魔鬼在细节里。刘的律师有一句话很关键“女方很主动”

其它的证据都不如这一条致命。其它的都是旁证，俩人关起门来以后发生的才是关键。可女方很主动（acitve and willing to participant)这一条就说明了女方是自愿的。但后来后悔了想要钱。 

下面是刘强东律师的原文。刘的律师经验丰富，对外披露的也都是经过法庭认可的内容，可信度高。律师说女方在房间里“很主动”（女上位？），可两个人关起门来的事情外人怎么知道主动不主动？明显刘的律师有了“女方很主动”的直接或者间接证据。 

那么证据是什么呢？大家接着开脑洞使劲挖一挖？

我想刘强东鹅别的名人一样，对这种事情也是三不，不拒绝，不承诺，不负责。 而且以他的身份一定有暗中的防范措施。没准进屋以后就用手机录音／录像，以备后用。女的如果下套，估计也会暗中录音录像，但录下来的证据并不支持她起诉刘强东强奸她。反而给警方和检方认为她是自愿的。

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/21/technology/jd-com-richard-liu-rape.html

Ms. Brisbois said that the woman invited Mr. Liu into her apartment building and that “what happened in the room was entirely consensual.”

“The woman was an active and willing participant and at no time did she indicate in any way that she did not consent,” Ms. Brisbois said. 

"在房间里发生的一切都是自愿的。该女士整个过程都很主动，没有任何不情愿的表示。" 

 

明尼苏达检方也说没有找到刘犯罪的证据，“it did not find enough evidence to pursue a case against Mr. Liu”。 

警察和检方不仅没找到证据，而且还说俩人的行为是自愿的。

“As is the case in too many sexual assault incidents, it was a complicated situation,” Mike Freeman, the Hennepin County attorney, said in a statement. “It is also similar to other sexual assault cases with the suspect maintaining the sex was consensual.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/21/technology/jd-com-richard-liu-rape.html