The elites play games with our plant and our lives

John Mearsheimer | The elites play games with our plant and our lives

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVUCCLDUb-k

Chris Hedges Fan Club 6.21万位订阅者

解说词

0:00
I has several questions dealing with what kind of scenarios could be realistic for the war in Ukraine to end;  now given your distinctive positions how would you see that what would be a realistic scenario going forward for the war well.

I agree with Carl there when you ask Carl that question a slightly different form he basically said it's very hard to figure out where this train is headed I don't
0:25
know how this one is going to end
0:27
right I do want to go to Great Lengths
0:29
to make sure we don't end up getting uh
0:32
incinerated in a nuclear war but I don't
0:34
know where it's going to end because
0:36
what I hear you say also from your
0:38
intervention is that there is no obvious
0:39
end to this war because Russia is not
0:42
going to back down and the ukrainians
0:44
get the support for Europeans and the US
0:47
is also not going to back down right I
0:49
said that in my formal remarks
0:52
go back to this Russia Putin Putin is
0:54
not going to back down
0:56
and there might be a difference I I I
0:59
think there are a fair number of people
1:01
in Moscow even in senior positions who
1:03
would be interested in closing down this
1:05
war tomorrow
1:06
would they could would that include
1:09
Crimea withdrawing from Crimea probably
1:12
not probably not
1:14
so then we will be back to where we were
1:17
but uh prior to sort of February the
1:20
24th where we did not have an agreement
1:23
on Crimea and I think it could take
1:25
quite some time to get some sort of
1:27
solution to Crimea but I think the other
1:31
issues I would not consider it entirely
1:33
impossible that at some point in time we
1:36
get the change that sort of they
1:38
understand in Moscow that what they're
1:41
heading into into something that's got
1:43
to be danger for Russia not because we
1:46
are going to invade Moscow that's not
1:48
going to happen
1:50
but it's going to implode
1:52
and they will try to rescue what can be
1:55
rescued and go for something that might
1:58
be acceptable but that will only be
2:01
possible if we can give and and I think
2:04
we'll talk about the post Putin it's not
2:06
going to happen with Putin and it's also
2:08
going to be dependent us helping to
2:10
secure and and give a new future to
2:13
Ukraine because as I said if we don't
2:15
get a stable Ukraine
2:17
uh we will not get a stable Europe
2:19
because then there will be a constant
2:22
Temptation for I mean if you see some of
2:25
the loonies that are paraded on Russian
2:27
television these days they're truly
2:29
dangerous loonies parading there but
2:32
we'll give temptation to them but we do
2:34
not know where this war will end we do
2:36
not not know where Russia will end up
2:38
what we do know is that there is a
2:43
movement towards a geopolitical rivalry
2:46
where you have the UF and China coming
2:49
back to John's intervention and the U.S
2:52
Russia now where is Europe in all this
2:56
in the
2:59
now where is excuse me where is Europe
3:01
in that picture because the Rivalry is
3:06
primarily the dyad between the UF and
3:09
China on the one hand and you depicted
3:11
to be the U.S and Russia on the other so
3:13
it's a tripolar dynamic but where is
3:17
Europe in that dynamic
3:21
in that particular Dynamic I mean we are
3:23
John mentioned the Taiwan issue uh as
3:27
perhaps the most dangerous one which is
3:29
really is a very very different issue
3:31
because it's really done the resolve the
3:32
Civil War from 1949 and and the Chinese
3:36
want to sort of obey Jing once in some
3:39
sort of way primarily prevent Taiwan
3:41
from going independent they would
3:43
consider that something completely
3:45
unacceptable so we are distinctly in
3:48
favor of one China principle we say
3:50
however defined it somewhat differently
3:51
and we are in favor of a peaceful
3:53
resolution to it and we are distinctly
3:55
against
3:57
uh trying to resolve that by military
3:59
means then Europe is not a military
4:01
power in that part of the world we are
4:04
trading power we are diplomatic power
4:06
but we are not a military power with
4:07
that part of the world
4:09
yeah yeah uh I think uh the United
4:12
States is deeply committed to containing
4:15
if not uh rolling back Chinese power and
4:21
that containment strategy has two
4:24
Dimensions to it one is a military
4:26
Dimension and the other is an economic
4:28
Dimension and in terms of the military
4:30
Dimension the Europeans are going to
4:33
play hardly any role at all I think we
4:34
agree on that
4:36
where the Europeans are going to matter
4:38
is on the economic front and this is a
4:40
very tricky issue and they're of course
4:43
now lots of articles in the media on
4:45
this subject but the Europeans are going
4:49
to want to trade extensively with China
4:54
this is especially true given the
4:56
negative Economic Consequences of the
4:59
Ukraine war and it's no accident that
5:02
early last month the German Chancellor
5:05
went to Beijing and there's all sorts of
5:07
evidence the Europeans are thinking
5:09
about trading more and more with China
5:12
and of course the Europeans because they
5:14
have these sophisticated economies with
5:16
all these sophisticated technologies
5:18
will trade Technologies with the Chinese
5:22
which will enrage the Americans the
5:25
Americans are going to want the
5:26
Europeans to help Washington throttle
5:32
the Chinese economy you are not going to
5:35
have any interest in throttling the
5:37
Chinese economy you're going to have an
5:40
interest in enhancing your prosperity
5:43
facilitating economic growth and that
5:45
means more trade with Europe so I think
5:48
there is a potential
5:51
for significant tension between the
5:55
United States and Europe
5:57
over the whole issue of trade between
6:01
Europe and China
6:04
now is this not the challenge because we
6:07
have no good deterrent to prevent war
6:10
and instability in a more multi-polar
6:14
world and that means that we are moving
6:16
over to more hybrid measures now the new
6:19
U.S uh defense strategy talks about
6:23
integrated deterrence which is not only
6:25
military but which is also integrating
6:28
all other kinds of of domains all the
6:31
military domains but also sanctions and
6:33
a number of other institutional measures
6:36
now how does this look from the
6:39
perspective of Europe is Europe is the
6:41
EU ready for that world
6:44
I think to some extent Europe is more
6:46
ready than Americans are in the sense
6:48
that I said
6:50
um EU is very much a Hybrid Power if you
6:52
talk talk about all of the different
6:54
elements of hybrid Warfare they are
6:58
elements where there are instruments in
7:00
the hands of the European Union uh we
7:02
are not a military power we don't have
7:04
any armored divisions at all but we
7:07
coordinate cyber policies we coordinate
7:09
trade policies we coordinate migration
7:11
policies to a certain extent not always
7:13
a smashing success has to be said we
7:16
coordinate uh security sort of domestic
7:19
security Affairs that sort of thing that
7:22
is necessary in order to meet hybrid
7:24
threats we have I think more instruments
7:28
than the Americans have for obvious
7:30
reasons because the U.S continent has
7:33
not been fake as you said you live in
7:35
peace with the Canadians and the
7:36
Mexicans uh while we have been uh
7:39
exposed to these sorts of hybrid things
7:41
and accordingly have more instruments
7:44
so you think that Europe is well
7:46
equipped I wonder why it's well equipped
7:48
I mean shouldn't but but we are better
7:50
equipped and we are equipping ourselves
7:52
uh that I would argue but what do you
7:54
think of my argument that the Europeans
7:57
are going to trade with the Chinese in
8:00
ways that's going to anger The Americans
8:04
are we were going to trade with Chinese
8:05
we do or also the Americans do America
8:07
American yes exports you know what I'm
8:10
saying here high technology yeah on high
8:13
tech there's an element of tension
8:15
sometimes uh we have this sort of Chip
8:17
restrictions that came in the beginning
8:20
of October that affects a couple of
8:22
European companies that are less happy
8:24
there will be talks as a matter of fact
8:26
on Tuesday uh in Washington in the
8:30
traded Technology Council and see if we
8:31
can sort out these issues yeah yeah uh
8:34
we have a trade relationship across the
8:35
Atlantic that is not without its
8:37
tensions growing tensions at the moment
8:40
growing tensions due to certain
8:42
protectionist tendencies in American
8:43
politics but we normally sort them out
8:47
um the relationship across the Atlantic
8:49
uh we are allies whatever that means but
8:52
that doesn't mean that we are 100 of the
8:54
same view all the time never been the
8:57
case uh not now either and and of course
9:00
the difference I would say the the
9:02
fundamental difference between the
9:03
European View
9:04
an American view on China is that
9:07
for the U.S correct me if you think I'm
9:10
exaggerating
9:12
but for the U.S it's a fear of what I
9:14
call 1870
9:17
um 1870 was when
9:20
U.S replaced Britain as the dominating
9:23
power in the world in terms of economy
9:25
and there was consequences coming out of
9:28
that and and Americans of course feared
9:31
that an increasingly economically
9:33
powerful China
9:35
will over time
9:37
replace the Americans replace U.S as the
9:40
dominant power in the world I think
9:41
that's grossfully exaggerated I don't
9:44
think it will happen
9:46
but there's no question that that is
9:47
driving a lot of the fears in American
9:49
politics yeah but you know I think that
9:53
you are right that that is the great
9:56
fear that they will the Chinese will
9:58
overtake us the United States and I also
10:01
agree that it is probably greatly
10:04
exaggerated but this gets to my earlier
10:07
point that you never want to
10:09
underestimate the extent to which great
10:13
Powers assume worst case assumptions or
10:16
make worst case assumptions about the
10:19
other side so when you bring NATO
10:23
up to Russia's borders even if there are
10:26
no military forces American military
10:28
forces on Ukraine's territory and even
10:31
if it's going to take a long time for
10:34
Ukraine to become a member of NATO from
10:37
a Russian point of view they assume
10:39
worst case and they get really scared
10:41
because it's a security issue and the
10:43
same thing is true with the Americans
10:45
looking at China the Americans are
10:47
scared stiff
10:49
she pointed out that China is going to
10:51
overtake them and great powers are just
10:55
they get very nervous they get very
10:59
antsy and then they pursue risky
11:02
strategies that's the point I've tried
11:03
to drive home yet I mean
11:06
not quite the same thing but I'm in
11:08
Norway as a border with Russia Norwegian
11:11
Force which is very close to more months
11:13
which is the most yes density's
11:15
concentration of nuclear military power
11:17
that's been fairly okay uh since the
11:21
1940s I don't think the Russians were
11:23
particularly happy about Russia about
11:24
Norway joining NATO they were not but
11:27
his work Estonia is a member of NATO
11:31
um that is very close to Saint
11:32
Petersburg I mean the the Border City of
11:35
narva is closer to Saint Peters than to
11:37
Talib
11:39
um they live fairly harmoniously
11:40
together that is not a threat it works
11:44
but don't you see uh geopolitics leading
11:47
to an escalation of tensions in the
11:50
Arctic and in the north doesn't the fact
11:53
that the Cold War was a bipolar
11:56
situation that was relatively stable we
12:00
are now in a situation that is fairly
12:02
unstable because we do not know exactly
12:04
where we are heading and we have major
12:06
states that are uncertain about the
12:08
capabilities and the intentions of the
12:10
others and that brings us into a very
12:12
dangerous territory
12:14
it does but but but but the Arctic is
12:17
essentially not another thing and that
12:19
is of course the fact that the ice is
12:21
receding
12:22
and that means that for example now if
12:25
you want to go with north of Siberia you
12:29
can't go without the help of the
12:30
Russians simply not doable
12:33
um
12:35
20 30 years down the road 40 50 years
12:37
down the road you might have a lot of
12:40
commercial traffic going to the north of
12:41
Siberia and that will invite a lot of
12:44
legal and political issues be that
12:46
rivalry a bit something else I don't
12:49
think war is going to break out in the
12:50
Arctic but we're going to face a number
12:52
of new questions primarily as a result
12:55
of climate change I would argue but that
12:58
is also more urgent because we have
13:00
climate cooperation among the major
13:02
Nations how does the geopolitical
13:04
Rivalry influence our ability to move
13:09
forward and climate if you look at what
13:11
has happened over the past 10 months
13:12
they didn't it didn't vary
13:15
optimistic would you say
13:17
no I wouldn't although
13:19
Russia was never a big play on global
13:23
climate they should have been because
13:25
they're going to be performantly
13:26
affected by it and it takes them a long
13:27
time to understand that that's going to
13:30
be the case China is a was the big one
13:33
India to a certain extent we have I
13:36
think is 28 to 29 of global emissions
13:40
all from China and even if they are
13:42
leaders in Lord of the Renewables and
13:45
other things now they're also the
13:47
leaders in Coal emissions which is the
13:49
most dangerous thing so um one of the
13:51
good things that came out of the meeting
13:52
between Biden XI Xin ping in Bali was
13:56
that they restarted
13:58
the climate dialogue and the president
14:01
of the European Council is invading
14:02
today
14:04
in order to discuss primarily we start
14:07
in the climate dialogue with the Chinese
14:10
Russia different thing but we know that
14:13
war is a very very
14:16
detrimental activity for climate and for
14:20
uh focus on climate issues the emissions
14:23
in Europe have certainly taken a
14:25
different uh Road and so has the
14:28
situation with coal in Asia and so forth
14:30
so this is having very detrimental
14:32
effects both on emissions but also on
14:35
the economies that we need to turn it
14:37
around so there are certainly some very
14:39
unfortunate consequences for for for
14:42
climate in the short to midterm
14:46
I think to get in agreement on climate
14:50
uh and to get agreements on how to deal
14:54
with pandemics and to get arms control
14:57
agreements unique cooperation among the
15:01
great powers in the system the most
15:03
powerful states
15:05
as we remember we shut down
15:09
proliferation in the second half of the
15:11
Cold War because the United States and
15:14
the Soviet Union decided to create the
15:16
npt the nuclear suppliers group and so
15:19
forth and so on the great Powers have to
15:22
cooperate there's no question about that
15:25
the problem that we face today is
15:27
twofold first of all they're not two
15:30
great powers in the system like there
15:33
were during the Cold War there's not one
15:35
great power which is really the ideal
15:37
situation like there was in the unipolar
15:40
moment there are three great powers
15:43
second problem is
15:45
a young woman named Eliza George who
15:48
wrote
15:49
article on proliferation during the Cold
15:53
War and her argument is the more intense
15:57
the security competition between great
16:00
Powers the less likely it is you'll get
16:04
cooperation on proliferation and
16:07
assorted issues because the great Powers
16:11
really don't want to cooperate they want
16:13
to contest each other and she shows that
16:16
you got very little
16:18
cooperation between the United States
16:20
and the Soviet Union on the nuclear
16:22
proliferation front in the Hat first
16:25
half of the Cold War it was with the
16:27
coming of day taunt where you've got
16:29
cooperation between more cooperation
16:31
between the United States and the
16:32
Soviets that led to cooperation on the
16:36
proliferation front anyway all this is
16:39
to say when you look at the fact that we
16:41
have three great powers that you have to
16:43
coordinate and that you have an intense
16:45
security competition in East Asia
16:48
between the United States and China you
16:50
have an intense security competition
16:52
almost a war between the United States
16:54
and Russia and Europe it's no accident
16:57
ladies and gentlemen the Xi Jinping
17:00
recently told John Kerry that he was not
17:03
interested in cooperating on climate and
17:07
it's no accident that the Russians have
17:10
just made it clear that they're not that
17:12
interested in cooperating on arms
17:14
control with the United States so I
17:16
think we're going to have a lot of
17:18
trouble
17:19
garnering copyright cooperation on this
17:23
set of issues moving forward because of
17:25
the change in the structure of the
17:27
system moving to multi-polarity and the
17:29
intensity the Cooper of the competition