得窥天境

得窥天境,须看透红尘万丈;人神相通,只凭借灵犀一缕。信靠耶稣,此外路路是绝望;坚定不移,万里迢迢聚天堂。
个人资料
博文
我个人认为是有干预的,但和默示时的方式不一样。若能看原文,最好看希伯来文的旧约和希腊文的新约,否则,就看最忠实原本的译本。我个人看NASB.[阅读全文]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
当然有神权干预,也有时干预。何时干预,干预什么,主权完全在神。[阅读全文]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
你听谁说抄写圣经就圣灵充满的?老嘁是不是这方面经验?
另外,圣经是圣灵默示通过人写成,和圣灵充满不是一码事。[阅读全文]
阅读 ()评论 (2)
一个神是真正的作者,二是原本圣经无误。
而本坛的讨论,多集中在一些具体经文和历史遗迹等等,我不认为完全没有意义,但真正很有说服力的又有多少?据我所知,许多认为有矛盾的已经得到合理解释。即使不能解释的还有可能是传抄的错误。怎能一遇到问题,就怀疑到圣经原本的有误上?
其实有一个我认为更重要的问题,老弟没注意到。[阅读全文]
阅读 ()评论 (2)
神默示的结果。再进一步说,没有对神的信靠,不会得出这个结论。若想祥解,我可以把芝加哥决议附上。
我个人认为不会有任何情况会影响这一认知。三一神是教会争论了两千年的事,在这个问题上,我粗算了一下,有十七个重要派别被定为异端。老弟可不要在方面诱我入歧途啊。[阅读全文]
阅读 ()评论 (4)
基本的逻辑推理总要有(拨雾正原集之四)
我也不准备长篇大论,也不想涉及其它,更不是对持这种观点的网友抱有成见,只是就事论事,希望有关网友参考,共同提高本论坛讨论的水准。(括号里的是原网友文,横线部分是讨论重点)
第一点“总说基督徒撒谎”,这个说法似乎很绝对,我记得该位网友是大力提倡相对真理的,怎么忽然就绝对起来。起码有点缺乏一致[阅读全文]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
(2006-12-05 21:42:34)
Withparasite
ThefollowingisapostwithresponsefromtheCARMdiscussionboardonabortionwithapersonnamedChad.TheoriginalpostisinbrownwithCARM'sresponseingreen.
-----------
Jamie:Idon'tthinkmanypeoplewouldrefertotheirpregnancyasaparasite,butitisinfact,scientificallydescriptiveandprovidesabasisforunderstandingthebuilt-intrapsinherentindiscussingthe"righttolife"arguments.
Matt:Inorderforistom...[阅读全文]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
(2006-12-05 21:42:08)
Killingunwantedchildren

ThefollowingisapostwithresponsefromtheCARMdiscussionboardonabortionwithapersonnamedChad.TheoriginalpostisinbrownwithCARM'sresponseingreen.
-----------
Tilk:Mostpro-lifeadvocatesarguethatabortionisthemurderofchildrenbeforetheyareborn.ShouldtherebeANYconsiderationofthequalityoflifeforunwantedchildren.Considerthis.
1)Legalizedabortionleadstofewer"unwanted"...[阅读全文]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
(2006-12-05 21:41:10)
Whatistherealissue?
ThefollowingisapostwithresponsefromtheCARMdiscussionboardonabortionwithapersonnamedChad.TheoriginalpostisinbrownwithCARM'sresponseingreen.
-----------
Chad:Thefollowingstatements:
Theremightbepersonalreasonsawomandoesn'twanttogothroughwithapregnancy,
Awomanhasarighttobodilyintegritywhichisrecognizedasafundamentalright,
Noonecanuseanother'sbodilyresources...[阅读全文]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
(2006-12-05 21:40:11)
TheacornisnotatreeTheproabortionistssometimeusetheanalogyofanacornnotbeingatreeinordertodemonstratethatafetusisnothuman.Theysaythatjustastheacornhasthepotentialitytobeatree,thefetusalsohasthepotentialitytobeahuman;butsincepotentialityisdifferentfromactuality,itfollowsthat,actually,thefetusisnotahuman,andtheacornisnot,actually,atree.
Also,let'sassumeforthemomentthatthetreeinquestionisanoaktreea...[阅读全文]
阅读 ()评论 (3)
[<<]
[151]
[152]
[153]
[154]
[155]
[>>]
[首页]
[尾页]