反对党抨击 英国首相斯塔默为访华辩护

反对党猛烈抨击英国首相斯塔默访华，称“北京完全把英国耍得团团转”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulpLEF0HWcY

Mint 2026年2月3日

英国首相基尔·斯塔默试图为他的访华辩护，称这是他的前任们“错失的良机”。与此同时，反对党猛烈抨击他的此次访问，称北京完全把他耍得团团转，而且他“空手而归”。

我的三位前任中，没有一位与习近平主席举行过会晤。八年来，没有一位英国首相访问过中国。八年来，错失了无数良机。

与此同时，议长先生，在此期间，姆龙总统访问了中国三次。德国领导人访问了四次。加拿大总理几周前也访问了中国。默茨总理和特朗普总统都即将访问中国。

在这种情况下，拒绝接触将是一个极其不明智的决定。斯勒格先生，你必须收回你刚才那番话。收回。谢谢。我们能冷静一下吗？我知道你肯定想引起我的注意，我也想听听你接下来要说什么。所以，我们不要错失良机。首相先生，议长先生，在这种情况下，拒绝参与是失职，是将英国的利益置于边缘。令人难以置信的是，议会中竟然还有人鼓吹这种做法。但是，议长先生，真正的领导者不会躲藏。

相反，我们会参与。而且我们会按照自己的方式参与。因为和我们的盟友一样，我们明白参与能让我们更强大。

议长先生，保护国家安全不容谈判。我们清醒地认识到来自中国的威胁，我们将毫不动摇地努力保障英国人民的安全。正因如此，我们赋予了安全部门最新的权力和工具，以便他们能够打击任何形式的外国间谍活动，以及恶意网络活动。

但事实上，议长先生，我们可以同时做到两件事。我们既可以保护自身安全，也可以寻求合作之道。正是本着这种精神，我们进行了此次访问。

我与习近平主席、李总理和其他高级领导人进行了数小时的深入讨论。

讨论积极且富有建设性。我们涵盖了从战略稳定到贸易和投资等各个方面的问题，开辟了直接沟通渠道，以维护国家利益，使我们能够向中国最高层坦诚地表达对影响我国国家安全的活动的关切。我们同意加强网络安全对话，并就气候和自然问题达成新的伙伴关系，为这一至关重要的问题提供亟需的全球领导力。

议长先生，我还提出了一些对我国至关重要的分歧领域。

我提出了李健熙案，并呼吁释放他，明确表达了议会中对此的强烈感受。这些讨论将继续进行，我的尊敬的同事外交部长正在与李健熙先生的家人联系，提供进一步的情况通报。

我在辛阳和西藏提出了我们的人权关切。我们讨论了台湾问题、更广泛的地区稳定、伊朗和中东问题。我呼吁中国停止对俄罗斯战争的经济支持，包括对提供两用技术公司的支持，并敦促中国利用其对普京的影响力，推动乌克兰亟需的停火。

议长先生，我还提到本院议员受到中国当局制裁的事实。

作为回应，中方已明确表示，所有针对议员的此类限制均已解除。我要明确指出，这并非交易的结果。正是如此。

是的，议员们希望看到更多。我理解。但这恰恰是关键所在。八年来对中国置之不理毫无成效。

这一举措只是一个初步迹象，而非全部，它预示着通过领导人就敏感问题进行直接对话，维护英国利益，能够取得怎样的进展。

我们并非反对首相与中国接触。我们批评的是他软弱无能、目光短浅的做法。

我相信首相的出发点是好的。但他一贯的谈判策略就是拱手让出一切，希望以此换取别人对他的好感。首相甚至在登机前就已经表明，他会不惜一切代价来展现他与中国的良好关系。但中国会利用每一次互动来提升自身地位。

首相看起来很享受这次旅行。事实上，对于一个几乎毕生都是共产主义者的人来说，这简直就像梦想成真。

但除了（欢呼的）议长先生，除了他行李箱里的拉布娃娃（我希望他检查过里面有没有虫子），他几乎一无所获。我们都希望苏格兰威士忌的关税降低，但如果首相肯花点时间和

就像我两周前所做的那样，他应该明白，他们真正需要的是更便宜的能源和更低的税收。

他还得到了什么？免签旅行。中国已经向其他国家提供免签待遇了。这根本不足以换来一次总理访问。但最糟糕的是，议长先生，最糟糕的是，首相竟然把解除对四名保守党议员的制裁吹捧成一项辉煌的胜利，好像他给了我们天大的恩惠似的。让我告诉他，这些议员之所以受到制裁，是因为他们敢于对抗中国。他们敢于反对侵犯人权的行为。他们敢于反对中国以他不敢的方式监视我们的议员。这些人并不想去中国。中国人也知道这一点。他们知道，他们给了他一些根本不需要付出任何代价的东西。

为什么英国首相就看不清这一点呢？我要告诉各位议长先生，以及全体议员，就像对待“混沌群岛”事件一样，首相又一次被耍了。中国即将在伦敦市中心建造一个庞大的间谍中心，而他甚至在登机前就必须支付赎金。

我绝不会允许英国被这样挟持。首相又一次让我们的国家在世界上的地位更加弱势。他的整个经济政策就是对企业增税、加强监管，并让能源价格高到让我们去工业化。然后我们就可以进口中国的风力涡轮机、太阳能电池板、电动汽车电池，所有这些都是在一个几乎每隔一周就在建造一座燃煤电厂的国家生产的。

他跟他们谈过这些吗？他的首相这次访问为吉米·李带来了什么好处？什么也没有。中国承诺停止向普京在乌克兰的战争机器提供资金了吗？听起来不像。这次访问为那些被奴役的弱者带来了什么好处？绝对没有。中国同意停止他们持续不断的网络攻击了吗？他们同意了吗？我们都知道答案。

事实是，中国展现了实力，而英国则被彻底压制。

Opposition TORCHES UK PM Starmer Over China Visit, Says 'Beijing Just Pushed Britain Around'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulpLEF0HWcY
Mint 2026年2月3日

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer tried to defend his visit to China, calling it a 'missed opportunity' by his predecessors. Meanwhile, the opposition ripped into him over the visit, saying that Beijing had just pushed him around, and that he 'came back with nothing substantial'. 

Of my three predecessors, none held a single meeting with President Xi. For eight years, no British Prime Minister visited China. Eight years of missed opportunities.

Meanwhile, Mr. Speaker, over that period, President Mron visited China three times. German leaders four times. The Canadian Prime Minister was there a few weeks ago. Chancellor Mertz and President Trump are both due to visit shortly.

In this context, refusing to engage would be a derelic order. Just Mr. Slug, you will be withdrawing that remark. You withdraw. Thank you. Can we calm it down because I'm sure you'll be want to catch my eye and I would like to hear what you're going to say. So, let's not ruin the opportunity. Prime Minister, Mr. Speaker, in this context, refusing to engage would be a dereliction of duty, leaving British interests on the sideline. And incredibly, some in this house still advocate that approach. But, Mr. Speaker, leaders do not hide.

Instead, we engage. And we do so on our own terms. Because like our allies, we understand that engagement makes us stronger. 

Mr. Speaker, protecting our national security is non-negotiable. We're cleareyed about the threats coming from China in that regard, and we will never waver in our efforts to keep the British people safe. That is why we've given our security services the updated powers and tools that they need to tackle foreign espionage activity wherever they find it and tackle malicious cyber activity as well.

But the fact is, Mr. Speaker, we can do two things at once. We can protect ourselves whilst also finding ways to cooperate. And it was in that spirit that we made this visit.

I had extensive discussions over many hours with President Xi, Premier Lee, and other senior leaders.

The discussions were positive and constructive. We covered the full range of issues from strategic stability to trade and investment, opening a direct channel of communication to deliver in the national interest, enabling us to raise frank concerns about activities that impact our national security at the most senior levels of the Chinese system. We agreed to intensify dialogue on cyber issues and we agreed a new partnership on climate and nature providing much neededed global leadership on this vital issue.

And Mr. Speaker, I raised a number of areas of difference which matter deeply to this country.

I raised the case of Jimmy Lie and called for his release making clear the strength of feeling in this house. Those discussions will continue and my right honorable friend the foreign secretary is in touch with Mr. Li's family to provide further briefing.

I raised our human rights concerns in Shinyang and Tibet. We discussed Taiwan, wider regional stability, Iran and the Middle East. I called on China to end economic support for Russia's war effort, including companies providing dual use technologies and I urged them to use their influence on Putin to push for the muchneeded ceasefire in Ukraine.

And Mr. Speaker, I also raised the fact that members of this house have been sanctioned by the Chinese authorities.

In response, the Chinese have now made it clear that all such restrictions on parliamentarians no longer apply. And I want to be clear this was not the result of a trade. Exactly.

Yes, members will want to see more. I understand that. But that is precisely the point. Ignoring China for eight years achieved nothing.

This step is an early indication, not the sum total, of the kind of progress that this sort of engagement can achieve through leaderto-leer discussion on sensitive issues to stand up for British interest.

It is not the prime minister engaging with China that we take issue with. What we are criticizing is his supine and short-termist approach.

I am sure the prime minister I'm sure the prime minister means well. But his negotiating tactic has always been to give everything away in the hope that people will be nice to him in return. Before the prime minister even got on the plane, he'd already shown that he would do anything to demonstrate his good relationship with China. But China uses every interaction to improve its own position.

The prime minister looked like he enjoyed his trip. In fact, it looked like a dream come true for a man who was virtually a communist most of his life.

But apart from the [cheering] Mr. Speaker, apart from the Laboo doll in his suitcase, and I hope he's checked it for bugs, he has come back with next to nothing. We all want cheaper tariffs for Scottish whiskey, but if the prime minister bothered to speak to the whiskey industry like I did two weeks ago, he would know that what they really need is cheaper energy and lower taxes.

What else did he get? Visa free travel. China already offers this to other countries. It's not big enough for a prime ministerial visit. But the worst thing, Mr. Speaker, the worst thing was the prime minister claiming a glorious triumph with the lifting of sanctions on four conservative MPs as if he'd done us a favor. Let me tell him, those MPs were sanctioned because they stood up to China. They they stood up against human rights abuses. They stood up against the country spying on our MPs in a way that he wouldn't dare. Those people don't want to go to China. The Chinese know that. They know that they are giving him something that costs absolutely nothing.

Why can't the British prime minister see that? And I say to you, Mr. Speaker, and the whole house, like with the Chaos Islands, the Prime Minister has been played. China is about to build an enormous spy hub in the center of London, a ransom he had to pay before he could even get on the plane.

I would never allow Britain to be held over a barrel like that. Yet again, the prime minister has negotiated our country into a weaker position in the world. His entire economic policy is to tax business more, regulate them harder, and make energy so expensive that we de-industrialize. And then we can import Chinese wind turbines, Chinese solar panels, Chinese batteries for electric vehicles, all manufactured in a country that is building a coal fired power station every other week.

Did he speak to them about that? What did his chief his trip achieve for Jimmy Lie? Nothing. Did China promise to stop fueling Putin's war machine in Ukraine? Doesn't sound like it. What did this trip achieve for the weaguers who are being enslaved? Absolutely nothing. Have China agreed to stop their relentless cyber attacks? Have they? We all know
the answer to that. The reality is that China showed its strength and Britain was pushed around literally.