ChineseAchilles的博客
历史，人文的海外随想
正文
基本和大清是一个路数，没有战斗力就开始胡吹，到处炫耀，大清还是有点战斗力的，这个航母在飞机着舰技术不成熟时，就搞调成军，军委主席白排场，大事宣传，航母要是没飞机是个摆样子的靶船，所谓会咬的狗不叫，可见高层的策划就是一帮退化的老头，还要去和老美叫板，看了让人一身汗。。。
着舰的那位是特技飞行大队的尖子，其他的水平可想而知，像这种水平的，二战时，日本人没有上千也有几百，美国人就更不计其数了，可见吹了半天差距有多大，就像国内吹得最高水平，最高大奖也就是这边一个合格生而已。。。呵呵。。。继续吹吧，吹得自己不知道是谁时，大概就是甲午再现时了。。。
你不是说老美从47年到如今都是手控操作降落吗？
现代飞机使用电操控制系统，飞机的操纵是飞行员通过操纵杆给出信号，电脑控制机械。所以加自动着陆功能很容易。老弟可能是文科学生，不知道这些东东。
情绪化了不是，楼主赶紧来删YY的帖 :-)
pls stick to business.
Autonomous landing on a carrier is nothing new, though so far there’s always a pilot sitting in the airplane to take over when the system is pushed to the limit. Carrier based aircraft have used auto land capabilities since the late 1950s when the automatic carrier landing system (ACLS) was developed. The ACLS uses an aircraft’s autopilot, coupled to the instruments a pilot would normally use to land on a carrier to guide an airplane to the carrier deck. ACLS can take an aircraft all the way to touchdown, though most pilots prefer to make the landing themselves.
Where the real challenge is for automated landing systems is getting the aircraft the final few feet to the carrier deck when the weather is less than ideal. The ACLS can fly an airplane to the aircraft carrier in stormy conditions, but those final few seconds to touchdown can be a real challenge when the deck is pitching and rolling in the swells. This is what pilots say is the single biggest challenge of flying from an aircraft carrier. Developing the autonomous recovery capabilities for all weather conditions is going to be one of the biggest challenges facing the X-47B team.
As background, ACLS provided by BELL has been installed to 5+ US carriers.
Well, that is why I have the impression that the pilot would rather place the fate on their own hands instead of on ACLS, at least currently.
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/military/read.main/8819/
Carriers are fitted with the Automatic Carrier Landing System which allow certain aircraft to be "auto-landed" onto the carrier. Not all carrier aircraft can use the system however. Whether it's popular with the aircrews is another matter. (I don't think it is.)
F-14s aren't equipped with ACLS (I don't think).
F-18s are.
Otherwise landings are all done visually day and night without any automatics.
There are flight deck lights and the drop line lights to help the pilot land onboard. If the carrier is operating close to friendly land, the returning aircraft have an option to divert to land, otherwise the carrier is the only place to land and the pilots just keep trying and trying until they get back onboard.
The fun part is when they turn out the flight deck lights, try landing with NVGs Smile I think helo pilots have it harder when they are using NVGs to land. Try putting a helo onto a pitching flight deck 100ft x 35ft wide with no lights at night. You realize very quickly how important peripheral vision is in trying to land. You're missing a lot of visual cues that you have during the day. There is no equivalent automatic landing system for helicopters.
Cheers Smile
Woodreau / KMVL
可是他们很谦虚，从1946到2012还在用人来控制战机在航母上降落，一点也不吹嘘说能够自动降落。
心中斩鬼，应该向他们学习。
辽宁号之所以今天才实现飞机起落，我想主要是根据航母测试规划的进度，是时间上的按排，并非是技术上有多难。现在国内做点事就吹，从总理，到百姓都是如此。
咋啦？