2011 (1)
2016 (1035)
2017 (752)
2018 (978)
2019 (385)
2020 (175)
2021 (235)
2022 (101)
2023 (983)
2024 (800)
《墨攻 | A Battle of Wits》主题解析（中文）https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kV9H6Kba56s?
导演： 张之亮（Jacob Cheung）
主演： 刘德华（革离）、安圣基、范冰冰、王志文、崔始源
背景： 战国时期，梁城对抗赵国一支15000人的大军
核心思想源自： 墨子与“墨家学说”（非攻、兼爱、尚贤、守城术）
一、小国如何以“智”胜“暴”：整部电影的主轴
影片呈现一个核心命题：
弱小的梁国如何凭借墨家智慧与伦理，抵挡强国的暴力与征服？
胜利不来自：
-
武力
-
血统
-
贵族权势
而来自：
-
墨家严密的守城技术与军事工程学
-
墨子“非攻”“兼爱”与“尚贤”的伦理与政治哲学
电影不仅是一部战争片，更是一部政治哲学与人性考验的寓言。
二、革离（刘德华）：理想主义者的孤独与宿命
革离是墨家学说的化身：
-
以保护百姓为最高原则
-
反对攻伐、反对杀戮
-
运用逻辑、纪律与协作能力抵抗侵略
-
不贪权、不求名、不求利
他用一人之力改变梁城的命运，将濒临灭绝的国家从绝望中救起。
但影片锋利地揭示：
理想主义者能战胜敌国，却无法战胜人心。
外敌可防，内心深处的贪婪、恐惧与权力欲却无法防。
三、政治悲剧的核心：救国者终被弃于国
梁王（王志文饰）对革离的恐惧与敌意，是全片最深刻的政治批判。
梁王的心理：
-
恐惧革离的人望超过自己
-
恐惧“尚贤”动摇世袭制
-
恐惧权力会流向真正有才能的人，而非王族
因此：
拯救国家的人，反而成为统治者最先要除掉的对象。
这揭示了中国传统政治哲学的一个古老命题：
忠臣多死于乱前，贤者常不容于君侧。
四、范冰冰（逸悦）：人性温度与墨家“无私”的矛盾
逸悦象征普通百姓，同时也代表“情感”的力量。
她的出现凸显：
-
墨家严格的情感克制
-
理想主义的代价：革离压抑自我、压抑人性
-
战争与哲学之间的缝隙：胜利不等于幸福
逸悦与革离的情感线说明：
当大义压倒个人情感时，人性会受到撕裂。
理想主义者往往是在人性层面最孤独的。
五、电影的伦理核心：墨子“非攻”思想的实践与困境
墨家最具革命性的价值是：
-
反对侵略战争
-
以最小伤亡实现最大保护
-
以伦理规范军事行动
革离的行动贯彻：
-
不主动杀戮
-
不滥用暴力
-
战胜敌人后仍宽待俘虏
-
拒绝功名
-
坚持道德高于权力
这使他成为一种罕见的“哲人武士”（philosopher-warrior）。
六、终极命题：道德能否战胜权力？
即使革离赢得了战争，梁国的内部危机却将他推向牺牲。
-
统治者的不安与猜忌
-
民众的善变
-
墨家同道未能如期而至
-
理念无法在现实政治中扎根
影片向观众发问：
正义的哲学可以赢得一场战役，却未必能赢得一个国家的政治结构。
权力是地方性的，道德是普世性的，而普世性常被视为威胁。
七、影片的哲学挽歌：墨家之兴衰与革离之悲剧
结局隐含一个历史事实：
-
战国晚期后，墨家逐渐从历史舞台淡出。
-
墨家强调“兼爱”“非攻”“尚贤”，对统治阶层来说过于危险。
-
革离的命运象征整个墨家体系的历史宿命：
理想主义强大但不受权力欢迎。
影片因此是一曲：
致敬古代中国最理性、最人道却最孤独的一支哲学传统。
主题总结（表格版）
| 核心主题 | 解读 |
|---|---|
| 智慧胜于暴力 | 弱国依靠墨家思想与技术，不靠血统与权势生存。 |
| 政治的讽刺：救国者最不被容 | 权力对贤者的恐惧，是革离悲剧的根源。 |
| 理想主义的孤独 | 理念可以战胜外敌，却难以改变人性与权力结构。 |
| 情感与伦理的冲突 | 逸悦的角色让“无私”显得更悲剧更真实。 |
| 墨家衰落的隐喻 | 影片反映了墨家在历史中的宿命：理念太先进，故难存。 |
Theme Analysis of 《墨攻 | A Battle of Wits》
Director: 张之亮 (Jacob Cheung)
Starring: 刘德华（革离）、安圣基、范冰冰、王志文、崔始源
Setting: Warring States period, ca. 400–300 BCE
Core Reference: 墨子（Mozi）and the Mohist philosophy of defensive strategy, impartial care, anti-aggression.
1. The Central Theme: 小国如何以“智”胜“暴”
The film dramatizes how the weak state Liang (梁城) survives a siege from a 15,000-strong Zhao army, not through power but through:
-
Mohist military science — anti-siege engineering, logical strategy, collective defense.
-
Mozi’s moral doctrine — 非攻 (condemnation of offensive war), 兼爱 (impartial concern), 尚贤 (meritocracy).
The story tests whether philosophy can stand firm when confronted with human fear, ambition, betrayal, and political reality.
2. Ge Li (革离, played by Andy Lau): The Mohist Idealist in a Broken World
Ge Li embodies Mozi’s strict ethical discipline:
-
Protect the innocent
-
Reject aggression
-
Value life above power
-
Use intellect, not slaughter, to achieve victory
His arrival in Liang turns the hopeless city into a disciplined, modernized defense machine.
Yet the more he saves them, the more the film exposes a paradox:
A lone idealist can defend a state from external enemies, but not from internal human nature.
3. The Political Tragedy: “救城者终被城弃”
One of the deepest themes is the political loneliness of the righteous.
King of Liang (王志文) distrusts Ge Li:
-
He fears the people admire Ge Li more than himself.
-
He fears that merit, not bloodline, will determine loyalty.
-
He fears Mozi’s ideology of “尚贤” threatens the monarchy.
Thus:
The hero who saves the state becomes the threat the ruler most wants to eliminate.
This theme echoes classical Chinese political philosophy:
贤者不容于君，忠臣多死于乱前.
4. Fan Bingbing’s Character: Humanity, Affection, and the Limits of Mohist Detachment
Fan Bingbing plays Yi Yue (逸悦), a civilian woman who admires Ge Li.
Her character highlights:
-
Mohist emotional discipline — Ge Li represses attachments to remain impartial.
-
The human cost of idealism — Yi Yue shows that victory without compassion is hollow.
-
A contrast between “philosophy” and “human life.”
Her arc reveals that love and moral duty often collide in wartime ethics.
5. The Moral Core: 非攻 (Against Aggression)
Mozi’s most radical doctrine is “condemning offensive war.”
The film dramatizes this as a continuous moral test:
-
Ge Li refuses to kill unnecessarily.
-
He spares defeated soldiers.
-
He fights to protect, not to conquer.
-
He rejects all offers of political power after the victory.
This positions him as a philosopher-warrior, unlike typical Warring States strategists (Sunzi, Wu Qi).
6. The Larger Question: Can Morality Survive Power?
Even after Liang is saved:
-
Internal politics turn paranoid.
-
The ruler betrays the one who defended him.
-
The people who praised Ge Li soon fear him.
-
Ge Li’s Mohist allies never come — signifying the decline of Mohism in later history.
The film argues:
A just philosophy can win battles, but may not win the hearts of rulers.
Power is local; morality is universal — and therefore threatening.
7. The Final Theme: The Decline of Mohism and the Cost of Idealism
The ending reveals the historical truth:
-
Mohism once rivaled Confucianism in influence.
-
But its strict doctrine (impartial love, antiwar, egalitarianism) made it politically inconvenient.
-
Idealists like Ge Li are admired by the people, but distrusted by kings.
-
This is why Mohism ultimately faded, despite its military genius.
The film thus becomes a philosophical elegy:
A tribute to a lost Chinese school of thought grounded in universal compassion and practical engineering.
Summary: The Film’s Core Themes
| Theme | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Non-aggression & moral defense | Weak states can survive through ethical strategy, not brutality. |
| Righteousness vs. political power | Heroes are often sacrificed after they save the state. |
| Idealism vs. human nature | Fear, jealousy, and ambition inevitably challenge philosophical purity. |
| Love vs. duty | Emotional attachment conflicts with Mohist impartiality. |
| The loneliness of integrity | Ge Li’s tragedy reflects the historical decline of Mohism. |
