六大犹太传媒公司控制全球96%的媒体
(2014-01-12 09:46:16)
下一个
译:檀乐平shine
一 迪斯尼集团
迪斯尼堪称全球顶级传媒巨头,它的董事会主席兼CEO名叫Michael Eisner,是个犹太人。一位媒体分析家曾说,迪斯尼帝国的老板是一个“控制狂人”。他控制着若干个电视制作公司:沃尔特•迪斯尼电视台、Touchstone电视台、Buena Vista电视台。迪斯尼的电视台拥有1400万付费用户。
在电影方面,迪斯尼影业集团的老板Joe Roth也是犹太人,旗下拥有Touchstone影业、好莱坞影业和Caravan影业。迪斯尼集团还拥有Miramax电影公司,由Weinstein兄弟负责管理。
1984年被Eisner接管之前,迪斯尼集团一直在非犹太人的迪斯尼家族的管理之下,那时候它的形象清新健康,是家庭娱乐的首选。而现在,虽然它依然拥有白雪公主等卡通形象的版权,但风格却日趋色情和暴力。除此之外,迪斯尼集团在美国境内设立了225个分支机构,还部分持有一些欧洲电视公司的股权。
二 美国广播公司(ABC)
ABC集团的有线电视分公司ESPN,其主席兼CEO是Steven Bornstein,犹太人。他的公司同时控股Lifetime电视台和Arts & Entertainment有线传媒公司。ABC无线广播公司在纽约、华盛顿和洛杉矶等主要城市拥有11个AM广播站和10个FM广播站,同时设有3400多个分支机构。尽管以广播公司起家,ABC在出版业亦取得了不俗的成就,1994年在该领域获得了10亿美元的收入。它拥有七家日报社、Fairchild出版公司、Chilton出版公司,以及Diversified出版集团。
三 时代华纳
全球第二大传媒公司时代华纳,其董事会主席兼CEO Gerald Levin是犹太人。时代华纳的分公司HBO是全美最大的付费电视网。华纳音乐是全球最大的唱片公司,旗下有50个品牌,其中最大的就是Danny Goldberg领导的华纳兄弟唱片公司,他和Warnervision(华纳video制作分公司)的老大Stuart Hersch一样,都是犹太人。华纳音乐推广了蕴含暴力的“冈斯特说唱音乐”,通过与环球唱片公司的合作,推广了别具一格的歌词风格,鼓励黑人对白人的暴力行为。
除了有线电视和音乐之外,华纳在电影(华纳兄弟制片厂)和出版方面也颇有成就。华纳出版方面的总编Norman
Pearlstine就是犹太人,他领导着美国最大的杂志出版公司,旗下的杂志包括《时代周刊》、《体育画报》、《人物》和《财富》。
四 CBS(哥伦比亚广播公司)
1985年,一位非犹太人Ted Turner提出收购CBS,此举震惊了美国新闻界。Turner以广告业起家,后来创办了一个新兴的有线电视网络,名字叫作CNN。
尽管Turner的CNN启用了很多犹太高管,Turner本人是一位具有完善自我和坚强性格的杰出领袖,从未有过损害犹太群体利益的行为。但CBS主席William Paley(本姓Palinsky,犹太人)和董事会的一些犹太高管集体认为,Turner是个难以控制的人,他们害怕他将来有可能倒戈相向。Turner的前雇员Daniel Schorr(犹太人)则公开指责前老板曾有厌恶犹太人的情绪。
为了阻止Turner,CBS高层邀请犹太富豪Laurence Tisch充当白骑士,抢先进行善意收购。Laurence Tisch此前已经拥有剧院、旅馆、保险公司、香烟制造等多个产业,现在他又拥有了CBS。他从1986年到1995年一直担任CBS董事长兼CEO,努力将一切反犹舆论消灭于无形之中。
Turner还想做最后的努力,这回阻止他的是时代华纳。时代华纳拥有CBS 20%的股票,在所有重大事务上都有决定权。
五 Viacom
Viacom是美国第三大传媒公司,年收入100亿美元。它的老板是Sumner Redstone,原名Murray Rothstein,犹太人。Viacom为全美最大的三家电视网络制作节目,旗下拥有12个电视台和12个广播电台。Viacom还收购了派拉蒙电影公司,后者的女老板Sherry Lansing也是犹太人。
在出版方面,Viacom拥有Prentice Hall,Simon & Schuster以及Pocket Books三家出版社。它还拥有四千多家Blockbuster音像制品连锁店。
Viacom因其制作的有线电视节目而广受赞誉,包括Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon等等。从1989年开始,MTV,和Nickelodeon就在年轻观众中占据了庞大的市场份额。
犹太人垄断了全美前三位的媒体公司,如果说这里面没有蓄意的成分,那就是自欺欺人了。(注:不大明白作者依据的是哪个排名,根据2009年的最新表单,时代华纳、迪斯尼和Viacom分别排名一、三、四位,排第二的是Vivendi,索尼第六,新闻集团其实排在第七位)
那么,其他的媒体公司情况如何呢?排第四位的是鲁伯特•默多克的新闻集团,默多克不是犹太人,但他的全球电影和电视业务主管Peter Chermin却是的。排第五位的索尼,索尼是一家日本公司,但它的美国分公司老板Michael Schulhof是犹太人,索尼影业的主管Alan Levine也是犹太人。
电影业
那些未被大型集团收购的电视台和电影公司,大部分也处在犹太人控制之下。例如被影评家称为“美国独立电视先锋”的新世界传媒公司,其老板Ronald Perelman就是个犹太人。
最出名的小规模电影公司当推Dreamworks SKG(注:拍了很多好电影的Dreamworks!),它其实是一个彻头彻尾的犹太企业。1994年,唱片业巨头David Geffen,迪斯尼前高管Jeffrey Katzenberg,以及著名导演斯蒂芬•斯皮尔伯格,参照好莱坞大片场的模式建立了这家电影公司——这三个统统都是犹太人!现在Dreamworks不仅拍电影,还拍摄电视剧、动画片,灌录唱片等等,实现了多元化发展。
好莱坞的两家大型制片公司:MCA和Universal(经常看好莱坞大片的朋友应该很熟悉了),属于同一个大型集团Seagram,Seagram的董事长兼CEO名叫Edgar Bronfman Jr.,他不仅是犹太人,还是世界犹太人代表大会的主席。
众所周知,20世纪早期电影刚开始发展时,犹太人就控制了电影业全部的制作和发行渠道,这种情况直到现在也没有改变。根据1995年的统计,迪斯尼、华纳兄弟、索尼影业、派拉蒙(属于Viacom)、Universal(属于Seagram)这五家制作的电影,占据了全球74%的票房。
电视新闻
在电视方面,美国的三大电视网络巨头ABC、CBS和NBC,现在随着传媒界的合并,这三家已经不是完全独立的公司了。当它们彼此独立时,每一家都被犹太人控制着:ABC是Leonard Goldenson,CBS先是William Paley,然后是Lawrence Tisch;NBC先是David Sarnoff,然后是他儿子Robert。在过去的数十年里,这些电视台从高层到普通职员都被犹太人占据着。当它们逐渐合并,融入其他公司之后,这种情况依然没有改变。电视新闻受犹太人的影响仍然极其大。
我们知道,ABC电视台现在已经部分被迪斯尼收购,它的新闻部门里所有的执行制片人都是犹太人,包括:Victor Neufeld(20-20栏目)、Bob Reichbloom(早安美国)、Rick Kaplan(晚间新闻播报)。
CBS最近被西屋电气公司收购了,然而当初Tisch任命的新闻主管Eric Ober仍然大权在握,当然,他是个犹太人。NBC现在被通用电气收购了,它的新闻主管Andrew Lack是犹太人,几位执行制片人(今日新闻的Jeff Zucker、NBC晚间新闻的Jeff Gralnick、国际新闻的Neal Shapiro)也都是犹太人。
Newhouse家族的传媒帝国
日报是最普遍的新闻传播方式,每天美国人要购买6千万份日报(假定人们都会阅读自己买的报纸吧)。这6千万份报纸来自1500家不同的报社,大家可能会觉得,这么多的报社,应该不会都被犹太人控制。但事实并非如此,这1500家报社并不互相独立,彼此的竞争也很少,更不像大家以为的那样代表大众的利益。每个城市甚至每个小镇都有地区性报纸的日子一去不复返了。现在,大部分地区性报纸都被或大或小的公司控制着,离真正的幕后老板几千英里远。据统计,全美只有25%的报纸是独立运营的,其他都属于大型新闻集团。只有少数几家大报社有跨地区采访能力,其他的报纸都依赖于从这几家转载国内和国际新闻。
犹太人Newhouse兄弟(Samuel和Donald)拥有的Newhouse帝国(注,应该是Advance Publications)完美地诠释了美国日报业是多么缺乏竞争,从中我们可以看出犹太人对舆论的控制达到何等程度。Newhouse拥有26家日报社,其中包括美国最重要的几家日报:Cleveland Plain Dealer、the Newark Star-Ledger、以及the New Orleans Times-Picayune。它还拥有最大的图书出版公司Random House及其分支机构(注:我觉得Random House是贝塔斯曼的吧…… 查了一下,Advance 1980年收购的是Random House的美国分公司,然而两者的所有权很混乱,待查)。
Newhouse广播公司拥有12家电视台和87套有线电视网络,包括一些最重要的电视网(注:我记得Newhouse家族好像还部分控股Discovery?)。
杂志和期刊方面,Newhouse旗下的周刊Sunday supplement Parade每周发行2200万份。Newhouse家族的全资公司Conde Nast group总共发行了几十种期刊,包括发行量极大的the New Yorker,Vogue,Madmoiselle,Glamour,Vanity Fair,Bride’s,Gentlemen’s Quarterly,Self,House & Garden等。
Newhouse传媒帝国的建立者是已故的老Samuel Newhouse,他是来自俄国的犹太移民。Newhouse的报纸和杂志发行量很大,他们的主要收入来源于广告,而不是读者。那些大公司做广告的时候,一旦选择了一家刊物就不会轻易更换,Newhouse于是渐渐排挤掉了所有的竞争对手,在传媒界一枝独秀。
三家犹太人的报纸
从20世纪初开始,犹太人就成了美国经济的决定性力量。与此同时,他们也控制了越来越多的美国报纸。非犹太人的报纸难以生存,其中最大的原因就是报纸的主要经济来源是大公司的版面广告,而很多大公司都被犹太人控制。即便是那些非犹太人开办的报纸,在选择报道新闻时也要考虑到犹太人的利益。这就是所谓的拿人钱财,替人消灾。
通过减少竞争,建立垄断,犹太人逐渐控制了美国的舆论,这一点可以从最权威最有影响力的三大报纸体现出来,即《纽约时报》、《华尔街日报》和《华盛顿邮报》。这三家报纸控制着美国的财经和政治舆论导向,影响着其他所有报纸。它们决定了哪些信息算作“新闻”,哪些不算。它们是信息的原始来源,其他报纸都在抄袭它们的文章。——而这三家报纸,都控制在犹太人手中。
《纽约时报》由两位非犹太人在1851年建立,然而他们去世后,1896年,犹太大亨Adolph Ochs收购了这家报纸。现在他的外孙Arthur Ochs Sulzberger,Jr.是《纽约时报》的CEO。执行总编Max Frankel和总编Joseph Lelyveld也都是犹太人。Sulzberger家族还拥有另外的33家报纸(包括《波士顿环球》)、12家杂志、7家电台电视台、1个有线电视网和3家图书出版公司。《纽约时报》新闻社同时向506家其他媒体提供新闻通稿和图片。
《华盛顿邮报》的王牌是它遍布在各大政府机关中的内线,使它总是能得到第一手的非公开信息。跟纽约时报一样,《华盛顿邮报》也由非犹太人建立,它建立于1877年。1933年6月,它在大萧条中破产,犹太银行家Eugene Meyer将之收购。现在经营这家报纸的是Meyer的女儿Katherine Meyer Graham。
《华尔街日报》每日的发行量高达180万份,是美国发行量最大的日报。它隶属于道琼斯公司。道琼斯公司的CEO是Peter Kann,犹太人。他同时兼任《华尔街日报》主管。
Facts of Jewish Media Control Electronic News & Entertainment Media
The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whose chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney Empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as a “control freak”, includes several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television), its own cable network with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies.
As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe Roth (also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers. When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, under Eisner, the company has expanded into the production of graphic sex and violence. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is part owner of several European TV companies.
ABC’s cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein, a Jew. This corporation also has a controlling share of Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment Network cable companies. ABC Radio Network owns eleven AM and ten FM stations, again in major cities such as New York, Washington, Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 affiliates. Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1994. It owns seven daily newspapers, Fairchild Publications, Chilton Publications, and the Diversified Publishing Group. Time Warner, Inc, is the second of the international media leviathans. The chairman of the board and CEO, Gerald Levin, is a Jew. Time Warner’s subsidiary HBO is the country’s largest pay-TV cable network. Warner Music is by far the world’s largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records, headed by Danny Goldberg. Stuart Hersch is president of Warnervision, Warner Music’s video production unit. Goldberg and Hersch are Jews. Warner Music was an early promoter of “gangsta rap.” Through its involvement with Interscope Records, it helped popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence against Whites. In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the production of feature films (Warner Brothers Studio) and publishing. Time Warner’s publishing division (editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country (Time, Sports Illustrated, People, Fortune).
When Ted Turner, a Gentile, made a bid to buy CBS in 1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a number of Jews in key executive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a strong personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley (real name Palinsky, a Jew) and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for Jews. To block Turner’s bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a “friendly” takeover of the company, and from 1986 till 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network have been obstructed by Levin’s Time Warner, which owns nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals. Viacom, Inc, headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein), a Jew, is the third largest megamedia corporation in the country, with revenues of over $10 billion a year.
Viacom, which produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 12 television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Its publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster, and Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores. Viacom’s chief claim to fame, however, is as the world’s largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989, MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the younger television audience. With the top three, and by far the largest, media companies in the hand of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on their part. What about the other big media companies?
Number four on the list is Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns Fox Television and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a Gentile, but Peter Chermin, who heads Murdoch’s film studio and also oversees his TV production, is a Jew. Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation, whose U.S. subsidiary, Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael Schulhof, a Jew. Alan Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures division.
Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as “the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,” is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew. The best known of the smaller media companies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. Dream Works was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music. Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures, are both owned by Seagram Company, Ltd. The president and CEO of Seagram, the liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman Jr., who is also president of the World Jewish Congress.
It is well known that Jews have controlled the production and distribution of films since the inception of the movie industry in the early decades of the 20th century. This is still the case today. Films produced by just the five largest motion picture companies mentioned above-Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (Seagram)-accounted for 74 per cent of the total box-office receipts for the first eight months of 1995. The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer independent entities. While they were independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson, CBS first by William Paley and then by Lawrence Tisch, and NBC first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert.
Over periods of several decades, these networks were staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and the essential Jewishness of network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by other corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains particularly strong. As noted, ABC is part of Eisner’s Disney Company, and the executive producers of ABC’s news programs are all Jews: Victor Neufeld (20-20), Bob Reichbloom (Good Morning America), and Rick Kaplan (World News Tonight). CBS was recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Nevertheless, the man appointed by Lawrence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains president of CBS News, and Ober is a Jew.
At NBC, now owned by General Electric, NBC News president Andrew Lack is a Jew, as are executive producers Jeff Zucker (Today), Jeff Gralnick (NBC Nightly News), and Neal Shapiro (Dateline). The Print Media After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,500 different publications.
One might conclude that the sheer number of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against Jewish control and distortion. However, this is not the case. There is less independence, less competition, and much less representation of our interests than a casual observer would think. The days when most cities and even towns had several independently owned newspapers published by local people with close ties to the community are gone.
Today, most “local” newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large companies controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or ever thousands of miles away. The fact is that only about 25 per cent of the country’s 1,500 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest depend on these few for all of their national and international news.
The Newhouse empire of Jewish brothers Samuel and Donald Newhouse provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among America’s daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 26 daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation’s largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with all its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the country’s largest cable networks; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Madmoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride’s, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group. This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant from Russia. The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in large degree made possible by the fact that newspapers are not supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers. It is advertising revenue–not the small change collected from a newspaper’s readers–that largely pays the editor’s salary and yields the owner’s profit.
Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the beginning of the 20th century, when Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of competing Gentile newspapers–primarily as a result of selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants. Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the tune.
Three Jewish Newspapers
The suppression of competition and the establishment of local monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized the rise of Jewish control over America’s newspapers. The resulting ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples of the nation’s three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. These three, dominating America’s financial and political capitals, are the newspapers which set the trends and the guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn’t, at the national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it, and all three newspapers are in Jewish hands.
The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896 from Jones’s estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper’s current publisher and CEO. The executive editor is Max Frankel, and the managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld. Both of the latter are also Jews. The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe; twelve magazines, including McCall’s and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven radio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.
Of similar national importance is the Washington Post, which, by establishing its “leaks” throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track on news involving the Federal government. The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin. It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in 1905 by John McLean, and later inherited by Edward McLean. In June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier. The Washington Post is now run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer’s daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board chairman of the Washington Post Co. In 1979, she appointed her son Donald publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of president and CEO of the Washington Post Co. The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in newspapers, television, and magazines, most notably the nation’s number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek.
The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday, is the nation’s largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a New York corporation which also publishes 24 other daily newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron’s, among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall Street Journal. Most of New York’s other major newspapers are in no better hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. The New York Daily News is owned by Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm.
Other Mass Media
The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for television, radio, and newspapers.
Consider, for example, newsmagazines. There are only three of any note published in the United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report. Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a susidiary of Time Warner Communications. The CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald Levin, a Jew.
Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post Company, under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.2 million.
U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.3 million, is owned and published by Mortimer Zuckerman, a Jew. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York’s tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in the country.
Among the giant book-publishing conglomerates, the situation is also Jewish. Three of the six largest book publishers in the U.S., according to Publisher’s Weekly, are owned or controlled by Jews. The three are first-place Random House (with its many subsidiaries, including Crown Publishing Group), third-place Simon & Schuster, and sixth-place Time Warner Trade Group (including Warner Books and Little, Brown).
Another publisher of special significance is Western Publishing. Although it ranks only 13th in size among all U.S. publishers, it ranks first among publishers of children’s books, with more than 50 percent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard Snyder, a Jew, who just replaced Richard Bernstein, also a Jew.
The Effect of Jewish Control of the Media
These are the facts of Jewish media control in America. Anyone willing to spend several hours in a large library can verify their accuracy. I hope that these facts are disturbing to you, to say the least. Should any minority be allowed to wield such awesome power? Certainly, not and allowing a people with beliefs such as expressed in the Talmud, to determine what we get to read or watch in effect gives this small minority the power to mold our minds to suit their own Talmudic interests, interests which as we have demonstrated are diametrically opposed to the interests of our people.
By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media, we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by their parents, their schools, or any other influence.
http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/six-jewish-companies-own-96-of-the-worlds-media/
宋鲁郑 NEWHNAD 2013-01-16
由南方某报新年贺词引发的2013年第一起公共事件,再度令新闻自由成为焦点话题。然而,在相当多的海外华人看来,这不过是一个伪命题。就是部分流亡在外的自由派,也持同样的观点。用他们的话讲:根本就没有新闻自由,西方只不过管治的水平更高明,更有欺骗性罢了。
在海外生活的大多数中国人——超越左中右,之所以会对包装成西方核心价值观的新闻自由持如此观点,原因很简单,事实胜于雄辩,再美好的理论,在现实面前都是苍白的。
近期笔者曾到访东欧。东欧在二十多年前和中国几乎同时、但又以不同的方式告别计划经济,被统称为转轨国家。转轨过程中,除俄罗斯外,其他国家都得到西方的巨额经济扶持(东欧人称:赶走了东方的坦克Tank,迎来了西方的银行Bank),而且更重要的是,在自由派看来,它们彻底实行了私有化和全面的民主化,具有先进的制度优势。然而到今天,东欧不仅依然全面落后于西欧,更落后于中国——要知道,当年转轨时,包括俄罗斯在内的东欧国家都远远领先于中国。
放眼东欧,到处是破败的建筑,落后的基础设施,整个社会了无生气。特别是肇始于西方的经济危机袭来,更重创了东欧各国低迷的经济。到现在,东欧全部债务高达1.7万亿美元——可资对照的是,中国是美国最大的债主,外汇储备高达3.3万亿美元,西方和东欧都期待中国能伸一把援助之手。假如借方和贷方制度不同,即使我们不能武断地说贷方的制度一定多么优越,但总不应该得出“借方的制度要优于贷方”的结论吧。
东欧令人失望的经济发展,自然都能从百姓的生活中体现出来。据在此地经营中餐的华人老板称:每天早开门晚关门,却还不够房租水电费,他在这里经营十年竟然赚不到钱,不得不要打道回国了。而其他店铺莫不如此。要知道中国人是全世界最勤劳、最聪明和最能吃苦的民族之一。他们在任何国家无论政治地位如何,整体上都是经济成功者,甚至在东南亚等国都达到了控制国家经济命脉的程度。只是中国人生活状态在东欧尚且如此,普通百姓更可想而知。
东欧唯一和过去不同的是,到处充斥着操着东西南北口音的中国人!在这里旅游(留下印象最深的大概是历史人文景点的年久失修)、购物、美餐,一掷千金。当然,这也使得众多东欧国家的服务行业也不得不说起汉语。显然,究竟东欧之路还是中国之路更成功,中国游客、东欧各国百姓早已得出自己的答案(如果这一幕正好相反,是东欧游客到处充斥在中国,我想答案也同样会一清二楚)。
然而,尽管东欧依然远远落后于西欧,落后于中国,但西方媒体却和二十多年前大为不同。过去,充斥西方媒体的是东欧如何落后于西欧,甚至改革开放刚刚开始,取得成就尚远无法和今天相比的中国,也被西方媒体捧成榜样。但是今天,虽然事实依旧,但却再也难在西方媒体觅到类似的报道。原因很简单,再这样报道下去,岂不是自我否定,自打耳光?更何况,现在东欧人民有了自由,如果西方媒体再这样忽悠下去,引发获得自由的百姓蜂拥而入可怎么受得了?
于是这里就又出现了一个荒诞的现象:过去,西欧积极鼓励没有自由的东欧人奔向西欧——因为他们明白,再鼓励,成功的人也不会很多,但只要有人成功,就可以被用来打击东欧。而现在,西欧已经不需要接纳东欧人来打击东欧了,相反他们第一位的是限制东欧人的到来。当然,西欧不可能再建柏林墙(东德建柏林墙实在愚蠢,一方面使西欧免受低廉劳工潮的冲击,另一方面还给西欧提供了一个打击自己的口实),而是建立了一个无形的“人权墙”:东欧国家要想加入欧盟,实现人员自然流动,其劳工水准必须达到西欧的水平。这恐怕也是东欧经济发展低迷的原因:一个经济远远落后于西欧的东欧,怎么可能有条件实行和西欧一样的劳工标准?
西欧媒体和政策的这些变化,一语以蔽之,其核心只有一个:维护自己的国家利益。当然,在西方建立的以主权国家为基础的国际秩序和体系下,任何国家都是国家利益至上,捍卫本国利益是所有政党、政治人物的首要责任,也是他们合法性的基础(这很值得中国自由派反思,这实际上也是中国自由派一百多年来一直被边缘化的原因之一)。所以,媒体如此表现可以理解,也值得学习和借鉴。但是,西方不能“既当又立”:一方面把媒体当成捍卫国家利益的工具,一方面又打着新闻自由的幌子。
然而,在现实中,西方表现之恶劣,早已突破本人所批评的“既当又立”的底线,说其是中国早已经否定的“文革”的翻版都不为过。这最新的“典范”就是德国之声。
德国之声创立于1953年,以29种语言播出广播节目,以德语、英语和西班牙语播出电视节目。内容上侧重于报道国际时事,介绍德国时事、文化,以及德国和其他国家之间的双边交流。在西方与BBC、美国之音、法国国际广播电台齐名,并列四大主流媒体。还需要指出的是,这四大媒体都一样,其经费来源是政府财政。是标准的官办媒体。
然而,就是这样一个具有官方色彩、全球声誉和国际显赫地位的媒体,却又是怎样践行“新闻自由”呢?
最早揭开黑幕是发生在2008年的张丹红事件。张丹红是德国之声中文部副主任,北京奥运会前夕由于反对德国媒体一边倒地负面报道中国,先被“德国之声”停止播音工作,后被解除该台中文部副主任职务。
张丹红(资料图)
张丹红事件爆发后,“德国之声”台长贝特曼邀请德国资深记者乌里希·维克特进行真相调查。2009年2月4日,维克特拿出了调查结论,认为张丹红的言论不仅没有错误,而且“德国之声”的解职处理也是错误的。张丹红饱受批评而且直接导致她被撤职是因为这样一句话——“中国在过去30年里成功地使4亿人摆脱了绝对贫困,因此中国共产党比世界上任何一支政治力量在实践人权宣言第三条方面的贡献都要大”,但是这句话与德国获奖记者花久志在《中国不是邪恶帝国》那本书里所说的几乎一模一样。
随后,德国官方把德国之声上万份中文报道翻译成德文,加以审查,结果并没有发现所谓的“红色渗透”的内容。2008年12月1日,德国之声的监督机构——德国之声广播委员会驳回了对张丹红以及德国之声的指责,广播委员会全体一致认定,德国之声中文部既没有违反规定,也没有破坏记者原则。
然而,尽管一切的一切都证明了张丹红的清白,却丝毫没有改变她的处境:既没有恢复名誉,更没有恢复工作和职务。事实上,每一个人都明白,她唯一的错误就在于没有歪曲事实,而是坚持了新闻原则,客观报道了中国,而这不符合西方的政治正确,也不符合西方的利益。当然也有一种可能,张丹红长期接受西方“新闻自由”的宣传和灌输,在天天被洗脑的情况下,以致于天真得竟然付诸实践,从而付出惨重的代价。
就在世人还没有从张丹红事件造成的震惊中缓过劲来,另一场更大的风暴又在德国之声肆虐。这次四名受害者是德国之声相当资深的编辑:王凤波(任职九年)、祝红(任职二十三年)、李琦(任职十一年)、王雪丁(任职十二年)。如果说当年的张丹红只不过是被免职的话,这四个人则是被德国之声处以极刑:扫地出门。这对于年龄偏大(如王凤波已经47岁)、很难再找工作的他们而言等于是逼上人生绝路。
当然,这一次德国之声也变得聪明了,或者更加虚伪了,其理由不再是张凡红事件时的政治原因而是经济困难、经费减少而不得不裁员。只是奇怪的是,在把这四位经验丰富的资深编辑辞退之后,却又马上招聘了毫无经验的新手!
于是被开除的王凤波和祝红将“德国之声”告上波恩地方法院,但一再败诉。科隆地区中级劳动法庭的法官甚至在法庭上就公然赤祼祼地声称“只要德国之声怀疑它的员工是共产分子,那么无需证据就可将他们开除”——这里有新闻自由吗?有法治吗?有人权吗?
据各当事人称,他们之所以被处以“扫地出门”的极刑,原因在于他们对“德国之声”在“张丹红事件”后将中文部意识形态化的做法“进行了不屈的抵抗”。
不得不说的是,王凤波他们应该比南方某报的那些所谓评论员要勇敢得多,更站有道德高地。因为他们一旦被开除,在这样的舆论环境下,根本无法得到德国主流社会的理解和同情,生活无着,甚至生存都成了问题。王凤波等当事者在不同的场合和不少德国记者同行及学者谈过德国之声中文部的问题,但是他们当中的大部分人觉得他们说的简直是天方夜谭,在德国不可能发生。相反,很多人话里话外还认为是我们的确有“亲共”的倾向,或者至少不服从领导,爱挑刺闹事儿,是自作自受,导致被开除。而南方某报诸君,则可以凭此资本得到西方的赏识和大力资助,成为全球知名人士,事业和人生反而更上层楼!
那么,德国之声的意识形态化究竟到了什么程度了呢?不妨看看这些受害者的心声:
“我们作为中文部的编辑与雇员,只要还有良知,每天上班都是一种折磨,工作成为一种煎熬。每天,你的良知与正义感都在受到考验:比如,你敢不敢说真话,敢不敢打抱不平,敢不敢不去拍马屁,敢不敢向领导向同事表明自己的不同观点,敢不敢说皇帝其实是在裸着难看的腚,要不要为五斗米折腰,要不要食嗟来之食。”
“说是人性的悲剧,就在于中文部人人自危的诡异气氛下,人性或被扭曲,或被压抑,相互倾轧,落井下石和打小报告成为风气。记得北京奥运开幕那一天,一位在德国之声实习的女学生在办公室看开幕式时泪眼晶莹,跑出办公室,就被政治正确的同事讽刺为‘爱党愤青’。一位编辑同事私下悄悄对我说,她在家里看北京奥运开幕式,数度激动得流泪,但她知道这话可不敢在办公室里公开说。她说,奥运开幕那是一个特殊的时刻,让她想起作为一个小人物,一个中国人的命运的历史沉浮感,与政治根本无关,但在当时的气氛下,看奥运流泪就是政治立场问题。”
面对这一切,他们不得不发出这样的感叹:“在民主与言论自由的德国,而且还是以批判中国独裁和新闻检查为己任的德国之声,一个宣扬普世价值的公法媒体,竟然对身边的工作人员就来一场堪比中国文革的整风运动,人人自危的站队运动,压制不同意见的清洗运动。麦卡锡主义者1950年代的《赤色频道:共产党在广播电视中的影响的报告》,仿佛又有了新的德国版本。”
不仅如此,德国之声将他们开除后,一位高层领导还公然威胁“离开德国之声后不要乱说”。
正是在海外的华人看到了西方“新闻自由”宣传背后的真相,才会不约而同地得出这样的结论:“根本就没有新闻自由,西方只不过管治的水平更高明,更有欺骗性罢了。”也正是这个原因,也才对国内的新闻管理制度持理解的立场(当然批评也有,比如为什么不尽快学一学西方这样高的管理水平),也才对国内的自由派既觉其可怜,又觉其可悲。
所以,只有当我们了解了西方所谓新闻自由的真相之后才会明白,何以南方这样一个在影响力、知名度远逊于德国之声的周报,发生的不过是修改新年贺词如此之小的事情,竟然能够成为全球——主要是西方媒体——的焦点重要新闻。
至于今天德国之声中文部留下来的记者、编辑们究竟是何种水平,不妨举我本人的亲身经历。也就是在几个月前,我偶遇一位德国之声的记者,才争论几句,她就问了我一个低级的超出我想像的问题:“宋先生如此批评西方,为何还留在西方?”。显然,她的逻辑是,你在哪里,你就应该爱哪里。并用此逻辑来反驳我的观点。当然,我本人是不会问中国的自由派同样的问题的。
从人类的发展历史来看,随着经济、社会和科技的进步,任何一个国家都会越来越透明,越来越自由。这是一个普遍的规律。至于透明和自由到什么程度,则取决于一个国家的发展阶段、文化传统、国际环境等具体内外国情。这才是新闻自由的真义。至于西方和它们的制度捆绑在一起的“新闻自由”则是对真正新闻自由的歪曲和利用,实际上反而消灭了真正的新闻自由。应该说,这个道理,在全球化、信息化的今天,类似于南方某报等的精英们,是不难明白的。不过,假如他们真的就是不明白,就只能期待德国之声们来唤醒他们了。
最后,不妨重复一下德国这个民主国家、法治国家、人权国家法官的公然立场做为本文的结尾吧:
“只要德国之声怀疑它的员工是共产分子,那么无需证据就可将他们开除。”