。

Shock Resignation in Brussels: EU Power Center in Crisis 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1_ES_tpM_E

2025年9月13日 The shock resignation of Ursula von der Leyen has sent ripples across Europe. As the President of the European Commission steps down, the EU faces unprecedented political instability, protests in the streets, and a deepening divide among member states.

The political pressures and intrigues behind von der Leyen’s departure
Clashes over energy, migration, and the EU Sovereignty Fund
The growing tensions between Germany, France, Italy, and Hungary
Economic and global consequences of this historic momentm,Is Europe on the verge of reform or disintegration? Watch to understand the crisis shaking the heart of the European Union.

The era of Ursula Vanderelion stands at
a crossroads. The president of the
European Commission, one of the most
powerful women in Europe, is preparing
her resignation, and no one can say for
sure which forces pushed her to this
step. Was it political pressure,
intrigues from within her own ranks, or
simply the burden of a fractured
continent?
One thing is certain, Europe is in
turmoil. Rumors, power games, and
uncertainty overshadow every corner of
the Brussels power apparatus.
According to Politico, a state of
emergency reigns in the circles of the
EU headquarters. Bondelion's unexpected
departure plunges the European Union
into a deep institutional crisis.
Diverging views on foreign policy,
energy supply, budget issues, and
strategic alliances are now coming to
the surface. The European Council is
divided and the member states are
struggling to redefine the political
line. As Lefiguro reports, heads of
state and government are irritated and
perplexed. The reasons for the
resignation remain mysterious. In the
corridors of power, images are leaking
out that speak louder than any official
statement. Ursula Vanderlayion is said
to have broken into tears during a
heated meeting after the delegations of
Italy and Hungary led by Georgia Maloney
and Victor Orban demonstratively walked
out.
Officially, this will never be
confirmed, but in politics, perception
is reality. The rumor spread like
wildfire and symbolized an EU not only
divided, but on the verge of a political
breakdown.
The ground in Brussels had already been
shaking. On August 22nd, 2025, the
commission had to deny rumors that
Vander Lion had been excluded from a
meeting with Donald Trump and other
heads of state. Her spokesperson
rejected this, but the mistrust had
already been sown. In this tense
climate, the drama unfolded around new
budget rules and the planned EU
sovereignty fund. At first glance, an
ambitious plan, joint debt to finance
green projects and the defense industry.
But for Italy and Hungary, this fund was
a provocation. Rome was to process
150,000 additional asylum applications
while Budapest was required either to
take in 50,000 migrants or pay billions
in penalties. An energy solidarity
mechanism forced Hungary to supply gas
into the European grid at a capped
price. A direct attack on Orban's energy
policy. For Maloney and Orban, this was
not mere negotiation tactics, but a
fundamental rejection of the centralist
agenda. Their demonstrative walkout was
the climax of the collision with
Brussels.
Bandonderion's emotional reaction,
whether tears of frustration or a sign
of breakdown, symbolizes the crisis of a
federalist dream colliding with the
harsh reality of national interests.
It marked the moment when the commission
president had to realize that she was no
longer leading, but witnessing the
collapse of her authority.
At the same time, protests flared on the
streets. While debates continued in
Brussels, farmers in Germany, France,
and Poland blocked highways. They
protested against Green Deal
requirements, nitrogen limits, fow land
obligations, and duty-free Ukrainian
grain measures pushed forward by the
commission. The rebellion of the
governments in Rome and Budapest was
thus part of a broader popular movement
already visible in Bavaria's fields and
Western Europe's ports. The FrancoGerman
axis also showed cracks. On August 28th,
a meeting in Paris revealed the growing
distance between Berlin and Paris.
Germany, weakened by economic downturn
and stagnating industrial production,
could not take on a leadership role.
Chancellor Friedrich Merittz spoke of
the need for compromise, but Berlin was
too weak to stabilize a divided Europe.
In France, the crisis deepened. Prime
Minister Francois Beeru announced a vote
of no confidence triggered by a Brussels
imposed austerity plan of 44 billion
euros intended to bring France's budget
deficit below the EU's 3% threshold.
Street protests in Marseilles against
the austerity measures which mainly hit
the lower classes made the tensions
visible. President Macarron defended the
cuts but at the same time raised the
military budget by 6.5 billion. A
contradictory message.
The events of the last week of August
painted a picture of a continent in
political instability. Votes of no
confidence, street protests, and
contradictory statements from the
capitals revealed a union more divided
than ever. Vanderion's authority
crumbled because it had stood on fragile
ground from the beginning. In 2019, she
was not directly elected by the people,
but was the result of a compromise
between Merkel and Macron.
Without a direct mandate, her power
depended on the goodwill of the heads of
state and government, precisely those
who are now abandoning her. Added to
this were old scandals and affairs. Her
time as German defense minister was
marked by consultant scandals in which
millions were spent on external advisers
while tanks, ships, and aircraft of the
Bundes were in a deplorable state. This
reputation of mismanagement followed her
to Brussels.
Then came the Faizgate scandal. banished
text messages from negotiations over a
35 billion euro vaccine deal fueled
suspicion that Vanderion was above the
rules. The ongoing investigation by the
European public prosecutor reinforced
this impression. Meanwhile, member state
policies escalated tensions. Georgio
Maloney spoke of a stop against Brussels
while Pedro Sanchez called for
solidarity, a subtle criticism of
Italy's solo path.
In central and eastern Europe, many
countries secretly saw that the
commission, which had lectured them on
rule of law, was now facing a rebellion.
Polls from August 26th showed a
significant decline in trust in EU
institutions, especially in southern and
central Europe. But why did Vander Lion
resign precisely now? According to
Spiegel, confidential documents reveal
that strategic contracts in cyber
security and energy resources were
negotiated behind closed doors doors
without member state oversight. Analysts
interpret this as a signal of an
unprecedented transparency crisis. Even
more explosive, Financial Times reported
that Vander Lion approved multi-billion
deals with tech corporations on data
management and AI without consulting
member states.
European parliamentarians accused her of
secret diplomacy that exacerbated
internal tensions and ultimately
triggered her resignation.
Reuters reported on July 10th, 2025 that
shortly before her departure, she held
secret talks with international
financial institutions about a private
fund for cyber security and defense
technologies. Some suspect she is
planning a spectacular global comeback.
Your active reported on July 12th, 2025
about discrete meetings with a US
consortium, possibly for a position in
an international organization for AI and
digital security. Is Vander Lion leaving
the European stage or is she planning a
global rise to power? Economically, her
resignation could have devastating
consequences. According to Bloomberg,
the euro plunged and government bonds
came under pressure.
Without a clear succession plan, a phase
of instability looms. In Brussels, a
power struggle erupted over her
successor. Some states favor a
technocrat, others, a political
reorientation of the EU.
Without consensus, key investment
projects from 2027 to 2030, amounting to
around 15 billion e annually, could be
jeopardized. Activists such as Europe
Watch claim that Vander Lion has already
received offers for top positions in
international organizations. In many
countries, sovereigntist parties are
gaining support as their call for
national independence falls on fertile
ground in the crisis. For many, her
resignation symbolizes the failure of
the centralist EU model. Europe stands
at a historic crossroads, reform or
disintegration. The shock resignation of
Ursula Vanderelion opens a decisive
junction for the continent's future.
What do people think? Was this step
inevitable? And where will her path lead
now? The answers remain uncertain, but
one thing is clear. Europe's history is
in one of its most dramatic chapters
since the founding of the Union. The
coming months will show whether reforms
are possible or whether the political
union faces a deep rupture.