2017 (112)
2018 (153)
2019 (199)
2020 (147)
2021 (199)
2022 (166)
2023 (96)
去年由民主党背后操盘，黑人充当炮灰的殃及全美国的打砸抢烧的黑命贵运动，导致美国警察队伍被妖魔化，Law and Order变成了白人至上的代名词。结果可想而知，拜登的民主党政府上台后，美国的犯罪率飙升，而一向遵纪守法逆来顺受的华裔与亚裔，更成了黑命贵抢劫与杀戮的对象。。。
在加州一手遮天的民主党政客们，为了黑穆西的选票，为了讨好黑穆西，更是变本加厉，悍然推出47号提案，简直是到了丧心病狂的地步！
这个最近闹得沸沸扬扬，在加州华人中激起公粪的47 号提案，用一句话概括，就是：
抢劫偷盗$950以下，不用蹲监狱
加州的犯罪分子们可谓喜大普奔，而普通老百姓则惶惶不可终日。最可怜的，当属small business owners。一方面，遇受疫情的沉重打击，成千上万的小商店小企业纷纷倒闭。另一方面，那些在疫情打击下勉强存活，拼命维持生计的小企业主小店主们，还要遭受不做不死的民主党政客的双重打击：47号提案！这个提案给了黑穆西光天化日之下随意偷盗抢劫的自由。只要金额不超过$950，就不用蹲监狱。换句话说，既使被抓获，也会立马释放。
加州被逼得走投无路的小店主，只能把店里每一个商品的价格都定为$951…
一人一票的民主政治被权欲熏心的民主党玩儿成这屌样，美国的悲哀啊
做为美国华人，希望大家能够花上一分钟。。。。
sign this petition to STOP prop 47 !!!!
TO: The California State House, The California State Senate, and Governor Gavin Newsom
REPEAL PROP 47
https://sign.moveon.org/petitions/repeal-prop-47-1?share=5b30e768-d7ae-4cd7-9e4c-8f94ee20b504&source=email-share-button&utm_medium=&utm_source=email
(1): 在加州，偷盗$950以下是有刑期的 （up to six months in county jail）: 在黑命贵运动的淫威下，有刑期有用吗？黑穆西犯法，敢抓吗？即使抓了，还不是立马放出来
(2): Prop 47 2014年通过时，在民主党共和党都有人支持的：2014年的时候，美国的种族矛盾有这麽严重吗？欧巴马的族裔政治，是美国现在如此撕裂的元凶
(3): 加州的财产犯罪从Prop 47 在2014年通过以来一直是下降的。（比起2000年来，下降了32%）：奉劝您去查一查黑命贵运动之后的犯罪率，看看是增加了，还是减少了。
俺引用的是数据，是专业机构（不止一个）研究调查了整体性，宏观的大局 － 加州全州长期性的驱势 － 得到的结果。
您引用的是一个人在网路 Moveon.org 上贴的她自己＂感觉＂，没有严谨的数字或政策分析。只是片面的，个人性的，道听途说的宣称。这个＂宣称＂和＂现实＂（reality) 有着很大的距离。
俺还是要再说一次：
(1): 在加州，偷盗$950以下是有刑期的 （up to six months in county jail）。
(2): Prop 47 2014年通过时，在民主党共和党都有人支持的。
(3): 加州的财产犯罪从Prop 47 在2014年通过以来一直是下降的。（比起2000年来，下降了32%）。
还有一点：
美国的中文网上到处是谣言假消息，很多四处散播的＂据说＂＂有人说＂在没有确切的核实前不可轻信。
但是这个轻罪并不轻，每个区段都有相应的惩罚标准
所以最关键的执法，加州这个轻罪也有上限到六个月的惩罚
但是加州的实际情况是，抓了就放，所以问题的实质是加州的检察机关
不予以起诉，警察也就抓了就放了。
“五个海盗如何分享100个金币？一号海盗给自己留下97个，给2号0个，给3号1个，给四号或五号2个。
海盗分金的这个故事，其实就是人类历史上不断重演的阶层利益分配的寓言。在人类历史上，一个有趣的现象是：阶层矛盾的爆发形式，往往不是上层和下层之间的简单二元对立，而是最上层与最下层会合起伙来，与中层对抗。
美国民主党在欧巴马之后开始玩所谓“身份政治”。而“身份政治”的思路就是要给每个族群都贴上标签：你是非洲裔、你是墨裔、你是亚裔、你是女权、你是LGBT……最后给这些代表组一个大联盟。说我们要平权啊，要反歧视啊。垄断巨头和“精英”控制的主流媒体天天喊。
而所有这一切安排的最终目的，是为了垄断巨头和被他们所操弄的政客们能够扮演那个“一号海盗”：为了这场“民主”的投票能通过，他们献祭了一部分人，安抚了另一部分人，而后就可以心安理得的拿走几乎所有金币了。
美国的种族问题，不是种族问题，而是社会阶层问题。所谓“种族平权””身份政治“，其实不过是一场被包装美化了的海盗分金计划。是美国上层煽动的，一群人对另一群人的合法抢劫。”
Police officers are arresting the same individuals over and over again since they are able to generally get back on the street the same night for drug offenses and property crimes under $950. Criminals using dangerous drugs such as methamphetamines and heroin now face little or no repercussions from law enforcement officers. Unfortunately these same criminals that use drugs and commit "petty theft" crimes are the same criminals that commit violent acts and home burglaries.
It's no coincidence that since the passing of passing of AB109 and Prop 47 almost all of the LAPD's 21 divisions have seen an increase in "Part 1" crimes. Shootings alone have increased by a whopping 30% citywide. And I would bet that these career criminals are the reason behind a 300% increase in petty theft in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes alone.
This was posted by a LAPD Senior Lead Officer who patrols skid row:
Prop 47... I hate to say I told you so but:
Over the last several years I have witnessed so much irresponsibility from people we seek leadership from. We have chosen idealism over our safety. We have chosen to be test subjects in social experiments over common sense.
We fall for titles at the ballot box, instead of weighing the realities of human nature.
For example. Prop 47 was dubbed the "Safe neighborhoods and schools act". Put that on any ballot and most people will vote for it without thinking.
But can anyone tell me how releasing inmates who could care less about your safety or property with no jobs, and no real mandate to get rehabilitated into the streets is supposed to make neighborhoods and schools safe?
The measure did exactly what I thought it would. Put neighborhoods and schools in these neighborhoods in danger. Crime is up all over this state.
Here is the thing. I would have voted for 47 if the mechanisms were in place when they got out to house, employ, and educate them. Instead and as always, they released them first and said "Oh we will fix it later".
I actually agree with making mere possession a misdemeanor, but a misdemeanor with some teeth at least. But I am seeing drug dealers qualifying for 47, as courts are finding loopholes to help get felony drug sales charges reduced.
There is zero incentive now for addicts or dealers to stop their crimes or seek help. Drug usage and dealing are not victimless crimes as the people who created the laws would have you believe.
Dysfunctional users will resort to violence and property crimes to support their habits. Drug dealers use violence as a means to control their operation, protect territories, and intimidate communities from trying to stop them.
This has always been the case, but somehow we still voted for this flawed law as if these criminals would magically stop committing crimes if we released them and just slapped them on the wrist enough times until they get tired of getting their wrist slapped.
Prop 47 and AB109 was not about saving money at all. It was simply a political movement that was packaged in a certain way to get you to vote for it and it worked. It prayed on your heart by using the usual tactics of "saving kids" and "Giving people chances" But what they really have done is place kids and adults in danger to satisfy a world view.
This must be reversed. I'm not against giving people second chances. If you know me, you know that's what I am all about. But with every noble concept, you must use your head and common sense to get it done.
The safety of the people of this state should never be sacrificed or be a part of some idealistic experiment.
I do hope some of the people being released turn their lives around. But based on what I have seen in 20 years of police work, many career criminals won't stop because they chose criminality as a career.
The community within the City of Los Angeles and other communities within California are not going to stand for it. We ask our state legislators to address the repercussions of both of these laws and work with both the community and law enforcement to make modifications necessary to keep criminals off our streets. Reverse the effects of Prop 47 and AB109 now!
（１）： ＂抢劫偷盗$950以下，不用蹲监狱＂
那有这种事情了？$950以下是 misdemeanor 没错，可不是无罪。刑期是：up to six months in county jail, 罚款no more than $1,000。
不信的话可以去抢个$949看看，如果被抓本人一概不负责。
（２）：Prop 47 是2014年通过的。那时候是民党共党都有支持者。
着名的推手之一，有名的共和党人士 － 前共和党国会议长和川粉Newt Gingrich 先生，他当初鼓吹大家投赞成票的文章还在呢！看看：
＂Californians should take advantage of the opportunity and vote yes on Proposition 47.＂
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0917-gingrich-prop--47-criminal-justice-20140917-story.html
（３）： 加州的财产犯罪从Prop 47 在2014年通过以来一直是下降的。
是下降的。
是下降的。
（要说三遍）。
研究显示：加州在2020年的property crime下降了９%。
比起2000年，整体下降了32%。（全美国也是下降的）
＂California’s 9% drop in the property crime rate in 2020 is just slightly greater than the nationwide decline of 8%. While California’s property crime rate is now significantly below what it was in 2000, down by 32%, this is less than the nationwide drop of about 50%. ＂
（见：https://www.ppic.org/blog/recent-state-crime-trends-mostly-mirror-the-nation/）
还：UC Irvine犯罪学教授研究比较了犯罪数据，发现Proposition 47根本没有增加犯罪。研究如下：
（见：https://thecrimereport.org/2018/03/09/cas-proposition-47-didnt-cause-crime-rise-study/ ）
我认为根本问题是贫富不均，加上黑人的种族劣性（黑人认为错都是奴隶制造成的，自己没有问题，没钱就去抢，合理的），就造成这今天的局面。
没有办法解决，只能顺其自然，让局势更烂一些，这样加州人才能再次公投，把烂人关在监狱里面。 这也意味着高税收。（警察的费用可不便宜）
因为天气和社会收入高钱多的因素，全美国的homeless都往加州跑，等于全美国的轻罪可能的罪犯多数在加州。
加州曾经有过美国最严厉的针对他们的规定（不许在大街上给他们钱，就是如今这个民主党州长规定的），但照样无法阻止他们来加州，你在美国其他什么地方能找到这种天气和人们的慷慨？
这个公投其实就是把过去的500美元提高到950美元，但过去鲜有人知道500美元的事情，如今950被炒作到尽人皆知，墨菲定律怎么说来着？
即使要废除这个法律，最大可能也只能采取公投方式，那么为什么至今也没有人发起？难道加州没有共和党？这才是值得才探讨的。
不是生活在加州的人是理解不了加州的事情的，因为加州与美国任何其他州都不同。而一个历史现象可以说明这种不同的结局，凡是在加州流行的，不论是事情还是观念，大致在十五年左右会在全美国流行。
许多州都有1000美元以下的是轻罪的规定，只是加州把它定为法律了。
------------------
根本区别在于，其他州（如德州）会认真执法。左州不仅定为法律，而且在执行中放任。不抓或者抓了就放。这才是关键。