London Goes First: Britain Keeps Breaking the Wests Taboos on Ukraine
By: Giorgio Provinciali
Live from Ukraine ??
In the month when most people are focused on summer vacations, we cant help but think about how murderous the upcoming winter will be. For this reason, we want to sincerely thank those who think of us and support us. If our voices continue to fly freely, it is mainly because of you.
Kyiv In russias war against Ukraine, London has almost always done the same thing: it decided first.
On August 24, 2026, Ukraines Independence Day, three capitals spoke three different political grammars. In Kyiv, the British prime ministerannouncedthat MBDA would be allowed to share with Ukraine classified information on the British components of SCALP the French version of Storm Shadow required for local assembly lines, and signed the agreement making the United Kingdom the first international partner of Avengers AI Labs, a platform containing five million annotated battlefield images, largely drawn from the DELTA system. At UN headquarters, meanwhile, Washingtondeclined to signthe appeal by fifty countries and the European Union calling on russia to halt its attacks. In moscow, a CIA representative and the Vaticans top diplomat were arriving.
The decision removes the technological constraint that had prevented a capability received from abroad from becoming an at least partly sovereign industrial capacity. Quantities are unknown and timelines disputed, but one fact is certain: Ukraine already has the production capacity to begin immediately. Paris and Kyiv are aiming for an assembly line by years end, while analysts expect the process to take years. kremlin spokesman Peskovsaidthat Britain is participating in this war andannouncedthat intelligence services would seek out the future production lines in order to destroy them.
Once again, London is the first to assume a responsibility that many partners consider necessary but that nobody else yet wants to make explicit.
The founding precedent that we remember most clearly in Ukraine dates to January 17, 2022. While many capitals read the russian buildup as negotiating pressure, Londonannouncedthe shipment ofNLAWanti-tank systems andinstructors, after Operation Orbitalhad trainedmore than 22,000 Ukrainian service members since 2015. The NLAWs did not decide the Battle of Kyiv on their own, but they made resistance against the mechanized columns feasible and demonstrated thatarming Ukraine before the attack did not produce the escalation invoked by the kremlin.
That summer, with russias full-scale invasion of Ukraine under way,Operation Interflexturnedbilateral training into an international force-generation pipeline through which more than 63,000 Ukrainian service membershad passedfortraining in the United Kingdomby this summer. We personally know many of them very many. TheInternational Fund for Ukrainebelongsto the same logic: eleven countries and more than 2 billion converted into joint orders for air defense and uncrewed systems.
In January 2023camethe fourteenChallenger 2s. We remember them very well because, though militarily limited in number, they carried enormous political weight: they stripped Western reluctance over modern tanks of its collective justification, and the debate over Leopard 2s and Abrams tanks became an organizational and industrial one. In March, London added the most taboo-breaking of its firsts,confirmingthat the Challengers would come withdepleted-uranium armor-piercing ammunition. putininvokeda nuclear component and promised a response. London recalled that depleted uranium had been a standard component of armor-piercing ammunition for decades and had nothing to do with nuclear capability. Six months later, Washington announced the same ammunition for the Abrams. We too wrote about it extensively from the field.
This has often been Britains function: to absorb the initial cost of a decision and reduce the political cost of imitation.
February 8, 2023, was the day of the famous helmet Zelensky delivered to the House of Commons bearing the words We have freedom. Give us wings to protect it. Londonexpandedtraining to fighter pilots and, together with the Netherlands,promotedthe F-16 coalition, later led in practical terms by Copenhagen and The Hague.
In May 2023cametheStorm Shadows, described in political language as long-range missiles. Technically, they are stand-off cruise missiles with a range of more than 250 kilometers; the imprecise label measured the taboo that allies believed they were breaking. They expanded the target set as far as occupied Crimea and, together with drones and Ukrainian strike systems, helped disperse part of the Black Sea Fleet away from Sevastopol. France followed with SCALP, then came ATACMS. An exceptional capability became ordinary; the August 2026 step transfers its industrial know-how.
In May 2024, then-Foreign Secretary David Cameronsaidthatit was for Ukraine to decide how to use British weapons, including the right to strike the bases of aggression inside russian territory. The reactionwas the summoningof the ambassador and a threat to strike British targets in Ukraine and beyond. The mechanism repeated itself exactly:russia proclaimed a red line, London crossed it in a controlled way, the promised strategic retaliation failed to materialize, and the allies room for decision widened.
On January 12, 2024,the United Kingdombecame the first G7 country to signa bilateral security agreement with Ukraine,expandedin January 2025 by the100 Year Partnership. Londonhas committedroughly 16 billion in military assistance, promising at least 3 billion a year through 203031, andthe policy has held through five prime ministers and a change of governing party: the donors answer to the same electoral cycles from whichUkraines defense must be made independent.
At sea, sanctions became actual interdiction. AfterLondonauthorizedthe boarding of sanctioned shadow-fleet vesselsin March, the Royal Marines and the National Crime Agencyseized controlof the tanker Smyrtos in the English Channel, in international waters and in coordination with France: the first British operation of its kind. Other states had already stopped individual vessels, butthe precedent lies in moving from lists to physical enforcement within a declared legal framework precisely what moscows commercial apparatus fears most.
The price is documented. In September 2024, the National Audit Officevaluedstockpile donations at no less than 171.5 million and estimated replacement costs at 2.71 billion. Then there is the strategic cost:the presence of the Yantar near undersea infrastructure, lasers directed at RAF aircraft, GPS jamming, sabotage, criminal proxies. The patternshowsthat moscow considers London a strategic adversary, not simply one donor among many.
That is exactly whydistinguishing black from white has become indispensable. Western public discourse has produced a linguistic mush in which aggression, self-defense, negotiation, and responsibility mix until they lose their meaning. Used on its own, the noun conflict erases the cause and direction of a war that the United Nationshas definedas aggression against Ukraine, one that began in 2014 with Crimea and the Donbas. The phrase russian-Ukrainian conflict places the two states on the same grammatical plane and omits who crossed the border. In our appearances on Italian radio and television,the war of aggression that we experience firsthand has repeatedly been presented to us from afar as a conflict.
russian bombs do not fall on a territory disputed between two equivalent actors. They fall on the cities of an internationally recognized state invaded by another.
The visit to moscow by Paul Richard Gallagher who arrived, indeed, on Independence Day makes that distortion plain. On August 25, standing beside Lavrov at the first in-person meeting at this level in five years, hecalledit urgent and necessary to end the conflict andannouncedhumanitarian cooperation on children affected by the war: with the foreign minister of the state that deported those children, without naming the deportations.
Every appeal to the parties should instead specify what is being asked of russia: end the aggression, withdraw its forces, free prisoners and deported civilians, return the children, accept territorial integrity.Without these verbs and this subject, the formula becomes material that russian propaganda can reuse.
The same structure appears in American statements. At the Security Council, the U.S. representative to ECOSOC, Dan Negrea,congratulatedUkraine on its independence beforeinvitingboth sides to halt attacks on civilian ships andaskingmoscow and Kyiv to return to the table. Protecting civilian vessels is an obligation of every belligerent; turning equality of humanitarian obligations into equality of political responsibility is a different operation. And there is no military solution is only half true:moscow has spent twelve years trying to impose a political solution by military means, and an agreement reached under occupation and bombardment formalizes coercion rather than eliminating it.
There is, finally, a historical root that London shares. On December 5, 1994, Ukraine, russia, the United States, and the United Kingdomsignedthe Budapest Memorandum.In exchange for denuclearization, Ukraine received security assurances, not Article 5.Kyivhad inheritedroughly 1,900 strategic warheads and thousands of tactical warheads already transferred to russia by 1992 andrelinquishedthe worlds third-largest nuclear arsenal.
British support therefore expresses, before generosity, the responsibility of a signatory a responsibility London has interpreted more consistently than many others have.
The distinction also appears in energy policy.Since January 1, 2023, the United Kingdomhas bannedimports of russian LNG. In the first half of 2026, European Union ports insteadreceivedroughly 9.97 million metric tons from Yamal, 16 percent more than the previous record, worth nearly 6 billion, with spot contracts banned only in spring 2026 and the full ban expected in 2027.Britains stain must also be recorded. According to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, ships owned or insured in the United Kingdomfacilitatedrussian LNG exports worth tens of billions of pounds for years, with the ban on maritime servicesimplementedonly in 2026.
The British have made mistakes and will make more: insufficient stockpiles, production delays, maritime contradictions. Sanctifying London would be as useless as dissolving it into the indistinct mass of allies. Yetthe hierarchy of facts remains clear: arms before the invasion; multinational training in 2022; tanks, depleted uranium, pilots, and deep-strike missiles in 2023; the first G7 agreement and the right to strike the sources of aggression in 2024; interdiction of the shadow fleet, missile technology, and artificial-intelligence data in 2026.
At every step, London turned the political risk of going first into a collective possibility and forced the reluctant to explain their delay.That is why russia monitors it, threatens it, and describes it as a belligerent.russia invaded Ukraine and Ukraine is resisting. That must be stated plainly, along with the fact that some countries have assumed greater responsibilities than others.Calling these facts by their names prevents propagandas linguistic mush from erasing the difference between those who wage a war of aggression, those who suffer it, and those who genuinely help stop it.
In 1.643 days of war, we recorded over 300 videos from ground zero and wrote more than 3,000 articles at least 1,600 in English, and over 1,400 in Italian.
Were doing our best to provide genuine, first-hand reports from zones where almost no press dares to go. This means living in a kill zone constantly. We take the risk, but without your invaluable support, our voices would remain unheard and silent. Without brave people sharing our articles from afar, they would remain unread. Our reports would go unseen, and our efforts would be lost. Theres still a lot of work to do here, as the people around us are also in no better situation.
Were renewing our fundraising campaign and thanking everyone who joins us in helping to restore what Russia is destroying. Moving forward, not even with a small reimbursement for each article we write, is extremely challenging. Thats why we are grateful to all the kind people who support us and trust in our mission.
Even a small donation helps.
Well keep you updated on developments.
Thank you all, dear friends ??
伦敦率先破局：英国不断打破西方在乌克兰问题上的禁忌
作者：Giorgio Provinciali
翻译：旺财球球
乌克兰前线报道??
在大多数人都沉浸于夏日假期的这个月份里，我们却无法不去思考即将到来的那个严酷甚至致命的冬天。因此，我们想向所有一直惦记着我们、支持着我们的人致以最诚挚的感谢。我们的声音之所以仍能自由地传播、被世界听见，那么这一切首先要归功于你们。
向Giorgio Provinciali捐款
通过捐款或与朋友分享来支持Giorgio Provinciali
向Alla Perdei捐款
通过捐款或与朋友分享来支持Alla Perdei
基辅在俄罗斯对乌克兰发动的战争中，伦敦几乎始终在做同一件事：率先作出决定。
2026年8月24日，乌克兰独立日，三个首都发出了三种截然不同的政治信号。在基辅，英国首相宣布，允许欧洲导弹集团（MBDA）向乌克兰分享风暴之影导弹法制版本SCALP中英国部件的机密信息，以满足乌克兰本地生产线的组装需求；同时，双方签署协议，英国成为复仇者人工智能实验室（Avengers AI Labs）的首个国际合作伙伴。该平台包含500万张经过标注的战场图像，其中大部分来自DELTA系统。与此同时，在联合国总部，美国拒绝签署由50个国家和欧盟共同发起、呼吁俄罗斯停止袭击的声明。而在莫斯科，一名中央情报局代表和梵蒂冈最高外交官正先后抵达。
这一决定移除了此前的技术障碍，使乌克兰从国外获得的能力得以转化为至少部分自主的工业能力。具体数量尚不清楚，时间表也存在争议，但有一点是确定的：乌克兰已经具备立即启动生产的能力。巴黎和基辅的目标是在今年年底前建成组装线，而分析人士预计这一过程可能需要数年。克里姆林宫发言人佩斯科夫表示，英国正在参与这场战争，并宣布俄情报机构将设法找到未来的生产线，以便摧毁它们。
再一次，伦敦率先承担了一项许多伙伴认为有必要、却仍无人愿意明确承担的责任。
（错误仍然会发生：我手里的这枚覆盆子，是在一架俄罗斯无人机内部发现的版权所有，Giorgio Provinciali）
乌克兰人记忆中最清晰的先例，始于2022年1月17日。当许多首都仍把俄罗斯的军事集结视为谈判施压时，伦敦宣布向乌克兰提供NLAW反坦克导弹及教官。自2015年以来，轨道行动已经培训了超过2.2万名乌克兰军人。NLAW并没有单独决定基辅战役的胜负，但它们使乌克兰具备了抵抗俄机械化纵队的能力，也证明了一个事实：在入侵之前武装乌克兰，并不会导致克里姆林宫所宣称的那种升级。
同年夏天，随着俄罗斯对乌克兰的全面入侵持续进行，互联行动将双边培训转变为一条国际化的兵力生成管线。到今年夏天，已经有超过6.3万名乌克兰军人在英国接受培训。我们亲自认识其中许多人非常多。乌克兰国际基金遵循的也是同一逻辑：11个国家投入超过20亿英镑，用于联合采购防空系统和无人作战系统。
2023年1月，英国又提供了14辆挑战者2主战坦克。我们对它们记忆犹新，因为尽管数量在军事上十分有限，但它们却承载着巨大的政治意义：这些坦克打破了西方在现代主战坦克问题上继续犹豫的集体借口；此后，关于豹2和艾布拉姆斯坦克的争论，转变成了组织和工业层面的讨论。同年3月，伦敦又迈出了其一系列破禁行动中最具争议的一步，确认挑战者2将配备贫铀穿甲弹。普京借此宣称存在核因素，并承诺作出回应。伦敦则指出，贫铀数十年来一直是穿甲弹的标准组成部分，与核能力毫无关系。六个月后，美国宣布将为艾布拉姆斯坦克提供同类弹药。我们也曾从前线对此进行过大量报道。
这往往正是英国所扮演的角色：承担率先作出决定的初始代价，从而降低其他国家效仿时的政治成本。
（图：我在《泰晤士报》Frontline栏目发表的最新文章）
2023年2月8日，是泽连斯基向英国下议院赠送那顶著名头盔的日子。头盔上写着这样一句话：我们拥有自由，请给予我们保护自由的翅膀。伦敦扩大了对（乌克兰）飞行员培训，并与荷兰共同推动建立F-16战机联盟。后来，这一联盟在实际执行层面由哥本哈根和海牙发挥了主导作用。
2023年5月，英国提供风暴之影导弹，政治语言将其描述为远程导弹。技术上，它们属于射程超过250公里的防区外巡航导弹；而这种并不精确的称谓，反映的其实是盟国认为自己正在突破的一项政治禁忌。这些导弹将乌克兰可打击的目标范围延伸至被占领的克里米亚，并与无人机和乌克兰自主研发的打击系统一道，帮助迫使黑海舰队分散部署，远离塞瓦斯托波尔。法国随后提供SCALP巡航导弹，接着是美国的ATACMS陆军战术导弹系统。曾经极为特殊的能力，逐渐变成了常态；而2026年8月的这一步，则是将相关工业知识转移给乌克兰。
2024年5月，时任英国外交大臣戴维卡梅伦表示，如何使用英国武器，由乌克兰自行决定，其中包括打击俄罗斯境内侵略基地的权利。俄罗斯的反应是召见英国大使，并威胁要打击乌克兰境内及其他地方的英国目标。其运作机制再次精准地重复了一遍：俄罗斯划定一条红线，伦敦以可控方式跨过这条红线；俄罗斯承诺的战略报复并未出现；盟友们的决策空间则随之扩大。
2024年1月12日，英国成为七国集团中首个与乌克兰签署双边安全协议的国家。2025年1月，这一协议又通过百年伙伴关系得到扩展。英国已经承诺提供约160亿英镑的军事援助，并保证到20302031年度之间，每年至少提供30亿英镑。无论经历五任首相，还是发生执政党更替，这项政策始终延续不变。这是捐助国对同一选举周期的回应：乌克兰的国防建设必须逐渐摆脱这些周期的影响。
在海上，制裁开始转化为实际拦截行动。英国于3月授权登临检查受制裁的影子船队船只后，皇家海军陆战队和国家犯罪局与法国协调行动，于英吉利海峡的国际水域控制了油轮斯米尔托斯号。这是英国首次实施此类行动。其他国家此前已经拦截过个别船只，但这一先例的关键在于：在明确宣布的法律框架内，英国从制裁名单迈向了实际执法，而这正是莫斯科商业体系最担心的事情。
（图：Alla在乌克兰伊久姆的报道??。SCALP和风暴之影将有助于解放更多乌克兰城市版权所有，Giorgio Provinciali）
代价有据可查。2024年9月，英国国家审计署估算，英国捐出的库存价值至少为1.715亿英镑，而补充这些库存的成本则高达27.1亿英镑。此外，还有战略层面的代价：俄方扬塔尔号情报船出现在海底基础设施附近；俄罗斯曾用激光照射英国皇家空军飞机；还持续实施GPS干扰、破坏活动，并利用犯罪代理人。这一模式表明，莫斯科将伦敦视为战略对手，而不仅仅是众多援助者中的一个。
正因如此，区分黑与白才变得不可或缺。西方公共话语已经制造出一种语言上的混沌，把侵略、自卫、谈判和责任搅在一起，直到它们失去原本的意义。单独使用冲突一词，会抹去这场战争的起因和方向。联合国已经将其定义为对乌克兰的侵略，而这场战争始于2014年的克里米亚和顿巴斯。俄乌冲突这一说法，在语法层面上把两个国家置于同等地位，却省略了是谁越过了边界。在意大利广播和电视节目中，我们亲身经历的侵略战争，却一次又一次被远方的评论者称作冲突。
俄罗斯的炸弹并不是落在两个对等行为体之间存在争议的领土上。它们落在一个国际承认的、却遭到另一个国家入侵的主权国家的城市之中。
保罗理查德加拉格尔访问莫斯科一事，使这种扭曲变得显而易见；而他恰恰是在乌克兰独立日抵达莫斯科。8月25日，在五年来双方如此级别官员首次举行的面对面会晤中，他与拉夫罗夫并肩而立。他称结束冲突是紧迫且必要的，并宣布将在受战争影响儿童问题上开展人道主义合作。然而，他面对的是那个强行驱逐这些儿童的国家的外交部长，却没有提及这些驱逐行为。
因此，每一次呼吁各方采取行动时，都应明确指出对俄罗斯提出了什么要求：结束侵略、撤出军队、释放战俘和被驱逐的平民、送还儿童、接受乌克兰的领土完整。如果没有这些动词，也没有明确的主语，那么这种表述就会变成俄罗斯宣传机器可以反复利用的原材料。
（图：乌克兰从一开始就应当发展反弹道导弹系统。遗憾的是，在经历近13年的战争、其中近5年为大规模战争之后，乌克兰仍然没有这样的系统版权所有，Giorgio Provinciali）
美国的声明中也出现了同样的叙事结构。在联合国安理会，美国经济及社会理事会代表丹内格里亚先向乌克兰致以独立日祝贺，随后邀请双方停止攻击民用船只，并呼吁莫斯科和基辅重返谈判桌。保护民用船只，是每一个交战方都必须履行的义务；但把人道义务的平等转化为政治责任的平等，则是另一回事。军事手段无法解决问题这句话也只说对了一半：莫斯科已经用军事手段强加政治解决方案长达12年之久；在占领和轰炸之下达成的协议，只会将胁迫正式化，而不是消除胁迫。
最后，还有一个伦敦与乌克兰共同面对的历史根源。1994年12月5日，乌克兰、俄罗斯、美国和英国签署了《布达佩斯备忘录》。作为放弃核武的交换，乌克兰获得的是安全保证，而非北约第五条式的集体防御承诺。乌克兰继承了大约1900枚战略核弹头以及数千枚战术核弹头，后者早在1992年就已转交给俄罗斯，并放弃了当时世界第三大的核武库。
因此，英国对乌克兰的支持首先体现的并不是慷慨，而是签署国应承担的责任。而在众多签署国中，伦敦对这项责任的理解和履行，一直比许多其他国家更为一贯。
这种区别同样体现在能源政策上。自2023年1月1日起，英国禁止进口俄罗斯液化天然气。然而，2026年上半年，欧盟港口仍接收了约997万吨来自亚马尔的液化天然气，比此前纪录高出16%，总价值接近60亿欧元。欧盟直到2026年春季才禁止现货合同，全面禁令则预计要到2027年才会生效。英国自身也有污点。根据能源与清洁空气研究中心的数据，多年来，由英国拥有或承保的船只一直在协助价值数百亿英镑的俄罗斯液化天然气出口，而英国直到2026年才实施针对相关海运服务的禁令。
英国犯过错误，今后也会继续犯错：库存不足、生产延迟，以及海上政策上的矛盾。将伦敦神圣化，与把它融入盟友这一模糊不清的整体，同样无济于事。然而，事实的层次仍然清晰可见：
-在全面入侵发生前就开始提供武器；
- 2022年推动多国联合训练计划；- 2023年提供坦克、贫铀弹药、飞行员培训和远程打击导弹；
- 2024年签署七国集团首份双边安全协议，并支持乌克兰打击侵略来源的权利；
- 2026年拦截影子船队，转移导弹技术，并共享人工智能数据。
每一个糊的哑巴，伦敦都将率先行动的政治风险转化为集体行动的可能，并迫使那些犹豫不决者解释自己为何迟迟不行动。这就是为什么俄罗斯一直监视伦敦、威胁伦敦，并将其描述为交战方。俄罗斯入侵了乌克兰，而乌克兰正在抵抗。
这一点必须被清楚地说出来；与此同时，也必须承认，一些国家承担了比其他国家更多的责任。只有直呼其名，才能防止宣传机器制造的语言混沌抹去三者之间的区别：发动侵略战争的人、承受战争的人，以及真正帮助制止战争的人。
（图：独立的代价版权所有，Giorgio Provinciali）
***
在1643天的战争中，我们从前线录制了300多段视频，并撰写了3000多篇文章其中至少1600篇为英文，1400篇为意大利文。
我们尽最大努力从几乎没有媒体敢进入的地带进行真实的一手报道，这意味着我们长期生活在杀伤区。我们承担风险，但若没有你们宝贵的支持，我们的声音将无从传出。若没有远方的勇敢的人们转发分享我们的文章，它们将无人问津。我们的报道会被忽视，我们的努力将付诸流水。这里还有大量工作要做，周围的人们境况同样艰难。
我们正在更新筹款活动，感谢每一位加入我们、帮助修复俄罗斯破坏的人们。仅靠一家勇敢的报纸为我们每篇文章支付微薄稿酬以维持前线报道极为困难。因此，我们感激所有支持并信任我们使命的善良人们。
哪怕是小小的捐助也有助益。
我们会持续为你们更新事态进展。
谢谢大家，亲爱的朋友们??
向Giorgio Provinciali捐款
通过捐款或与朋友分享来支持Giorgio Provinciali
向Alla Perdei捐款
通过捐款或与朋友分享来支持Alla Perdei
