世纪之战51

世纪之战51

 

弧度度

 

习皇的性格成瘾分析

 

要想了解一个人，不但要察其言，还要观其行。尤其是像中共这种汲取了古今中外糟粕——集三千年邪淫技巧与马列邪教理论于一身的极权怪胎，更要时刻注意它撒谎成瘾——当面说一套背后做一套。

 

高举反腐大旗的人转移至离岸银行的惊天不义之财竟然超过万亿美元，高喊依法治国的人所干的每一件都是祸国殃民的坏事，又该如何说服十余亿饿殍去相信马列邪党是在“为人民服务”呢？

 

习皇发誓要继承毛太祖的遗志，把老毛制造的人类浩劫推向新高潮……如果你非要问习皇与毛太祖的区别是什么？那么我可以负责任地告诉你：毛病不除，恶习难改。毛太祖受制于当时的条件有限，因此只能凭借“红宝书”的传播祸害一些周边国家，譬如红色高棉统治下的柬埔寨；习皇却凭借蓝金黄的强大魔力把魔爪伸向了全世界，西方列强几乎悉数中招，成为被中共半渗透半颠覆的国家。

 

习皇的执政目标异常宏伟，不但要超越斯大林、毛泽东做千古一帝，还要干翻美国做世界领袖。前一个目标他已经基本完成，后一个目标正在倾举国之力向前推进中。

 

那么，我们该如何看待习皇这种偏执狂式的成瘾性格呢？下面，我们将从三个方面来分析解读之。

 

一、锱铢必较，睚眦必报

 

习皇的心胸比骆驼还大，心眼却比针眼还小，每天吃饱了没事干就是躲在大数据监控后面监视官民的一言一行。

 

从一开始抓捕网络领袖、异见人士，逐渐扩展到抓捕作家、律师、教授、牧师、网红……各行各业无一幸免，最后竟发展到只要你敢在网络上影射一句伟大领袖，就会遭到“扫黑除恶”的整肃，享受删帖禁言封号被捕的待遇。

 

伟大新时代不但迫害知识精英与良民，同时也“刀刃向内”地砍向那些财富精英与政治精英。

 

马云、王健林惨遭整肃，仅仅因为他们在一档节目中不小心说漏了嘴。马云说了句“凡是办公室的书架里摆很多书的，十个里有八个是骗子。”王健林接着说了句“他不但不读书，还要装出读了很多书的样子。”结果双双被查。

 

身为总理的李克强，仅仅因为在记者招待会上说了一串数字：“中国是一个人口众多的发展中国家，我们人均年收入是3万元人民币，但是有6亿人每个月的收入也就1000元，1000元在一个中等城市可能租房都困难。”这等于是戳破了共同富裕的谎言，结果遇害。

 

指鹿为马、万马齐喑的时代发展到最后，只要是官员在私底下或喝醉后发了句对习皇不满的牢骚，就逃不脱“选择性反腐“的命运，轻则被撤职，重则被查处。这样的例子不胜枚举。

 

习皇为了保住好不容易骗到手的剥削权，只能憋足了劲把内心的恐惧转嫁为全体官民的恐惧，导致举国上下，人人自危。

 

过敏反应的结果，就是打造了一个盛况空前的人间炼狱。只要你在网上讨论历史上的昏君、庸君、暴君，网警的第一反应就是“这家伙又在影射当今圣上。”

 

无论你是谈论商纣王的“酒池肉林”，周厉王的“道路以目”，秦始皇的“焚书坑儒”，隋炀帝的“好大喜功”，周幽王的“烽火戏诸侯”，还是引用晋惠帝的“何不食肉糜”，以及亡国之君北齐后主高纬的“玉体横陈夜”，明末崇祯的“越是勤政越亡国”，甚至于割地赔款的老慈禧，复辟帝制的袁世凯……统统被视为对伟大新领袖的大不敬。

 

那么问题来了：1.为何谈论“明君”时，网警绝对不会联系到是在赞美当今圣上呢？2.难道说历代昏君、庸君、暴君干过的荒废事，今上仅凭一己之力正在撸起袖子加油干？3.当一个社会与时俱进到连真实的历史都不准讲了，你觉得统治者是明君还是昏君？

 

再讲一个本人亲身经历的鬼故事吧，读完你就知道一个捂嘴禁言的至暗时代究竟有多恐怖了。新冠期间，我在写“新诗评论”时引用了印度诗人伊克巴尔的一首诗歌《你造出黑夜，我制作了明灯》：

 

你造出黑夜，我制作了明灯，

你造出黏土，我塑成了杯盆。 

你造出沙漠和丛林，

我建起花园，凿出矿井。 

我能用砂砾制成玻璃，

使毒汁变成抗毒的血清。

 

结果你猜怎么着？我的这篇文章居然被封杀了。我仔细地查了又查，终于大致明白，大约是这首诗中出现了“毒”字吧？然而这恰恰反证：坏事做绝之人的内心究竟有多么恐惧啊？时刻担心被推翻，时刻害怕被审判，如此整日整夜地睡不下安稳觉又有何幸福可言？

 

你迫害了董瑶琼还会有蒋瑶琼，你迫害了李文亮还会有张文亮，你迫害了彭载舟还会有杨载舟，你迫害了李康梦还会有王康梦，你迫害了任志强还会有赵志强，你迫害了黎智英还会有吴智英……就算你杀光所有报晓的雄鸡，天还是会亮。

 

然而，你每迫害一个人，亿万醒民心中的愤怒就会叠加一分。不要以为暂时的沉默代表着屈服，当地底的岩溶汇聚到临界点，就会化作势不可挡的火山喷发。

 

吃相难看，死相会更难看。你今天对人民有多暴戾，未来人民对你的报复就会有多凶残。前车之鉴，后世之师。希特勒、墨索里尼、齐奥塞斯库、萨达姆、卡扎菲、马杜罗、哈梅内伊等历代独裁者的下场，就是最好的证明。

 

（未完待续）

 

The Battle of the Century 51

 

Hu Dudu 

 

An Analysis of Xi Jinping's Addiction to Character

 

To understand a person, one must observe not only their words but also their actions. This is especially true for a totalitarian monstrosity like the CCP, which has absorbed the dregs of history—a fusion of three thousand years of wicked techniques and Marxist-Leninist cult theories—and its addictive lying must be constantly monitored—saying one thing to someone's face and doing another behind their back.

 

Those who wave the banner of anti-corruption have transferred over a trillion dollars in illicit wealth to offshore banks; those who proclaim the rule of law have committed countless acts of treason and harm to the nation. How can they possibly convince over a billion starving people that the Marxist-Leninist evil party is "serving the people"?

 

Xi Jinping has vowed to inherit Mao Zedong's legacy and push the human catastrophe created by Mao to a new climax… If you insist on asking what the difference is between Xi Jinping and Mao Zedong, then I can responsibly tell you: Problems must be addressed, and bad habits must be corrected. Mao Zedong, constrained by the limited resources of his time, could only exploit neighboring countries through the spread of the "Little Red Book," such as Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge. Xi Jinping, however, has extended his reach globally through the powerful influence of the CCP's "blue-gold-yellow" ideology, with almost all Western powers falling victim, becoming states partially infiltrated and subverted by the CCP.

 

Xi Jinping's governing goals are exceptionally ambitious: not only to surpass Stalin and Mao Zedong to become a supreme emperor, but also to overthrow the United States and become the world leader. He has largely achieved the former goal, and is now pushing forward the latter with the full force of the nation.

 

So, how should we view Xi Jinping's obsessive and addictive personality? Below, we will analyze and interpret this from three aspects.

 

I. Petty and Relentless Pursuit of Justice

 

Xi Jinping's heart is as big as a camel's, yet his mind is as small as a pinhole. He spends his days, with nothing better to do than hide behind big data surveillance to monitor the words and actions of officials and ordinary citizens.

 

From initially arresting online leaders and dissidents, the crackdown has gradually expanded to include writers, lawyers, professors, pastors, internet celebrities… no profession has been spared. Finally, it has escalated to the point that anyone who dares to allude to the Great Leader online will face a "crackdown on organized crime," enduring the censorship of posts, bans, account suspensions, and arrest.

 

This great new era not only persecutes intellectual elites and law-abiding citizens but also "turns the blade inward" to cut down the wealthy and political elites.

 

Jack Ma and Wang Jianlin were brutally purged simply because they inadvertently let slip something on a TV program. Ma said, "Eight out of ten people with many books on their office bookshelves are liars." Wang Jianlin then added, "They not only don't read, but they pretend to read a lot." Both were subsequently investigated.

 

Premier Li Keqiang was implicated and killed simply for stating a series of figures at a press conference: "China is a populous developing country. Our per capita annual income is 30,000 yuan, but 600 million people earn only 1,000 yuan a month. 1,000 yuan might not even be enough to rent a room in a medium-sized city." This exposed the lie of common prosperity.

 

The era of blatant disregard for facts and widespread silence has evolved to the point where any official who privately or while drunk expresses dissatisfaction with Xi Jinping is subject to "selective anti-corruption," ranging from dismissal to investigation. Countless examples illustrate this.

 

To preserve the exploitative power he so painstakingly acquired, Xi Jinping has resorted to transferring his own fears onto the entire nation, creating a climate of fear and insecurity.

 

The result of this overreaction is an unprecedented living hell. If you discuss historical tyrants, incompetent rulers, or incompetent emperors online, the first reaction of the cyber police is, "This guy is alluding to the current emperor again."

 

Whether you talk about King Zhou of Shang's "wine pool and meat forest," King Li of Zhou's "eyes on the road," Qin Shi Huang's "burning of books and burying of scholars," Emperor Yang of Sui's "ambition and love of grandiose projects," King You of Zhou's "lighting the beacon fires to amuse the feudal lords," or quote Emperor Hui of Jin's "Why don't they eat meat porridge?", or the "jade body lying horizontally at night" of Emperor Gao Wei of Northern Qi, Emperor Chongzhen of Ming's "the more diligent the government, the more the country perishes," or even Empress Dowager Cixi's ceding of territory and paying indemnities, or Yuan Shikai's attempt to restore the monarchy… all are considered a great disrespect to the great new leader.

 

So the questions are:

1. Why do the cyber police never associate discussing "wise rulers" with praising the current emperor?

2. Does this mean that the current emperor is single-handedly rectifying the wasteful deeds of past tyrants and incompetent rulers? 3. When a society progresses to the point where even true history is forbidden, do you think the ruler was a wise or foolish monarch?

 

Let me tell you another ghost story from my own experience. After reading it, you'll understand just how terrifying a dark age of censorship and silence truly is. During the COVID-19 pandemic, when I was writing a "New Poetry Review," I quoted a poem by the Indian poet Iqbal, "You Created the Night, I Made the Lamp":

 

You created the night, I made the lamp,

 

You created clay, I sculpted cups and bowls.

 

You created deserts and jungles,

 

I built gardens, dug mines.

 

I can make glass from gravel,

 

and turn poison into antitoxin serum.

 

And guess what? My article was censored! I investigated carefully and finally roughly understood that it was probably because the poem contained the word "poison." However, this precisely demonstrates how much fear resides in the hearts of those who commit heinous acts. Constantly fearing being overthrown, constantly dreading trial, what happiness can one find in sleepless nights like this?

 

You persecuted Dong Yaoqiong, but there will be Jiang Yaoqiong; you persecuted Li Wenliang, but there will be Zhang Wenliang; you persecuted Peng Zaizhou, but there will be Yang Zaizhou; you persecuted Li Kangmeng, but there will be Wang Kangmeng; you persecuted Ren Zhiqiang, but there will be Zhao Zhiqiang; you persecuted Li Zhiying, but there will be Wu Zhiying… Even if you kill every rooster that crows at dawn, the sun will still rise.

 

However, with each person you persecute, the anger in the hearts of hundreds of millions of awakened people will grow stronger. Don't think that temporary silence represents surrender; when the karst beneath the earth reaches its breaking point, it will erupt like an unstoppable volcano.

 

Your behavior is ugly, but your death will be even uglier. The more brutal you are to the people today, the more ferocious the people's revenge will be in the future. Learn from the past, for the future. The fates of dictators throughout history, including Hitler, Mussolini, Ceausescu, Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, Maduro, and Khamenei, serve as the best proof.

 

(To be continued)