华尔街日报读者揭露热比亚文章自相矛盾

华尔街日报读者揭露热比亚文章自相矛盾

热比亚在华尔街日报上发表文章颠倒黑白指责中国。但是从读者评论看，大部分人
完全站在反对她的那边。比如

Luther King 写到，这是他看到的最大胆的谎言，一边声称400维族人被杀，另一边
又说汉族人要报复。Luther King问到，如果是维族人被杀，汉族人还要报复什么呢？


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124698273174806523.html#mod%3Darticle-outset-
box%26articleTabs%3Dcomments

The darest lie I have ever seen. How could WSJ accept this article? It has no ground of standing at all. See those figures it is using:
Uighur sources within East Turkestan say that 400 Uighurs in Urumqi have died...
Most of the morale calls were based on this fact, that is Uighurs were the victims; but then at the very last, it says more Han Chinese are looking into revenge. OK, for what? If Uighurs were killed more than 400, what kind of revenge those Han are looking for? Revenge for killing more? Ridiculous logic.