个人资料
归档
正文

重回天安门之 六四学生领袖 历史真正的罪人

(2014-05-26 01:04:12) 下一个

当年六四,学生和大众的动机是很正义、很正当、很纯净的,就是中国要发展民主,要遏制腐败,这是最大多数中国民众的诉求,所以,一呼百应,转眼间就发展得轰轰烈烈、唤起全国各地各界积极响应。

当时赵紫阳去了广场和学生领袖对话,从中国的历史和国情看,这已经是一个很大的进步了。为什么当时这些学生领袖们不选择让步?我认为,他们就是认为自己已经获得了那么大的支持力量,足以逼迫国家机器就范,国家机器不敢拿他们怎么样。说到底,就是绑架支持者作为人质,和国家机器谈判。

当事态进一步发展以后,当局已经明确表示会武力控制局势,会不惜一切代价平息示威活动,学生领袖们在干什么呢?他们自己却开始准备跑路,这个时候他们全然没有站出来和支持者在一起,甚至用自己的身体和生命去保护那些支持者。为什么他们是选择了让其他追随者牺牲,而自己却在西方、拿着反华经费过着舒适逍遥的生活,到处情绪激昂的演讲,到处拿博士学位招摇过市?他们有什么脸站在那些亡者的遗像前?他们在危难关头没有丁点责任感。为了保全自己,他们不惜牺牲任何人,甚至用别人的生命去换取自己的生活、名利、地位。中国的发展壮大,真能依靠这样的精英吗?看看这些年他们在海外都干了些什么??除了不断的谩骂、叫嚣、鼓噪反华反共,没有一丁点真正的为这个国家和民族、人民做过一件有益的事情。甚至是一些无耻的事情。大家可以自己看,我都懒得数。

当时的学生领袖们和他们背后的恶意反华势力才是真正的罪人,而且应该是最大的罪人。是他们明知不可为而极力为之,导致那么多人失去生命。撕了被绑架的学生和民众的肉票。就好比,他被持刀歹徒追杀过程中,明知自己不妥协,歹徒就会杀人,他却绑架同情帮助他的人们去抵挡歹徒的刀枪,自己却乘机逃生。如果不是他绑架这些支持同情者,那些人不会失去生命。如果他们选择适当的让步,我相信歹徒没有必要冒着被判死刑的风险而杀人。难道大家只认为是歹徒才是罪人吗?大家不认为这个召集人也罪大恶极吗? 最无辜的,是一直被这些学生领袖们鼓动着要坚持战斗到最后一分钟的、失去了生命的人们。

我哀悼那些无辜的亡者!相信中国的民主会不断的进步,相信中国和中国人民会不断的富强。他们的血不会白流的。 我谴责那些无耻的所谓民运领袖。他们才是最恶毒的凶手!他们必须为他们自己的所作所为向死难的人们请罪认罪!

[ 打印 ]
阅读 ()评论 (2)
评论
还我河山0604 回复 悄悄话 Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts,but with facts.
caochu 回复 悄悄话 Remembering the Student Democracy movement in 1989, different people may have different opinions about the roles of the students, of the participants, of the government officials, etc.

I remember one comment in Chicago Tribune at the time to characterize student organization during the movement in Beijing. Not the exact words, but to the fact that in the square, facing the forbidden city where the Government located, students had quickly set up the tent city that resembles that in the forbidden city.

I also remember a CNN Interview with Cuban Leader Castro. When asked about the event unfolding in Beijing and pressed on how he would see the student movement, Castro said: "I see a similar crowd of students in Tienanmen Square some thirty years ago...". I heard him referring to the students in Tienanmen Square during the cultural revolution.

Although student leaders had their mistakes (mirroring that of the government in Forbidden City, and not so 'Democratic'), thus responsible in contributing things happened in June, the government at the time should be held responsible for what followed that movement. The government should answer to the people, and answer to that part of Chinese history.
登录后才可评论.