川粉逻辑错乱综合症（老白）

川粉逻辑错乱综合症（老白）

川粉因为头脑错乱，基本不能正常生活了。自从八九年前他们的天之骄子懂王出世，他们就兴奋不已，闻粪识香，逻辑开始扭曲，生活和工作都进入颠疯状态，语言逻辑让人啼笑皆非，但又非常自信。我这里举几个例子。

第一，他们个人组织的文学群投资群基本成了谣言集散中心，互相打鸡血，主业荒芜凋零。 文学只歌颂主子，投资只投资领袖概念股，比如就我亲耳听到的，他们认为全球第一大的公司应该是特斯拉，而特斯拉的市值与第一的是三倍之别，他们认为全球唯一搞人工智能的是特斯拉，其它都是骗子，没有人工智能。

第二，他们中的一些对某朝似乎非常痛恨，但对与某朝做生意的马斯克却绝对拥护。在这二者中的一个持什么观点是个人自由思想观念，咱不好说什么，但是两个同时持有就是逻辑错乱了。此外也要对这个矛盾加以化解，我的前相识香港才子川粉某杰在这方面比较突出，昨天他写了一篇文章，他说马一龙老妈出身南非种族隔离白人阶层，修养上等，仪态高雅，但性格简单，因此只要伺候好她，就好拿下川普和马氏。于是让马老太太和邓文迪以及伊万卡三人结成莫逆，三个女人红颜祸水，拉懂王和马氏下水，实为两个英雄所难拒，都怪女人。

第三与第二有所关联，也是与某朝的关系。我有川粉朋友，人本善良，如果生在古代，似乎也能劫富济贫。每天发某朝不公之贴，为弱者鸣不平。但是对于美利坚对穷人的帮助则愤愤不平，对懂王和马斯克取消对弱者的资助大声叫好，极为赞赏。这两个方面，如果是两个人单独的观点，那都很自洽，个人观点无可厚非，问题是一个人同时持有这两种观点，实属厉害，不得不让我高看一眼，觉得他们深得我量子禅之精神，携两种矛盾观点尚能行事，确是高人，如著名作家菲茨杰拉德所鸣。

第四种思维相当跳跃，曾有一师弟本来号称是川黑，绝不川粉，对J6事件不能赞同。但后来某天，忽然成为本校最大川粉之一，而且说恨不能飞回J6，为懂王两肋插刀，纵使入狱也心甘，只等到懂王凯旋归来，特赦成为英雄。话说本人当年因为某事也曾成为川粉几日，但跳跃没有这么巨大，了解懂王绝非本人之辈，对启蒙认知有天壤之别，所以虽然对此师弟的变化稍有理解，但对病情如此严重还是有些吃惊，但病既不在我身，那我就乐观他病入膏肓。

 

Trump Supporter Derangement Syndrome (Lao Bai)

Trump supporters have become so mentally deranged that they can barely function in everyday life. Ever since their “chosen one” emerged eight or nine years ago, they’ve been in a state of constant excitement, perceiving filth as fragrance, twisting logic beyond recognition, and living and working in a frenzied state. Their speech and reasoning are often absurd, yet they exude absolute confidence. Let me provide a few examples.

First, the literary and investment WeChat groups they organize have essentially become rumor mills where they hype each other up while neglecting their main pursuits. Literature exists solely to praise their leader, and investment revolves entirely around stocks associated with their idol. For example, I personally heard some of them claim that Tesla should be the world’s largest company, even though its market value is only a third of the actual largest company. They also believe that Tesla is the only company in the world developing artificial intelligence, dismissing all others as frauds without AI capabilities.

Second, some of them seem to harbor intense hatred for a certain foreign regime, yet they unconditionally support Elon Musk, who does extensive business with that very regime. Holding either of these views individually is a matter of personal belief, but holding both simultaneously is pure logical inconsistency. Some even go to great lengths to resolve this contradiction. A former acquaintance of mine, a Hong Kong intellectual and die-hard Trump supporter, recently wrote an article arguing that Musk’s mother, who comes from South Africa’s apartheid-era white elite, is refined and elegant but simple-minded. He proposed that by currying favor with her, one could easily influence both Trump and Musk. His perceived strategy? Musk’s mother was in a trap to befriend Wendi Deng and Ivanka Trump, forming an unbreakable trio. He reasoned that these three women, as femme fatales, would inevitably drag both Trump and Musk into the web of the regime behind, making them powerless to resist. In his view, it is not the men’s fault—it’s always the women to blame.

Third, and somewhat related to the second point, is still their stance on a certain foreign government. I have Trump-supporting friends who, at heart, are kind people. If they had lived in ancient times, they might have been noble bandits robbing the rich to aid the poor. They frequently share posts criticizing injustices in one particular regime and advocating for the underprivileged. However, when it comes to America, they fiercely oppose government assistance for the poor. They cheer loudly when Trump or Musk cuts aid programs and praise these actions as commendable. If these were the separate views of two different individuals, each perspective would be internally consistent and beyond criticism. The remarkable thing, however, is that the same person holds both contradictory views simultaneously. I can’t help but admire their ability to embody what F. Scott Fitzgerald described as the essence of a first-rate intellect—holding two opposing ideas at the same time while still functioning.

Fourth, their thought process is highly erratic. I once had a junior schoolmate who staunchly opposed Trump, swearing never to be a supporter and even condemning the events of January 6th. Yet one day, out of the blue, he became one of the most fervent Trump supporters at our school, claiming that he wished he could have flown back for January 6th, willing to fight and even go to prison for Trump, just to await his triumphant return and receive a presidential pardon as a hero. I, too, once briefly became a Trump supporter for a few days due to certain circumstances, but my shift wasn’t nearly as drastic. I understand that people’s perceptions evolve, but the sheer magnitude of my schoolmate’s transformation left me stunned. That said, since I’m not the one afflicted, I can only watch with amusement as his condition deteriorates beyond hope.