风萧萧_Frank
以文会友
万斯说 我们进行恐吓说教和教训 中国修建道路桥梁提供食物
美国当选副总统 JD Vance US Vice President-elect, JD Vance
J.D. Vance about US Foreign Policy
我们制定的外交政策是对那些不愿与之有任何瓜葛的国家进行恐吓、说教和教训。而中国的外交政策是修建道路桥梁，为穷人提供食物。我认为，我们应该奉行一种外交政策，一种尊重的外交，一种不植根于说教的外交政策。这种外交政策应该植根于我们国家的国家利益。
我们制定的外交政策是对那些不愿与之有任何瓜葛的国家进行恐吓、说教和教训。而中国的外交政策是修建道路桥梁，为穷人提供食物。我认为，我们应该奉行一种外交政策，一种尊重的外交，一种不植根于说教的外交政策。这种外交政策应该植根于我们国家的国家利益。
非洲小黑哥蔑视高志凯：你虚伪！看高教授如何回应！多哈论坛中非激烈辩论。美副总统赞中国帮助非洲！称要学习！哀其不争
2025年9月14日 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaVDqlCr5SM
主持人
中国的外交政策是修路架桥，救济贫困人口。我认为我们应该奉行一种尊重的外交政策。那么，中国在哪些核心原则方面做得对，值得世界其他国家学习呢？
高智凯
非常感谢Fima。我很荣幸来到这里，也向各位尊敬的听众、其他小组成员，以及台上的各位杰出的学生们致以问候。首先，我认为我们生活的世界是一个多极世界。如果有人说他们想回到单极世界，那简直是不可能完成的任务。过去46年来，中国一直在建设中国特色社会主义。我认为更重要的是中国特色。那么，这些特色是什么呢？这真是一个千古难题。我想说，在过去40年左右的时间里，中国一直高度重视发展。
肖英表示，发展是硬道理。我们相信每个国家都需要发展，任何国家都不应自满。任何国家都不应固步自封，甚至不应试图阻碍其他国家的发展。因此，稳定至关重要，维护世界和平至关重要，推动各种自由贸易和市场经济也同样重要。放眼世界，中国始终强调互联互通和基础设施建设的重要性。为什么？因为我们从中受益匪浅。中国有句俗语：要想富，先修路。这就是为什么中国热衷于建设，而其他一些国家却不热衷于建设。他们可能更倾向于破坏。所以，我认为，选择非常明确。让我们真正关注发展、稳定与和平，并始终相信发展是硬道理、软道理和智慧道理。谢谢。所以，维克多，你让我们对中国模式有了些了解。从你描述中国如何看待自己和世界其他国家的方式来看，我们可以向全球输出哪些理念？或者说，你认为中国可以向全球输出哪些理念？
嗯，我认为中国并不掌握真理。
真理总是相对的。有些真理对你有用，但对其他人可能不起作用。我认为从中国的角度来看，有几件事确实非常重要。第一，没有民主就没有现代化。所以中国并不反对民主。中国提倡民主。
但另一方面，民主没有固定的模式。你需要根据自己的国情调整民主，并建立自己独特的制度。其次，我们经常听到关于人权的讨论。人权非常重要。但我认为从中国的角度来看，人权并非存在于真空之中。人权需要与人类义务相平衡。你
不能只谈论人权，而不平等地谈论人类的义务。因此，我认为
中国人的视角更加平衡，更加包容，而不是片面。例如，在这个
八月大厅里，我不能喊火。这
不是我言论自由的行使。这实际上是违法的。例如，如果我的
喊叫导致被贴邮票。
因此，我认为当我们谈论所有这些事情时，我们需要非常谨慎地理解这些标签的真正含义。很快，英国几百年来都没有最高法院。欧盟在定期审查中发现了这一缺陷，并命令英国设立最高法院。这就是为什么如果你去伦敦，去威斯敏斯特广场，在广场西侧，就会看到英国最高法院。为什么？因为英国建立了帝国，却在没有最高法院的情况下退出了帝国。虽然英国一直在谈论权力平衡，但我们需要真正了解所有这些标签的真正含义，以及你是否真的在言行一致。我认为我们都需要找到一种服务于我们自己人民根本利益的方式，而不是被别人说教，将其他价值观强加于我们自己的国家。谢谢。
问
是的，我想向G先生提出这个问题。嗯，你提到过，中国对其他国家奉行不干涉政策，
并且各国应该拥有自主决定其生活方式或其存在方式的能力。但是，嗯，你难道不认为中国在非洲各地的存在在某种程度上，是某种力量的体现，某种软实力的体现吗？这难道不与中国的外交政策相矛盾吗？
答：在谈到中国??与非洲的广泛接触之前，请允许我提一件事。非洲本身就是一个被遗忘的大陆。高宗三（Victor Gao）并非如此。西方国家通常都这么说。非殖民化后的非洲，或多或少是被遗忘的大陆。西方其他国家
出于各种原因
不愿参与。中国参与了。中国把每个非洲国家都当兄弟姐妹一样对待。中国在非洲投资巨大。现在许多其他国家
也在谈论与非洲合作，
包括美国、许多欧洲国家，例如印度。
越多越好，因为非洲
不应该被任何其他国家垄断，
包括中国，也包括其他任何人。非洲是属于非洲人民的，
而布丁的滋味永远是
你不应该自己评判。如果你去非洲国家，问他们
是否喜欢修路，
是否喜欢建体育馆，
等等，那才是唯一的真理，因为
不要被其他国家说教，
非洲国家应该拥有什么样的价值观。非洲的价值观
与其他许多大洲不同。
例如，其他大洲的国家需要帮助非洲国家建设基础设施，提升制造业能力，而这正是中国唯一的目标。中国对非洲国家没有殖民目的。中国与非洲相距甚远。中国在非洲和非洲北部国家（例如拉丁美洲国家）所做的一切，都与非洲和非洲南部国家（例如拉丁美洲国家）的做法相同。这体现了中国的理念，即如果我们建设转型的支柱，我们就会与你们分享。如果我们认为修路是唯一的出路，我们就会帮助你们修路。
非洲学生问
谢谢。我叫詹博上校，乔治城大学大一学生。我的问题很简单。高先生，您这样说是不是有点虚伪？我为什么这么问？您的意思是，在非洲，你们允许一些建筑物和基础设施在那里建造。我来自津巴布韦。我们拥有世界第二大锂矿储量，但仅仅因为中国为我国建立了一个议会，我们就濒临失去所有这些锂矿的所有权。所以，如果你说你在维护各国主权，却要夺走我们自己的议会，比如说肯尼亚的机场，那你难道不虚伪吗？虚伪。虚伪。答：让我直言不讳。津巴布韦是一个伟大的国家。几年前你们举行了选举，当时的总统候选人非常反对中国。他当选总统后，一上任就改变了主意，因为他确信，中国是津巴布韦经济发展的主要贡献者。如果你不同意我的观点，那就回你的国家去和你的政府谈谈，看看过去30年里哪个国家在你们伟大的国家投资最多。我非常了解津巴布韦。中国与津巴布韦历届政府合作了几十年，包括你们的历任伟大总统。我想说，中国与津巴布韦的经济合作，帮助了津巴布韦的经济转型，建设了基础设施，提升了贵国的制造业能力。这是事实。如果我可以告诉你，我认为这是唯一的真相。发展才是硬道理。谢谢你，兄弟。
主持人
我想播放一段现任参议员、美国候任副总统JD Vance的视频。他正在谈论美国的外交政策。
美国万斯说
我们制定的外交政策是对那些不愿与之有任何瓜葛的国家进行恐吓、说教和教训。而中国的外交政策是修建道路桥梁，为穷人提供食物。我认为，我们应该奉行一种外交政策，一种尊重的外交，一种不植根于说教的外交政策。这种外交政策应该植根于我们国家的国家利益。
非洲学生说
是的，我叫伊曼，是西北大学新闻专业的学生。我想回顾一下我们之前关于非洲的对话，我认为我们不断陷入指责中国的陷阱，这很有意思。这并非为中国辩护，但如果我们认真反思，尽管人们像加先生所说的那样，称非洲为被遗忘的大陆，但在整个现代史上，非洲一直被剥削和榨取其所有价值。甚至在殖民主义之前，西方就已经在非洲存在。而就中国而言，这似乎只是权力的转移。这似乎并不像中国走进非洲，决定建设基础设施，以此作为诱饵的一种新兴趋势，因为如果我们看看国际货币基金组织（IMF）的做法，他们基本上也做了同样的事情。托马斯·桑卡拉（Thomas Sankara）多次谈到过这个问题，他试图将非洲国家困在贫困和不稳定的境地，并依赖西方继续剥削。
非洲小黑哥蔑视高志凯：你虚伪！看高教授如何回应！多哈论坛中非激烈辩论。美副总统赞中国帮助非洲！称要学习！哀其不争
2025年9月14日 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaVDqlCr5SM
The Chinese have a foreign policy of
building roads and bridges and feeding
poor people. And I think that we should
pursue a foreign policy, a diplomacy of
respect.
Fore what does China get right in terms of
core principles that the rest of the
world can learn from China?
Thank you very much Fima. It's a great
honor for me to be here and greetings to
the distinguished audience as well as
the other panelists and equally if not
more importantly to the distinguished
students on the stage. First of all, I
think the world we are living in is a
multipolar world. If anyone says they
want to go back to the unipolar world,
it's a mission impossible. For the past
46 years, China has been building
socialism with Chinese characteristics.
I would say the more important thing are
the characteristics. So what are these
characteristics? This is really a
million-doll question. I would say for
the past four decades or so, China has
been put a premium on development.
Shiaoing said development is the hard
truth. We believe every country need to
develop and no country should be
complacent. No country should rest on
its own laurel or even try to throw a
wedge in other count's development. So
stability is very much of an asset and
keeping peace in the world is very much
important and also pushing for free
trade and market practice of all kinds
should be very important. When we look
around the world, China always
emphasizes the importance of
connectivity, infrastructure. Why?
Because we benefited from this. In
China, we have a saying, if you want to
reach, be rich, build a road. That's why
China builds whereas several other
countries
are not in the building mode. They
probably want to destroy. So, I think
the choice is very clear. Let's really
put a focus on development, stability,
peace, and always believe in development
as the hard truth and the softer truth
and the smart truth. Thank you.
So, Victor, you gave us some insight
into the China model. From the way you
described how China sees itself and the
rest of the world, what ideas could we
or do you think China could export
globally?
Well, I don't think China has the truth.
Uh truth is always relative. Uh some
truth works for you, but it may not work
for others. I think from the Chinese
perspective, several things really are
very important. One is that without
democracy there will be no
modernization. So China does not oppose
democracy. China advocates democracy.
But then on the other hand democracy
uh has no set model. You need to adapt
democracy to your own national
circumstances and come up with your own
unique system. Now secondly we hear a
lot about human rights. Human rights are
so important. But I think from the
Chinese perspective, human rights do not
exist in a vacuum. Human rights need to
be balanced with human obligations. You
cannot talk about human rights without
equally talking about
human obligations. Therefore, I think
the Chinese perspective is more
balanced, is more all inclusive rather
than one-sided. For example, in this
August hall, I cannot cry fire. That's
not an exercise of my freedom of speech.
It's actually a violation of law. If my
cry results in stamp tee, for example.
Therefore, I think when we talk about
all these things, we need to be very
careful as to what these labels really
mean. Very quickly, the United Kingdom
for many hundred years didn't have a
Supreme Court. The EU during its
periodic review found that deficiency
and EU ordered the United Kingdom to set
up the Supreme Court. That's why if you
go to London, go to the Westminster
Square on the west side of square, there
is a Supreme Court of the United
Kingdom. Why?
Because United Kingdom build the empire,
declined from the empire without a
Supreme Court. While Britain had always
talked about the balance of power, we
need to really know what all these
labels are really about and whether you
are really delivering and walking the
walk while you talk the talk. I think we
all need to find a way to serve the
fundamental interest of our own people
rather than being lectured upon by
others and having other values being
imposed on our own country. Thank you.
Yeah,
问
I would like to challenge Mr. G
with this question. Um so you've
mentioned that uh China has a no
interference policy with other states
and that states should have their own
ability to dictate their way of life or
their just their existence. But um
wouldn't you say your that chi China's
presence all over Africa is in a way uh
an exercise of some sorts of power a
soft power of sorts and does that not
contradict with um the foreign policy of
China.
答
Allow me to mention one thing before
China's extensive engagement with
Africa. Africa itself is a forgotten
continent. That's not what Victor Gao
said. That's generally being said by
Western countries. Africa after
decolonization was more or less the
forgotten continent. Western countries
did not want to engage it for whatever
reason. China went in. China treated
every African country as brot her and
sister. And China really invested hugely
in Africa. Now many other countries are
talking about engaging with Africa
including the United States, many
European countries, India for example.
The more the better because Africa
should not be a monopoly for any other
country, not for China, not for anyone
else. Africa is for the African people
and the taste of the pudding is always
you should not be a judge yourself. If
you go to African country and ask them
whether they like building a road,
whether they like building a gymnasium
etc. that is the only truth because
don't be lectured by other countries
about what value African country should
have. The African value will be
different from many other continents.
For example, the other countries in
other continents will need to help the
African country to build up their
infrastructure to build their
manufacturing capabilities and that is
the only goal for China. China has no
colonial objective for African
countries. China is so far away
physically from Africa. Whatever China
is doing, China is doing the same in AAN
countries, in Latin American countries
for example. And this is a sign of
China's philosophy that is if we build
our pillars of transformation. We want
to share that with you. If we believe
building road is the only way out, we
help you to build the road.
问
Thank you. My name is Col Jumbo,
freshman student at Georgetown University. My question is
simple. Are you not being hypocritical,
Mr. Gao? Why I'm asking? You're saying
that okay, in Africa, you're allowing
some buildings, some infrastructure to
be there. I'm from Zimbabwe. We have the
second largest lithium reserves, but
we're at the brink of losing ownership
of all these lithium reserves just
because China built a parliament for my
country. So if you're saying that you
are promoting the sovereignity of
nations of of of countries, but you're
taking our own parliament away and let's
say the airport in Kenya for example,
are you not being hypocritical?
Hypocritical. Hypocritical
答
Let me be very blunt. Zimbabwe is a
great country. You had your election
several years ago and the presidential
candidate was very much against China.
He's elected as the president and once
he's in his office he changed his mind
because he knows for sure that for
Zimbabwe development China is the main
contributor for the Zimbabwean economic
development. If you do not agree with
me, go back to your country, talk to
your government and check out over the
past 30 years which country has invested
most heavily in your great country. I
know Zimbabwe well. China has dwelt with
Zimbabwe governments for several
decades, including your great
presidents, for example. And I would say
China's Zimbabwe economic cooperation
has helped the economic transformation
in Zimbabwe in building up
infrastructure facilities and in
building up a manufacturing capabilities
of your country. That is the truth. If I
may tell you, I think that is the only
truth. Development is the hard
truth. Thank you, brother.
主持人
I want to bring in some video from the
current senator and US Vice
President-elect, JD Vance. Here he is
talking about American foreign policy.
美国万斯
We have built a foreign policy of
hectoring and moralizing and lecturing
countries that don't want anything to do
with it. The Chinese have a foreign
policy of building roads and bridges and
feeding poor people. And I think that we
should pursue a foreign policy, a
diplomacy of respect and a foreign
policy that is not rooted in moralizing.
It's rooted in the national interest of
this country.
问
Yeah, my name is Iman. I'm a student at
Northwestern University studying
journalism. I just want to reflect on
the conversation that we had about
Africa specifically, which I think it's
pretty interesting that we keep falling
into the trap of pointing the finger at
China. And this is not in defense of
China, but if we really reflect on it,
as as much as people do call, like Mr.
Ga said, Africa the the forgotten
continent, it has been exploited and milked for
everything it's worth for the entirety
of our modern history. Even before
colonialism, we had Western presence in
in Africa. And it seems like this is
just a shift in power when it comes to
China. It doesn't seem like this is a
emerging trend of you know China kind of
walking in and deciding to build
infrastructure to you know dangle bait
at African countries cuz if we look at
the IMF they did basically the same
thing. We have Thomas Sankara talked
about it a lot of kind of trapping
African states in a state of need and
instability and relying on the west to
continue exploitation.
