lesser of two evils: if you want to vote, you gotta decide. So, all personal attack from Trump is distracting as we know what characters they're. Both are "pay for play" - superb in trading/exchanging for money, power, favor, fame - all up on sale, fair play, well known. Don't claim either side got a better human being - you don't. You may shout out loud: That's evil ! but what can you do? Ha? lesser of two evils ! You have no choice. man !
Then what? What's wrong with that? It's well known fact. When old Bush's President, his sons did those "conflict of interest" trading to acquire money and fame and power - even now they're doing it. Donald Trump, publically said he paid for access to politicians. Trump's so creepy that he just attacked himself - pay for play. Cut the crap! Trump got boggled down to details - his policy narratives, specific milestones with time table and measurable matrix.
Being a dirty businessman, Trump can't claim "innocent" "pure" or "clean." Dirt digging, you can't go any where! You can't be cleaner than Clintons. Trump just wastes our time by attacking the same old Clintons stuff, so old that it's stinct to Trump himself - digging feces shows he's so low, so cheap, so deep, so desperate, that he can't come up with something noble, fresh, creative. Sad ! Sadden, bloody sad! I thought he can do better than digging dirt - he disappointed us so bad that we can't side with him, not quite there yet ! He needs to work harder than what he shouts attacks of full force - disguisting!
5) Patch to blacks/latinos in white community audience - absurd.
6) didn't release his tax return - without showing his tax return, no matter what Trump says, useless. (creepy) cover your own before attacking
7) Scare tactics. (dictator style)
He gotta construct and conjure up hope, how, specifically, he can lead to be better! Cut off the bullsxxx attacks - can't go any where, can't move anyone ! Dumping dirt is bad for everyone ! So sick of those same things again, again, and again.
As for voters, we want to ask "what's in it for me?" "Can you deliver what you promise to me?" For those fans for either: Don't add your own interpretation of wishfu thinking - you're dumped as you're too blind, too die-hard, to ignore his or her flaws. Wake up!
For Trump, he got something for me, but he gotta come up with specifics how to deliver those promises for me. Where is his plan? No. He doesn't do that. Heared his rally, I'm so sick of his "sloganeering" "yelling" "attacking" - none of these with any plans to get what I want from him. No vote!
"choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil." God bless America!
lesser of two evils: if you want to vote, you gotta decide. So, all personal attack from Trump is distracting as we know what characters they're. Both are "pay for play" - superb in trading for money, power, favor, fame - all up on sale, fair play, well known. (That's evil, but what can you do? Ha? lesser of two evils ! You have no choice. man !
Then what? Donald Trump, publically said he paid for access to politicians. Trump's so creepy that he just attacked himself - pay for play. What's wrong with that? It's well known fact. When old Bush's President, his sons did those "conflict of interest" trading to acquire money and fame and power - even now they're doing it.
Being a dirty businessman, Trump can't claim "innocent" "pure" or "clean." Dirt digging, you can't go any where! You can't be cleaner than Clintons. Trump jsut wasts our time by attacking the same old Clintons stuff, so old that it's stinct to Trump himself - digging feces shows he's so low, so cheap, so deep, that he can't come up with something noble. Sad ! I thought he can do better than digging dirt.
As for voters, we want to ask "what's in it for me?"
For Trump, he got something for me, but he gotta come up with specifics how to deliver those promises for me. Where is his plan? No. He doesn't do that. Heared his rally, I'm so sick of his "sloganeering" "yelling" "attacking" - none of these with any plans to get what I want from him. No vote!
WASHINGTON - Hillary Clinton is sidestepping new questions about nearly 15,000 recently discovered emails or her family's charitable foundation - a stay-the-course strategy sure to be tested in the sprint to Election Day.
There are a lot of Republicans who are not exactly enthusiastic about their party's nominee. A recent Gallup poll found that only 46 percent of Republicans are happy with Trump; 52 percent wished the party had nominated someone else for the presidency.
首先说说这批经济政策智囊背景。事实上,特朗普的经济政策智囊们,恰恰是他的大金主。Cerberus资本的首席执行官Steven Feinberg就是其中之一:他为特朗普和共和党的联合筹款账户Trump Victory贡献了33万9400美元,他的妻子也贡献了同样数额的捐款。而Beal Bank的董事长Andy Beal则通过捐款44万9400美元为自己谋得一席之地:这一数额是特朗普的筹款账户在法律范围内所能接受的最大单笔捐款。除此之外,Beal在2015年还为特朗普的超级政治行动委员会the Make America Great Again捐赠了10万美元。Beal和特朗普的另一个超级政治行动委员会the Great America也有公开关联,但捐款金额不明。
当然,有的人会说,特朗普公布的第一批经济团队中好歹有一个(唯一一个)经济学教授Peter Navarro。那我们就来聊聊这个Navarro。Navarro是哈佛大学毕业的经济学博士,现在任教于加州大学尔湾分校。作为著名的反全球化斗士,Navarro长期以来认为“中美关系尤其是经贸往来于美国有害”,曾著有《Death by China(死于中国之手)》一书并将其拍成电影,渲染中美贸易对美国的损害。
一个受过正规学术训练的政治学者写文章时可以有情绪,但对于学术著作的评价,应该相对审慎、专业。在《Death by China》的第一章,Peter Navarro一开头就为读者描绘了一个“骇人听闻”的所谓“现状”:中国出口到全球的产品“杀人于无形”,要么致癌、要么易燃、要么有毒、要么致命;儿童首饰都含铅、玩具都易燃;中国出口到美国的药品不是救人而是杀人;如果你“又饿又想死”(原文为“if you're both hungry and suicidal”),你就去吃中国进口的鱼、水果、蔬菜,里面还有各种各样被禁的抗生素、腐败的细菌、重金属或者是不合法的杀虫剂(详见Navarro, Peter. Death by China, PearsonEducation, New Jersey, 2011)。
Peter Navarro说的问题中国有吗?有。污染、不合格产品、假货确实是中国无法回避的问题。但是情况像Navarro描述的这么严重吗?显然不是。作为一个接受过正规教育的经济学学者,Navarro能把一本“non-fiction”的严肃类读物写出科幻的味道,通过毫无严谨性的夸张描写误导读者,简直是“前无古人,后无来者”:纵观全书,缺少像样的实地调查、缺少经济学理论支撑、缺少系统的数据分析和事实分析,只是在堆砌各种有关中国的“骇人听闻”的新闻,择其恶者用以支持、渲染其中国威胁论的观点。
这样一个从逻辑到结论都透着荒谬的所谓“经济学家”,居然是特朗普经济顾问团队中唯一的学院派——可以想见,如果特朗普执政,中美关系将会走向何方。唯一值得庆幸的是,Navarro并非特朗普的嫡系,甚至连靠边站的资格都没有:Navarro本人也承认,二者从未见面,甚至都没有电话交流——“(Navarro) has never met Trump in person. And asfor speaking with him by phone, he acknowledges, “I have never had thepleasure.” 与其说Navarro是特朗普的顾问,不如说特朗普需要一个在经济学领域有一定名声的坚定反华派为自己站台,和自己满嘴跑火车的经济、外交政策产生“共鸣”。