新部落
I think, therefore I am. - René Descartes
英国的
The Economist 杂志，一向以严肃著称，刊登的绝大多数都是有关时事政经之类的艰涩文章，难得看到它轻松的一面。也许是因为节日的缘故，去年最后一期的圣诞专栏，刊登了一组赏心悦目的散文，内容涉及旅游，历史，书评等等，让人耳目一新。尤其是下面的这篇
The End of The Pier，将栈桥码头的历史，现状，建筑，文化，掌故等等熔于一炉，并用诗意的语言将那些细腻的个人感受传达出来，
读来十分动人心弦，是我最喜欢的一篇。昨天清理旧杂志，突然又翻到这篇文章，想到应该转来与有兴趣的朋友们共享，尤其是那些喜欢码头甚至与我一样有“码头情结”的朋友们。
青岛的栈桥
提到栈桥码头，很自然就想到了青岛的栈桥。青岛是我最喜欢的城市之一，而对青岛的怀念和回忆，大多都与大海以及前海沿的栈桥有关。记得在国内时每次去青岛，除了公务以外，第一件事情就是去造访栈桥。印象最深的一次是傍晚和一位朋友去夜游栈桥，我们在栈桥上来回的散步，相谈甚欢，至深夜而不归。夕阳西下，海水由浅蓝色渐次变成黛绿色，不远处的小青岛也渐渐没入漆黑的夜色中，唯有小岛上的的灯塔在不停的闪烁，似乎在顽强地向黑夜中的大海证明小岛的存在，给夜行的航船 送去慰藉。胶州湾上吹来潮湿带有咸味的熏软海风，耳边充满了海水拍打栈桥发出的波涛声。。。。。。
Navy Pier，Chicago
来美国以后，也看过许多的栈桥码头，印象比较深刻的是芝加哥的 Navy Pier，还有威斯康星的 Kenosha North Pier。芝加哥的 Navy Pier 是我所见到的最大的栈桥码头（据说是世界上最大的），宽接近300英尺，长达3，000英尺。由于面积过大，给人以尾大不掉的感觉，造型上先少了几分灵气；再加上商业化，除了尽头可以远眺密歇根湖以外，主要的部分店铺林立，娱乐场里人声噪杂，空气中充溢着快餐和咖啡的香气弄得人饥肠辘辘，加上杂耍卖艺的，粉墨登场演唱的；徜徉其间，carnival 的气氛把人挤压的没有了暇想的空间，更缺少那份纯净的”栈桥的感觉“。与其说是游览栈桥码头，倒不如说更像是走进了一家浸淫在现代商业文化气氛中的主题公园。
Kenosha North Pier，Wisconsin
与芝加哥的 Navy Pier 相比，威斯康星的 Kenosha North Pier 规模要小多了，但其造型简洁洗练，增之一分则肥，减之一分则瘦，没有一点多余的地方。栈桥的尽头，矗立着一座拔地而起的血红色灯塔，在蓝天碧水中显得耀眼夺目。远远看去，很像是一副 modernistic 的图画，十分有空灵感。可能这就是它得到许多人青睐的一个原因吧。当初人们建造栈桥的初衷，更多的是出于实际功用方面的考虑，美学上的诉求应该只是一个附带的产品。随着时间的推移，它的经济功能逐渐消失，栈桥码头慢慢成了人们的审美对象。据说，最早建造 Kenosha North Pier 时，灯塔是白色的，只是后来有人提议才把它漆成了红色。从白色变成红色，整个画面养眼提神多了，灯塔因此成了整个画面的点睛之笔。也许是因为地处偏僻，Kenosha North Pier 一般游人不多，至少我去的几次是这样。我喜欢 Kenosha North Pier，是它带来的那种辽阔，纯静，遥远和简单的感觉，还有红蓝绿白色搭配在一起的画面给视觉上带来的愉悦。如果天气好有心情的话，Kenosha North Pier 的确是一个周末或节假日跑去出神发呆的好去处。
如果说建筑除了其功用和美学上的诉求以外，还同时也是人类表达主观意向的手段的话。那么，栈桥所要表达的是什麽呢？我想，栈桥所要表达的应该是人类对浪漫情怀的一种追求，是对远方的友邦发出的盛情邀请，是陆地向水域的延伸，是人类对征服海洋的向往，是人类从有限向无限不懈的探索。。。。。。
（above photos, in public domain, from Wikipedia & other Internet source)
～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～～
The End of The Pier
“‘A COLD night,’ Cubbitt said. The old gentleman swivelled his eyes on him like opera glasses and went on coughing: hack, hack, hack: the vocal chords dry as straw. Somewhere out at sea a violin began to play: it was like a sea beast mourning and stretching towards the shore.”
The book is Graham Greene's “Brighton Rock”; the violin is playing, unseen through sea mist, in the concert hall on the West Pier. Both Brighton's piers have starring roles in the story: they are the stages where killings are discussed, threats made, fortunes told. Savage gang warfare is intercut with candy floss and penny-in-the-slot machines. Laughter keeps pace with horror. Life is at its bawdiest and most reckless, but death lurks everywhere. This is the essence of piers.
No construction is more appealing, or more redolent of mortality, than a jetty that sticks out from the shore. It tells men they can walk on water, and suggests they can stroll as far towards infinity as their engineering can take them. Piers symbolise escape from the everyday, from the shore, from work, from life itself. For that purpose, they are more reassuring than a ship: though planked and decked like one, and originally manned with pier-masters in crypto-naval uniforms, most are attached to solid rock. It can come as a sudden, giddying surprise, amid the fairground tat of piers, to see the sea crawling darkly under your feet as you sip your cup of tea, or a seagull flying below you. Early piers were mocked as “disappointed bridges”, fixed at one end but, at the other, yearning towards the void. A man on a pier never quite lets go of the land. But, seeing it from a distance and another angle, he becomes a little disoriented, and much more daring.
A century and a half ago, promoters of piers were surprised at this. They imagined that an entry toll, a penny in the turnstile, would keep the indecorous at bay and ensure that solemn middle-class promenaders could compare their bonnets and parasols in peace. Piers were a marine version of the parkland walks at spas, sedate and quiet. Grand balls, art exhibitions and royal visits took place on them, while the plebs bobbed below on small boats and craned their necks to see.
Yet as soon as working men, too, were given official holidays and allowed to have fun on Sundays, piers ran down-market. At first, the poor man paid his penny to sit and observe the higher classes and to dream he might be like them. Then, gradually, he shed the conventions that restrained him. He could be rude on the pier, gawking at What the Butler Saw or buying saucy postcards in which breasts were confused with blancmange; he could buy chips, candy floss and silly trinkets he would never want at home; he could cram on silly hats, and the girls could wear skirts that whipped well above their knees in the wind. (“Young ladies”, carped Queen in 1900, “give themselves up to abandon on piers.”) Soon the pier managers not only accepted this, but also encouraged it, by getting rid of the turnstiles and tolls that had provided, in the 19th century, 80-90% of takings. They could profit instead from the mob's adventurousness: that sense of being in limbo, neither on sea nor on land, suspended in a state of fantasy.
Pink paint and corrosion
Most piers still encapsulate 19th-century dreams. They are lined with pleasure domes, octagonal kiosks, maharajahs' palaces and Ottoman minarets, their lattice and lacework done in iron instead of shining marble. They offered, from the beginning, the latest proofs of man's prowess: telescopes, the telegraph, radio broadcasting, moving pictures, besides the marvellous ingenuity of their own construction. Eugenius Birch, Britain's greatest pier-builder and the inventor of the screw-pile, was almost as well known in his day as Stephenson or Brunel. The stalking girders of piers subdued the mighty deep, or at least half a mile of it, and their twinkling electric lights crept out bravely from the shore; in Atlantic City, New Jersey, no fewer than 27,000 outlined the Steel Pier against the dark. In Britain pleasure piers grew from every nook of the coast just as the Empire expanded, and the blare of military bands along their decks echoed the triumphal march of colonisers overseas.
But dreams don't last. Look over the rail on any pier, and the rust is inch-thick and flaking from its girders. Green weed and grey barnacles encrust every part under the sea. Within five years, every plank on the deck will need replacing. The annual slaps of paint—sea-green for the railings, bright pink for the doughnut stall—cannot disguise the fact that the layers are plastered round corrosion.
Of 81 piers round the British coast at their zenith, in 1908, 26 have gone. Of dozens in America (though America never knew the craze as Britain did), only seven major piers remain. Occasionally their bones still lie on the shoreline like the remains of behemoths, too costly to demolish and, in their way, a memento mori that people wish to preserve. Atlantic City has the Garden Pier, a warped spine of concrete sprouting grass; in Brighton, the West Pier concert hall where Cubbitt's violin played is now a humped ribcage half-submerged in the sea. Visitors still stand like mourners at a funeral, silent and thoughtful, and pick rust from its girders. The fluted columns that once held glass weather screens, the lampstands with their coiling serpents, the flowering and curling iron balustrades, are stored in heaps under the sea wall. All that proud work is decaying and disappearing, as inevitably as the tides come in and out.
Million-dollar dreams
The fates of piers are easily written. They rot, collapse or are eaten by sandworms. Ships crash into them. Gales and high seas remove whole sections of them, shot-blasting them with shingle or sand until they break. The wooden decks, the drying wind and the obsessive, repeated coats of paint feed enormous fires, still the main reason for their demise. Their very frailty, a mere network of girders, is preferred to the reinforced concrete that might make them last. When they die it may be in a peculiarly human way, heaving and shuddering along their whole length before they founder. Yet most pier-deaths are slower. The gates are padlocked; the pier is closed; owners, council and preservationists argue; the elements do their work.
A natural disaster is often the last straw for pier-owners. Piers have to pay for themselves, and few make profits nowadays; even at their peak in the 1860s, they never brought in the promised dividend to investors. They are monuments to 19th-century speculation, to the new delights of limited companies and shareholder security, and to dreams. In the glory days of piers, the middle classes and tradesmen of seaside towns bought shares in them to dip a cautious toe in the stock market, and town corporations saw them as the key to prosperity and the apogee of development. All were eventually disappointed.
Almost no new piers are being built now. To put up such a structure, working largely under sand-filled water, costs three to five times what it would on land for perhaps 50 years of life. Rising sea levels, too, increase the stress caused by the waves. So the old are repaired and recycled according to the swings of fashion, their life a ceaseless struggle against erosion and decline. True, there are success stories, or dreams of success. On Brighton's Palace Pier, where the Noble Organisation has invested in a dazzling array of slot machines and fairground rides, entry is free, as are deckchairs in which to sit and watch the sights of London-by-the-sea. Southwold Pier, in Suffolk, has reinvented itself as a cream-painted string of upmarket boutiques (“Seaweed and Salt”) and ingenious automata, such as a “quantum tunnelling telescope” that preserve the traditional inventiveness of piers. Southend Pier has acquired a new entrance that is all curving steel and glass; Boscombe Pier, next to Bournemouth, hopes to be revived by a £1.4m artificial surf-reef being built beside it; Brighton West's remains may be incorporated into a gigantic viewing tower, the i360, in which people will rise in the air, on a vertical pier, rather than walk on water.
No British pier has gone as far as the Pier Shops at Caesar's in Atlantic City, where, in the shadow of a gigantic Roman-style casino, an enclosed street of glittering boutiques winds over the waves. The pier is in fact part of the casino, a similar gamble. Despite the eternal hope of money from somewhere, even the healthiest specimens seem financially on the edge.
Today's piers have no monopoly on thrills: most of those lurk under the pier, a dark demi-monde of corroded columns, braces and lattice-work where, at low tide, there is just enough sand for the young or the desperate to have sex on. Pier-decks are largely the resort of the old, who sit in cardigans out of the wind and watch the young passing. But they still hold out the possibility of sudden wealth, if the grabber-arm can avoid the giant cuddly toys and instead unlock, in a glittering torrent, the glassed-in trove of silver. The empty gaze of the old into the distance is mirrored in the gaze of the young into slot machines.
Atlantic City once had Young's Million-Dollar Pier, which became Hamid's Million-Dollar Pier: although gambling was never allowed there, the name encapsulated both brassy new entertainment and the off-chance of getting rich. But serious spending, or winning, has seldom been seen on piers. A more reliable living could be made, in the old days, by urchins diving the waters or strolling the sands to pick up pens and watches dropped through the boards by promenaders, or coins tossed through the rails.
Even an empty jetty, like the melancholy Steeplechase Pier at Coney Island in New York, draws Russian and Chinese fishermen eager to net the tiny fish that gleam in silver schools round the piles, for the little fry will catch bigger fish, and the bigger ones (mostly herring) are worth curing and eating. Their bicycles carry industrial-size grab-nets, rice sacks and white plastic buckets in which crabs clamber slowly. On Southend Pier, the world's longest, which ends after 1.34 miles in water so deep that flounder, mackerel, cod and plaice can be caught in it, a grey August day finds knots of anglers at every shelter. Some sit companionably on a seat dedicated to an absent colleague, “Loved by everyone who knew him, except the fish.”
In early years, invalids were restored to health by being wheeled above the sea. With copious lungfuls of that “life-prolonging air” inside them, they would be themselves again. The healthy, besides sea-walking, were offered reading rooms and showers at the shore end. Self-improvement and piers went together. Self-knowledge, too: your picture taken, your voice recorded, as soon as technology allowed it. On Southwold Pier the “Expressive Photo-Booth”, which moves while you're in it, captures “Your True Personality: Thrilled, Exhilarated, Distracted, Weightless”. Pier-strollers still like to read their astral charts, cast by Gypsy Rose Lee or her descendants and printed out on pink slips of paper; they discover “the unique side of you” by obtaining from a lurid kiosk the meaning of their surname, or the details of the day they were born.
Into the unknown
This sense of self-discovery was particularly strong, and is still strongest, at the very end of the pier. Traditionally the pierhead was where steamers would arrive and depart, and where roads ended; Santa Monica Pier, in California, marked the place where Route 66 petered out into the ocean. At the pierhead prudent promenaders, blown to the limit of their endurance, would have to grip their hats and turn back. But in the film “Mona Lisa” the end of Brighton's Palace Pier becomes a horrifying cul-de-sac from which the characters barely escape.
When open-air dancing became the rage, pierheads were the place for its erotic riskiness. The biggest ballroom in the world could be found, from 1904-11, at the end of the Dreamland Pier in Coney Island, before the flames destroyed it. Nude bathing was still allowed from the ends of piers long after it was banned from the beaches. They were the haunt, too, of performing swimmers, who would drink cups of tea, or lie and read the paper, in the sea; above them, “professors of natation” would perform death-defying plunges in chains or into fire. At Bognor, and elsewhere, men did their best to fly from the end of the pier. In Atlantic City the divers were horses, plunging 40 feet into a tank of water with a bareback rider clinging on.
Many piers had theatres at their heads, typically the first parts to close or burn down. The shows put on there—pantomimes, stand-up comedy, mysteries and thrillers—catered for the happily undiscriminating, and plays and actors invalided out of London's West End could limp on there for years. Playing the pier was a particular challenge, from shouting against the elements to struggling along the deck with the flats to putting on costume with the swimmers, in a cubicle among the piles. But it launched careers. An actor who could tread the stage in the middle of the sea, cheekily ad-libbing into the huge darkness, could put up with most reverses—and could catch fish through the planking in the interval.
The end of the pier is the ultimate dare, the part most likely to be cut off by fire or a drifting vessel as the last girders snap. It offers the last laugh, the last reckless, stupid act, in the face of death; in “Brighton Rock”, it is where Pinkie shows Rose the bottle of vitriol that will dissolve him. On the Pier at Caesar's the casual stroller, at the end of the dimly-lit mall that might be anywhere, finds a thunderous neon-lit water show and then suddenly, through huge glass doors, the shock of the silent sea itself. The man-made entertainment is put in its place by the power of nothingness.
Traditionally the end of the pier is the place for suicide, where people feel they can go no farther; recently it has also become a favourite spot for “tombstoning”, leaping into the water for the hell of it. “Think before you jump”, read the posters on Brighton's Palace Pier. “Do you know what's down there?” Of course not; no one does; but the urge to find out may be stronger than any instinct to obey.
The end of the pier is also the place for what is euphemistically called “scattering”, the dispersal of the ashes of the dead. “Good day for a scattering”, they say at Southend, meaning that the wind is south-westerly and won't blow the departed back into the faces of his friends. The train along the pier, the Sir John Betjeman, often acts as a funeral hearse for groups of quiet people in anoraks, or chatty Indian families with plastic bags of marigolds to scatter on the grey North Sea. An hour after high tide is the recommended time; the east slipway of the pierhead is favoured, less because the east symbolises resurrection than because at that point only, between the dreary arms of the Essex coast and the refineries of the Isle of Grain, there is a gap of open sea.
People's feelings on piers are well summed up at Southwold in Suffolk, where the neat and witty restoration of the pier has been financed in part by selling small plaques along the railings. There are 3,000 of them, a few years old but already as worn, out in the salt wind, as medieval brasses. Most are memorials to parents, dogs, friends, nans, or the purchasers themselves. Being where they are, they are cheekier and more intimate than gravestones. “In memory of Ted Smith: It must be Wednesday”. “Alexander Robert Kearton: ‘Just resting my eyes’”. “William Scrivener Waters: Left for London, April 1853”.
Being where they are, too, some plaques become philosophical. “To infinity and beyond”. “We flew our kite and lost it here”. “For Robin: Gone into the mystic”. “Bethan and Benedict Evans: So you found it then.” And, perhaps inevitably, those lines from e.e.cummings:
For whatever we lose (like a you or a me)
It's always ourselves we find in the sea
(above photos from the website of The Economist)
“一夜情”这个词，只有在你的这个留言里听着顺耳且别有韵味;-)
我对大海的“一夜情”在南戴河，那夜的大海让我有扑进他怀里一探究里的感觉;-)
刚刚去看了你的照片，照得很好。夕阳下的栈桥，应该是最能传达那一份缱绻之情了。
谢谢！
美丽的文字。。。http://i13.tinypic.com/6stcpig.jpg
Sunrise in Cocco Beach
网上栈桥是一个很好的联想！ 你说对了，我的ID是 an e drifter。我们都是世界公民啊，在不同的文化部落里漂流，无根的漂流。。。。这个课题可以弄一篇专门的文章来谈谈了。：））
祝好！
谢谢落梅天朋友的分享！落梅天，很有诗意的ID。
巧得恨，我和大海的“初恋”也是在青岛，但“一夜情”却是在烟台。：）
再次谢谢，常来！
edrifter是什么意思？ an e drifter? 这是一个 e 世纪，不能一天无e，而且很有些网上栈桥的意思，哈哈哈。。。
你说的对，生活的境界不在于占有多少，而在于如何去感受、去体验。所以，与其说我们拥有生活，不如说生活拥有我们，而我想做的，就是如何将更多自己让生活去拥有。
很高兴认识你。
顺向落梅天姑娘问好！
谢谢苏乡门地朋友的留言。很高兴你喜欢！圣比兹堡的栈桥，我还没有见过，有机会一定去看。
喜欢你的ID，幽默风趣尽在不言之中。 ：））
谢谢罢了朋友的留言分享这些精致的心理感受！十分喜欢。
断桥，残雪，寂寞，孤舟，古道，小桥，渔村，幽径，孤烟，暮云。。。。。读着你的这些文字，我突然想到一个不相关的问题：人生真正的财富是什麽？人生在世，物质的东西固不可少， 但假如没有一颗敏感，细致的心灵去触摸，感知世界，再好的东西也不过是身外之物。生活的最高境界不在于你占有多少， 而在于你如何去占有。
与你一样，我也是爱屋及乌因为喜欢大海而喜欢栈桥，对海喜欢到了痴迷的程度。你说得很对，大海的确是能够在人的“生命深处唤起一种与天相融的神圣感”。有空常来，大家多交流。
昨晚看过，又回来重读，真是赏心悦耳得好文。
最后一次看过走过的一个栈桥，是坦帕下面圣比兹堡市的那个，很美丽，但好像只能看倒日落。 谢谢分享。
读着动人的文字，看着一座又一座美丽的栈桥，行趟在善感的音乐中，我脑海中不由闪过冷清的西湖“断桥残雪”，闪过驿外断桥边、在风和雨中寂寞摇曳着的小花，闪过从春雨断桥人不渡的柳阴中撑出水面来的孤单的小舟，闪过古道西风中走过小桥流水人家疲惫的瘦马，闪过隐隐渔村、断桥幽径中向晚的落寞孤烟。。。内心不由自主生出一股“暮云过了，秋光老尽，故人千里”的悲秋迟暮之感与客处异乡的伤别意绪。。。（说好不酸的又酸了，哈哈哈。。。）
西雅图靠海，靠海的地方有不少栈桥，我常喜欢在夏天带外州来访的朋友们到附近的Kirkland Beach走走，那里有一个靠Beach的饭店，我很喜欢一边吃着法国点心、喝着咖啡，一边聆听着脚下的流水拍打岸石的声音；我还喜欢看着远方的栈桥，喜欢看栈桥上牵着手的情侣们和欢快奔走的孩子们，喜欢任凭一股温馨感动的暖流荡漾全身。。。
我喜欢一切和水有关的东西，我喜欢西雅图的雨，我喜欢西雅图的栈桥，我喜欢西雅图的Beach，我更喜欢那个能看到太平洋的西港。我对大海有一种与生俱来的钟爱，我曾在一篇网友写海的文章后写道：“我从小就喜欢海，以前每次坐海轮去探望父母时，我内心总会涌动着一种期待的激动。我喜欢站在海轮上看日出，喜欢看日出瞬间，那片让人无法逼视，整个水面散发出的灿烂耀眼的光芒。在那一刻，我心中空无一物，但却又深切地感觉到一种美的极致，虽然那灿烂的瞬间短得不能再短，但足够让我用长长的一天去回味，而那份极致的、令人屏息的美，在我生命深处唤起了一种与天地相融的神圣感，一种深沉、美丽、忧伤的感动，这种神圣感与感动，值得用我的一生去追行与回溯。。。”
感谢楼主贴出此文与大家分享。