tjkcb notes: English came with special nouns for specific terms; however, Chinese came in separated, single-word, of confusing. 

Discussing the perspectives of the philosophers Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Friedrich Schelling on Chinese culture and philosophy should combine the spatiotemporal context; however, it could mislead. It is important to note that the views expressed in the text represent the interpretations and opinions of these philosophers and may not reflect a comprehensive or accurate understanding of Chinese culture. Some of the key points highlighted in the text include:

Hegel's perspective on China as an ancient country with a long-standing authoritarian monarchy and a lack of what he considers genuine religious and philosophical development.
Hegel's criticism of the Chinese language as lacking the necessary constructs for philosophical expression and his low estimation of Confucius and his role in Chinese moral and ethical life.
Schelling's similar assessment of Chinese culture, emphasizing its perceived lack of mythology and its categorization as a society that has excluded diversity and stifled spiritual growth.

It is important to approach these historical accounts with a critical perspective, considering the context in which these viewpoints were formed and the evolving nature of cultural understanding over time. Cultural analysis and philosophical interpretations are often influenced by the prevailing intellectual climate and the limited access to comprehensive knowledge about other cultures, leading to potential biases and misinterpretations.

黑格尔与谢林对中国和东方的论述