个人资料
正文

顶尖华裔美国科学家要么已经离开 要么正在考虑离开

(2022-02-12 08:10:23) 下一个

华裔科学家在美遭无端指控后的哀叹:你努力工作,却被美国当间谍对待!

来源:环球时报  2022-02-12

英国《卫报》2月10日文章,原题:“你被当作间谍对待”:美国因开展“中国行动计划”被指控进行种族歧视  

2015年5月21日早7时前,费城天普大学的物理学教授郗小星被猛拍家门的人惊醒。十几名荷枪实弹的联邦调查局(FBI)特工闯进他家里……郗在家人面前被戴上手铐并被捕。他被控什么罪?所谓向他的出生地中国传递美国敏感技术而涉嫌犯有电信欺诈罪。他被捕4个月后,该案尚未开庭就被撤诉。本周,在那次搜捕行动过去近7年后,64岁的郗向费城一家法院起诉,要求重审他对美国政府和FBI发起的损害赔偿诉讼。这并非他首次向美国政府讨说法。去年,另一家法院驳回他的要求以及他对FBI行动具有“歧视性”的指控。

郗遭受的磨难发生在奥巴马政府时期,但他最近尝试获得赔偿的努力,恰逢华盛顿正就美国应如何与中国竞争展开广泛争论。随着更多美国尤其是华裔科学家被卷入美中地缘政治紧张局势,与他类似的遭遇激增。

特朗普政府2018年发起“中国行动计划”,以对抗“中国威胁”。上周,FBI局长克里斯托弗·雷声称,“没有任何国家比中国对我们的信念、创新和经济安全构成更广泛的威胁”。他宣称FBI大约每天两次启动一项针对中国的反情报调查。

反对“中国行动计划”的人士表示,在那些曾经或现在仍与中国保持联系的美国学者中,该行动催生出一种无处不在的恐惧情绪,而这些学者曾被视为连接美中的桥梁。美国国会首位华裔女议员赵美心认为,这项行动是执行“种族定性”的工具。(美政府)已把它变成一种恐吓华裔科学家和工程师的手段。

在中国出生的哈佛大学学者锁志刚认为,这种充满敌意的氛围正对美国产生不利影响,“过去鲜有华裔美国人考虑离开美国。但如今我可以告诉你,一些顶尖华裔美国科学家要么已经离开要么正在考虑离开”。定居美国30年来的大部分时间里,他对政治都不感兴趣。但去年1月他最好的朋友、另一位华裔美国科学家陈刚被捕,改变了这种状况。

陈是在中国出生的麻省理工学院机械工程师,他被指隐瞒与中国的关系,但相关指控后来被撤销。“在(美国实施‘中国行动计划’)前,你在被证明有罪之前是清白无辜的。如今,你在证明自己清白无辜以前都是有罪的”,锁说,“我担心这是美国人才缓慢流失的开始。从历史上看,大国衰落始于人才流失”。已获释的陈最近表示,“你努力工作,成就斐然,建立声誉……但到头来却被(美政府)当成间谍对待”。

彭博社去年12月的分析显示,自启动“中国行动计划”以来公布的50个指控中,仅有20%的案件涉及经济间谍活动,且其中大部分仍未得到解决。(作者文森特·倪,丁玎译)

又一顶尖科学家离开美国!美科技界炸锅:他回中国了

2022-01-27 09:14:33 来源: 大卫的迷你模型
 
大家都知道,现在人们生活的方方面面都离不开电,电能源也是科学家们一直突破的点,此前,潘锦功发现的发电玻璃,直接被美国认为是未来国家能源技术,于是潘锦功也因此被列为重点保护对象了。要知道,当时的潘锦功才20多岁,就已经在新泽西理工大学创建一家名为“发电玻璃”的研究中心。

但是让美国意想不到的是,这个世界顶尖级别的科学家根本不被高薪优待所诱惑,一心只想要回国效力,于是美科技界炸锅了:他回中国了!潘锦功也没有辜负大众对于他的期望,历时6年,世界最大的单体面积发电玻璃首次面世了。

可能大家对于发电玻璃有些陌生,其学名为碲化镉薄膜太阳能电池,被行内人士称为“挂在墙上的油田”。是一种可再生新能源材料,是非常环保的,不仅可以改变人们的生活方式,还可改善人们对于世界对于环境的破坏。

值得一提的是,这不仅仅是世界上最大的单体发电玻璃,还是中国拥有的完全自主知识产权的高科技玻璃,据了解,这样的一块发电玻璃一年可以供应260度电,现在的福特汽车厂房和墙壁都已经用上了这块黑科技玻璃,就连印度都表示,希望中国能够共享这项技术,造福全人类。

'You're treated like a spy': US accused of racial profiling over China Initiative

 China affairs correspondent

Trump programme to ‘counter Chinese national security threats’ continues to spread fear among academics with links to China

 

China and US flags overlapping

The China Initiative has ‘drifted and, in some significant ways, lost its focus’, according to a former Department of Justice official.

 

It was sometime before 7am on 21 May 2015 when Xiaoxing Xi, a physics professor at Temple University in Philadelphia, was woken by people pounding on his front door. Still not fully dressed, he opened the door to be confronted by about 12 armed FBI agents.

The agents burst into Xi’s house, running about, shouting “FBI, FBI”. They pointed their guns at his wife and two daughters and ordered them to walk out of their bedrooms with their hands raised. Xi was handcuffed and arrested in front of his family.

His alleged crime? Four counts of wire fraud for passing sensitive US technology to China, the country of his birth. “Overnight, I was painted as a Chinese spy all over the news and internet and faced the possibility of up to 80 years in prison and a $1m fine,” he wrote in a statement to the US House of Representatives last year.

Four months after his arrest, the case collapsed before reaching trial. Xi, who came to the US from China in 1989 at the age of 32, was told through his lawyer that the US justice department (DoJ) had dismissed the case after “new information came to the attention of the government”.

 

Xiaoxing Xi, chair of the physics department at Temple University in Philadelphia.

Xiaoxing Xi, chair of the physics department at Temple University in Philadelphia, is claiming damages against the US government. Photograph: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty

On Monday, nearly seven years after that raid, Xi, 64, asked a federal appeals court in Philadelphia to reinstate his claims for damages against the US government and the FBI. He and his family claim that they had been “wrongly” investigated and prosecuted in 2015.

The Xi family also wants a declaration that the FBI violated their fourth and fifth amendment rights. They say they have “clear evidence” the FBI violated their constitutional rights, and that years later they are still dealing with the trauma of the ordeal.

“If we can’t hold the government accountable now, there will be little to stop the government from profiling other Asian American scientists and ruining more innocent people’s lives in the future,” Xi said. “The government is not entitled to do what they have done to me and my family.”

This is not Xi’s first attempt to take on the US government. Last April, a lower court dismissed nine of his 10 claims, which included allegations the FBI knowingly made false statement. The court also rejected his claim that the FBI’s action was “discriminatory”.

But the lower court has yet to rule on Xi’s 10th claim, which challenges the US government’s surveillance of Xi and his family. The DOJ declined to comment on the lawsuit. The FBI has been contacted by the Guardian for comment on the Xi case.

Xi’s ordeal occurred under the Obama administration, but his latest attempt to secure compensation comes amid a wide-ranging debate in Washington about how the US should compete with China. Stories like Xi’s have also been emerging as more American scientists – in particular those of Chinese origin – are being caught up in the geopolitical tensions.

In 2018, the Trump administration launched a China Initiative to “[reflect] the strategic priority of countering Chinese national security threats and reinforce the president’s overall national security strategy”. The DoJ website boasts a series of examples – the latest, from 5 November, detailing an alleged attempt by a Chinese intelligence officer to steal trade secrets.

Last week, the FBI’s director, Christopher Wray, alleged “there is just no country that presents a broader threat to our ideas, our innovation, and our economic security than China”. He claimed his bureau opens a counterintelligence case against China “about twice a day”.

Opponents of the China Initiative argue it creates a pervasive atmosphere of fear among American academics who used to, or still have, links to China. Until recently, they were seen by many as a bridge between the two nations.

 

Congresswoman Judy Chu

Congresswoman Judy Chu says the US government has turned the China Initiative into an instrument for ‘racial profiling’. Photograph: Rex/Shutterstock

Judy Chu, a California Democrat and the first Chinese American woman in US Congress, said the China Initiative is an instrument for “racial profiling”. “[The government] has turned it into a means to terrorise Chinese scientists and engineers. Something has gone dramatically wrong,” she told US media in December.

Responding to concerns, the attorney general, Merrick Garland, said to Congress in October that the DoJ would review the programme. Opposition to the initiative has grown louder in recent months. In December one former DoJ official said it had “drifted and, in some significant ways, lost its focus”.

In a statement to the Guardian, a DOJ spokesperson said: “Consistent with the Attorney General’s direction, the Department is reviewing our approach to countering threats posed by the PRC government. We anticipate completing the review and providing additional information in the coming weeks.”

Zhigang Suo, a Chinese-born Harvard academic who, like Xi, is also a naturalised US citizen, said the heated atmosphere was having an adverse affect. “Of course people are upset about China, but I can see it takes two people to bicker. And I’m not a fan of the juvenile behaviour on either side,” he said. “In the past, very few fellow Chinese Americans would even think of leaving the US. But now, I can tell you some of the top Chinese American scientists have either left or are thinking about leaving.”

For most of the three decades since settling in the US, Suo was not interested in politics. “My wife is a political junkie, but I wasn’t interested in it at all,” he said. But on 14 January 2021, the arrest of his best friend, Gang Chen, a fellow Chinese American scientist, changed that.

 

Gang Chen, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Gang Chen, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Photograph: Wen Zeng/MIT/via Reuters

Chen, a Chinese-born mechanical engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was charged with hiding his links to China. The charges were later dismissed, but the incident turned Suo from an apolitical science nerd into a political activist.

“Before [the China Initiative], you were innocent until proven guilty. Now, you are guilty until you prove you are innocent,” Suo said. “I fear this is the start of a slow process of brain drain for America. Historically, brain drain precedes the decline of great nations.”

In a recent interview with the New York Times, Chen, who has now been released, said: “You work hard, you have good output, you build a reputation … The government gets what they want, right? But in the end, you’re treated like a spy. That just breaks your heart. It breaks your confidence.”

Supporters of the China Initiative argue that this China-focused programme is not completely without merit. They point to the recent case of a Harvard chemistry professor, Charles Lieber, who, in December,was found guilty of six felony counts, including failure to disclose his associations and funding from a China-based university and the country’s controversial talent programme.

But that same month, a Bloomberg analysis showed that among 50 indictments announced or unsealed since the programme’s inception, “only 20% of the cases allege economic espionage, and most of those are unresolved. Just three claim that secrets were handed over to Chinese agents.”

Xi said the nightmare experience seven years ago interrupted his “American dream”. Although the charges were quickly dropped and his university position reinstated, his career has been damaged nevertheless, he said. “My research programme is now much smaller… I’m scared of applying for funding because as long as I do anything imperfectly, it could one day come back to haunt me.”

Yet, despite the ordeal, Xi said he had also learned an important lesson. “If we – Americans of Chinese descent – want our environment improved, we need to speak out and fight for our rights. This is how democracy operates.”

[ 打印 ]
阅读 ()评论 (0)
评论
目前还没有任何评论
登录后才可评论.