space

I just finished reading booklet of <The Brief History of Time> written by Stephen H.
The book's beginning part language usage is good, enjoyable. It is like Master's words and style, etc. But Gradually, The quality of the book degraded very much. Not only language usage, but also contents. It talked too many useless words, too rough in good contents. The illustration pictures could be much useful, and helpful. Nevertheless, I still learned (also by the help of other reading materials) the key point when talking general relativity. and felt human achievements in space study. I need to at least understand the underline meaning of Quantum Mechanics still though. I feel  bewilder if some of the theories have any reliable evidence such as matter/anti-matter, the existence of virtual pairs in empty space. Despite of these suspicious, I have got a better view when scientist talking about universe (different from space in concept), universe's time. our world etc.



Okay, this is only a test blog :)








第二篇日记: 我爱的女人不爱我.
还有5分钟,看个好玩的.正好就看到了这篇原闯:
http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/origin/583604.html







wenxuecity 真难用啊, 破编辑器,还要先去学习怎么用.一点都 not intuitive. 到了今天什么都是标准化了,难道文学城就还要与世界隔绝? 大到google, facebook, 小到地方网站www.51.ca 那个都是标准用法. 难道今天翻个书,是否也得去先看个说明? 真见鬼.和文学城88. ;)

[小燕子28]

Have a nice day!